Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BeckyDem

(8,361 posts)
Mon Feb 20, 2017, 05:33 PM Feb 2017

Meet Army Gen. H.R. McMaster, the next national top security adviser




By Chuck Williams



Editor’s note: This interview with U.S. Army Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster, former commander of the Maneuver Center of Excellence at Fort Benning, published in July 2014. It is being recirculated as President Donald Trump picked McMaster as his new top security advisor, a position that became vacant last week with the ouster of Michael Flynn, a retired Army general.

Here is the original interview:

Maj. Gen. H.R. McMaster is a combination of warrior, intellectual and leader. He was recently recognized by Time magazine as one of the 100 most influential people in the world.

McMaster earned a reputation for his 1997 book, “Dereliction of Duty,” which questioned political and military leadership during Vietnam.

Read more here: http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/news/local/military/article133566199.html#storylink=cpy
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Meet Army Gen. H.R. McMaster, the next national top security adviser (Original Post) BeckyDem Feb 2017 OP
Inadvertently Aviation Pro Feb 2017 #1
I'm not sure what to think of it yet. He will need to get rid of Bannon from the NSC BeckyDem Feb 2017 #4
Pence picked him njhoneybadger Feb 2017 #11
I am breathing sigh of relief he didnt pick Bolton wishstar Feb 2017 #2
Agreed. salin Feb 2017 #16
It's pretty sad when we're relieved that the WORST bad apple wasn't chosen Fritz Walter Feb 2017 #3
I'm surprised he didn't go with Pufnstuf Warren DeMontague Feb 2017 #5
Trump didn't want the competition for "best hair." Chellee Feb 2017 #8
I think they both use the same makeup people. Warren DeMontague Feb 2017 #9
lol BeckyDem Feb 2017 #13
Could be worse, but Bannon won by making it impossible Hortensis Feb 2017 #6
Are you saying we know McMaster will defintely accept Bannon on the NSC? BeckyDem Feb 2017 #12
45/Bannon insist on choosing the appointee's staff, Hortensis Feb 2017 #14
The fight is in part about the IC, I would agree with that. BeckyDem Feb 2017 #15
He might, but that's not necessarily a huge problem. Adrahil Feb 2017 #19
I hope so, Bannon is a very dangerous character. BeckyDem Feb 2017 #20
Yet another guy who wants a Vietnam do-over C_U_L8R Feb 2017 #7
Yep. It's best not to confuse him with an actual Vietnam vet. dalton99a Feb 2017 #21
Huh. Wonder what illegal deal HE'S trying to get Russian backing for. Squinch Feb 2017 #10
Tapper said good things about him today. I haven't started reading yet..thanks for the link! Lucinda Feb 2017 #17
Seems to be, I will wait and see how he deals with Bannon. BeckyDem Feb 2017 #18
I hope so! Lucinda Feb 2017 #22

BeckyDem

(8,361 posts)
4. I'm not sure what to think of it yet. He will need to get rid of Bannon from the NSC
Mon Feb 20, 2017, 05:48 PM
Feb 2017

before I let my guard down.

wishstar

(5,269 posts)
2. I am breathing sigh of relief he didnt pick Bolton
Mon Feb 20, 2017, 05:39 PM
Feb 2017

Last edited Mon Feb 20, 2017, 08:53 PM - Edit history (1)

That mustache did in Bolton plus Bolton's hatred for Iraq couldn't compensate for his hatred of Russia

salin

(48,955 posts)
16. Agreed.
Mon Feb 20, 2017, 09:24 PM
Feb 2017

Let's thank the mustache. In round 1 'interviews' for cabinet positions, it was reported that a big priority for Trump was that people "look the part", and Bolton lost out because of the mustache. Dude's level of unhingedness matches that of other Trump Team members (Bannon.) Tonight, I appreciate the vanity of Bolton and his affinity for his mustache - even after the reporting that the mustache is why he didn't get an appointment earlier.

Hey John - keep that mustache, it is part of your brand, don't lose it in (at least in the next 3 and 11/12 years.

Fritz Walter

(4,291 posts)
3. It's pretty sad when we're relieved that the WORST bad apple wasn't chosen
Mon Feb 20, 2017, 05:40 PM
Feb 2017

By which, I'm referring to Bolton.
How does one measure the comparative intensity of nightmares?

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
6. Could be worse, but Bannon won by making it impossible
Mon Feb 20, 2017, 05:51 PM
Feb 2017

for Harward and Petraeus to accept--by requiring them accept Bannon staffing their office. This man did, a bad sign, but at least Bannon wasn't able to cut out all almost qualified applicants. And at least Bolton didn't replace Flynn.

NY Times:

"General McMaster is seen as one of the Army’s leading intellectuals, first making a name for himself with a searing critique of the Joint Chiefs of Staff for their performance during the Vietnam War and later criticizing the way President George W. Bush’s administration went to war in Iraq.

As a commander, he was credited with demonstrating how a different counterterrorism strategy could defeat insurgents in Iraq, providing the basis for the change in approach that Gen. David H. Petraeus adopted to shift momentum in a war that the United States was on the verge of losing.

General McMaster’s challenge now will be to take over a rattled and demoralized National Security Council apparatus that bristled at Mr. Flynn’s leadership and remains uncertain about its place in the White House given the foreign policy interests of Stephen K. Bannon, the former Breitbart News chairman who is the president’s chief strategist.


Slate: "
The two other candidates for the job were former U.N. ambassador John Bolton and Lt. Gen Robert Caslen Jr. When he announced his pick, Trump made a point of praising Bolton, who had already been passed over for an administration job. “We had some really good meetings with him. Knows a lot. He had a good number of ideas that I must tell you I agree very much with,” the president said. “So we’ll be talking with John Bolton in a different capacity.”

BeckyDem

(8,361 posts)
12. Are you saying we know McMaster will defintely accept Bannon on the NSC?
Mon Feb 20, 2017, 06:46 PM
Feb 2017

If he can't find a way to control that, we're in trouble. Thank you for the NYT & Slate information.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
14. 45/Bannon insist on choosing the appointee's staff,
Mon Feb 20, 2017, 08:36 PM
Feb 2017

amateurs ideologically and practically tied to Bannon, in there to sabotage their boss's influence on 45. From what people who know them say, this impossible situation is the big reason both Harward and Petraeus turned the position down. The NSA is being filled with politically motivated amateurs, including literally talking heads hired in from Fox.

BeckyDem

(8,361 posts)
15. The fight is in part about the IC, I would agree with that.
Mon Feb 20, 2017, 08:47 PM
Feb 2017

What makes no sense to me is to see this man going along with Bannon being involved, that just blows my mind. I hope to God that is not true. His intellect, background and world view doesn't add up to a Bannon mentality.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
19. He might, but that's not necessarily a huge problem.
Tue Feb 21, 2017, 10:07 AM
Feb 2017

McMaster has a great reputation in the Defense community. One thing he is known for is being able to manage staff. I think McMaster has the character to stand up to Bannon. But we will see.

McMaster is someone who generally wants to keep the military politically neutral. I think he probably took the job to try an blunt what he sees as a push by Trump's advisers to politicize the DoD. I don't know if he can do it. I admire his intestinal fortitude in giving it a shot.

BeckyDem

(8,361 posts)
20. I hope so, Bannon is a very dangerous character.
Tue Feb 21, 2017, 10:13 AM
Feb 2017

His reputation looks to be better than all the other riff raff so far.

dalton99a

(81,486 posts)
21. Yep. It's best not to confuse him with an actual Vietnam vet.
Tue Feb 21, 2017, 10:19 AM
Feb 2017

He's a Vietnam "expert" who apparently never set foot in Vietnam.

Squinch

(50,949 posts)
10. Huh. Wonder what illegal deal HE'S trying to get Russian backing for.
Mon Feb 20, 2017, 06:13 PM
Feb 2017

Seems like every one of them has an illegal Russian deal in the works. It's a pre-req.

BeckyDem

(8,361 posts)
18. Seems to be, I will wait and see how he deals with Bannon.
Tue Feb 21, 2017, 09:34 AM
Feb 2017

Maybe some sanity will come from this man against the craziest among the group.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Meet Army Gen. H.R. McMas...