General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo... 8-Member Supreme Court for the Next Four Years?
Because Yertle the Senate Majority Leader claimed that it was bad or wrong or something to confirm a Supreme Court nominee during a Presidential Campaign. We have to wait until after the campaign is over and the "people have spoken" or something like that.
Well, the 2020 Presidential Campaign started today in Melbourne Florida with 9000 people at a campaign rally.
So... did Yertle miss his window?
Are we stuck with an 8-member court until after the 2020 election, now?
Will someone ask him, on camera and on the record?
curiously,
Bright
Alice11111
(5,730 posts)katmondoo
(6,457 posts)A woman comes on extolling his virtues and he appears looking very white and very much in charge. I guess as a woman I am suppose to swoon. NOT
CincyDem
(6,357 posts)He reframed 20 year old comments from Joe B into the Biden rule and clarified that the senate should step aside on supreme court nominations during the campaign.
That feels pretty f'ing clear (unless of course you're a republican).
dchill
(38,489 posts)Or ANY Russo-Republican.
Takket
(21,565 posts)a new member on SCOTUS.
So along those lines, I offer the following reason for Dems to use:
FUCK DRUMPF
uponit7771
(90,336 posts)SDJay
(1,089 posts)a POTUS should not be allowed to nominate to the SC if his/her mental stability is in question.
Or whatever. Just make shit up like they did. I think that's fine if it prevents these fuckers from stealing a SC seat.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,412 posts)Doubt anybody will. His hearings start in March. The pressure on Democrats to cave on confirming him, especially those facing re-election in red states, will be something fierce- which will necessitate Democrats to constantly point back to GOP opposition to even holding hearings for Garland.
TygrBright
(20,759 posts)...and ask him to invoke it!
We got any New Yorkers here willing to remind him?
helpfully,
Bright