Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"They don't dig for truth-They skim media for anything that makes them feel better about themselves" (Original Post) kpete Feb 2017 OP
I would add: guillaumeb Feb 2017 #1
Not limited to Trump voters. alarimer Feb 2017 #2
They watch Faux News True_Blue Feb 2017 #3
The article is really interesting - it's about why they do and why they like to believe it bettyellen Feb 2017 #12
The german author Berthold Brecht summed it up best in "Galileo Galilei": DetlefK Feb 2017 #4
Excellent point! kentuck Feb 2017 #5
Confirmation Bias; it's opposite of Scientific Method. Bernardo de La Paz Feb 2017 #6
And unfortunately The Sand Reckoner Feb 2017 #7
DURec leftstreet Feb 2017 #8
k and r niyad Feb 2017 #9
And they are consumed by fear meadowlander Feb 2017 #10
Great article! bettyellen Feb 2017 #11

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
1. I would add:
Tue Feb 28, 2017, 11:26 AM
Feb 2017

Trump supporters only access those media outlets that they know will confirm their world view.

alarimer

(16,245 posts)
2. Not limited to Trump voters.
Tue Feb 28, 2017, 11:27 AM
Feb 2017

This behavior crosses all ideologies. I see it here: people dismiss sources that say things they don't want to hear or are overly critical of "our side", even if the criticism is legitimate.

True_Blue

(3,063 posts)
3. They watch Faux News
Tue Feb 28, 2017, 11:37 AM
Feb 2017

And listen to talk radio all day. That's why they thought Trump was telling it like it is. They think the real news is fake and the fake news is real. They suffer from cognitive dissonance.

DetlefK

(16,423 posts)
4. The german author Berthold Brecht summed it up best in "Galileo Galilei":
Tue Feb 28, 2017, 11:44 AM
Feb 2017

When the cardinals are discussing this new fashion of using numbers in astronomy:
"They (the astronomers) are screaming 'The numbers force us', but where do these numbers come from? From lack of belief!"



Similar about the Trump-supporters: They refuse to believe that such a thing as objective truth even exists. And that's how they explain away knowledge/education as an invention that has the purpose of belittling others.



And let's not forget Jeb Bush's solution to climate-change: Some tinkerer in his garage will eventually figure out a solution. (Translation: Those so-called scientists know nothing.)

kentuck

(111,089 posts)
5. Excellent point!
Tue Feb 28, 2017, 11:48 AM
Feb 2017

I have noticed this about FOX News also.

They are always looking for the exception to prove their point. As if that is the norm and the reality.

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,001 posts)
6. Confirmation Bias; it's opposite of Scientific Method.
Tue Feb 28, 2017, 01:40 PM
Feb 2017

Scientists search and research for negative evidence to knock down their theories. Any theories still standing are highly regarded. A great deal of scientific creativity goes into making tougher and stricter tests for theories.

The more tests a theory can survive, the higher the regard.
The tougher the tests, the higher the regard.

RWAF are particularly prone to searching for a bit of confirming "evidence", without much regard to the source, and then to stop searching there where they find some.

 

The Sand Reckoner

(194 posts)
7. And unfortunately
Tue Feb 28, 2017, 01:42 PM
Feb 2017

the internet makes it easy to find things that will validate pretty much any viewpoint as true and normal, no matter how nutty it actually is.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"They don't dig for truth...