Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

HAB911

(8,891 posts)
Sat Feb 25, 2017, 03:45 PM Feb 2017

Ever wonder why Faux News watchers are so stupid?

Guest Says Network ‘Solely Responsible’ For Identifying Him As ‘National Security Advisor’


It would appear as if one recent guest on The O’Reilly Factor brought in to speak about the threat of immigration in Sweden is not who he seems to be.

On Thursday’s night broadcast, a segment on Sweden’s status as a refugee-friendly nation featured Anne-Sofie Naslund, the U.S. correspondent for Expressen, and Nils Bildt, who was described by an on-screen chyron (with verbatim accompanying introduction by O’Reilly himself) as, “Swedish Defense and National Security Advisor.” An on-screen graphic leading into the segment read, “One third of all Swedish women no longer feel secure in their neighborhoods.”

But by Friday night some in the Swedish Twittersphere began to speculate that the segment guest Nils Bildt — who told O’Reilly that Swedish politicians have “absolutely… no systemic plan for integrating mass amounts of immigrants to become productive members of society,” — was not who he said he was. Or, at least, who he agreed to be at the alleged design of the network.

Bildt provided the following statement to Mediaite (emphasis mine):

Suffice to say I am an independent political advisor. Fox News is solely responsible for the header or title used. I cannot comment on that. Sorry for any confusion caused, but needless to say I think that is not really the issue, the issue is Swedish refusal to discuss their social problems and issues.

http://www.mediaite.com/online/questions-surround-whether-oreillys-guest-was-really-swedish-defense-and-national-security-advisor/

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ever wonder why Faux News watchers are so stupid? (Original Post) HAB911 Feb 2017 OP
Hmmm and just this week Tucker Carlson used an actor underpants Feb 2017 #1
the very reason I shitcanned 5 friends HAB911 Feb 2017 #2
Which comes first: toddwv Feb 2017 #3
My first thought. What came first, the chicken or the egg? Nwgirl503 Feb 2017 #4
The egg. Lochloosa Feb 2017 #6
They pull the "stunt" and then send a two line apology Bengus81 Feb 2017 #5

underpants

(182,797 posts)
1. Hmmm and just this week Tucker Carlson used an actor
Sat Feb 25, 2017, 03:54 PM
Feb 2017
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.rawstory.com/2017/02/busted-foxs-tucker-carlson-berated-an-actor-who-he-falsely-portrayed-as-an-anti-trump-organizer/amp/


[Editor’s Note: Raw Story previously referred to Shane Saunders as a hired actor. Saunders is an actor based in Los Angeles and is also active in anti-Trump protests. Raw Story regrets the error.]

After Fox News’ Tucker Carlson’s request for an on-air debate with Olga Lexell — a co-organizer of the national Not My President’s Day protests on Monday, Feb. 20 — was turned down, the conservative pundit instead booked an actor and casting agent from Los Angeles, the Daily Beast reports.

Lexell repeatedly turned down Carlson’s invite to appear on the segment, which prompted him to invite someone who Lexell said “was not affiliated in any way with our rallies and was not an organizer.”

Shane Saunders, the actor and casting agent who joined the segment, was referred to as an organizer of the event, both on the screen and by Carlson. “It’s frustrating because, with the exception of one person, all of the organizers are women,” Lexell said to the Daily Beast.

HAB911

(8,891 posts)
2. the very reason I shitcanned 5 friends
Sat Feb 25, 2017, 04:00 PM
Feb 2017

it was obvious they watch Faux 'News' and I have better things to do than attempt to reason with them

Nwgirl503

(406 posts)
4. My first thought. What came first, the chicken or the egg?
Sat Feb 25, 2017, 04:53 PM
Feb 2017

Are they dumb cause they watch Faux news or watch Faux news cause they're dumb? Doesn't matter. Anyone who pops Faux news as a source or something they watch, I already know we ain't gonna get along.

Bengus81

(6,931 posts)
5. They pull the "stunt" and then send a two line apology
Sat Feb 25, 2017, 04:59 PM
Feb 2017

on websites those FOX knuckle draggers never read anyway. So the CON remains. Total BS............

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ever wonder why Faux News...