Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
On now Very Interesting in depth dscussion with (Original Post) INdemo Mar 2017 OP
Is it based on the NY Times story? still_one Mar 2017 #1
That and the WP one on Sessions karynnj Mar 2017 #2
wow, this is big. Thanks still_one Mar 2017 #3
Hopefully, "big" is an understatement. dchill Mar 2017 #5
Quite interesting that Sessions was also communicating with the Ruskies. Back when there napi21 Mar 2017 #4

karynnj

(59,504 posts)
2. That and the WP one on Sessions
Wed Mar 1, 2017, 10:28 PM
Mar 2017

They were already scheduled to have a special story on this and these two stories came up.

napi21

(45,806 posts)
4. Quite interesting that Sessions was also communicating with the Ruskies. Back when there
Wed Mar 1, 2017, 10:35 PM
Mar 2017

was a lot of discussion about Beauregard recusing himself from the investigation I was very adamant that he should, but I had no idea he was THIS personally involved! I just wanted him out because I don't trust him with anything. HOW, with the release of this new info, I donp't think there is even a question of "should he" but it's now he must be required to recuse himself!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»On now Very Interesting i...