Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOn now Very Interesting in depth dscussion with
(MSNBC)Brian Williams,Chris Mathew and guests about the Russian hacking and who knew what....
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1124 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
On now Very Interesting in depth dscussion with (Original Post)
INdemo
Mar 2017
OP
still_one
(92,409 posts)1. Is it based on the NY Times story?
karynnj
(59,504 posts)2. That and the WP one on Sessions
They were already scheduled to have a special story on this and these two stories came up.
still_one
(92,409 posts)3. wow, this is big. Thanks
dchill
(38,539 posts)5. Hopefully, "big" is an understatement.
Bigly.
napi21
(45,806 posts)4. Quite interesting that Sessions was also communicating with the Ruskies. Back when there
was a lot of discussion about Beauregard recusing himself from the investigation I was very adamant that he should, but I had no idea he was THIS personally involved! I just wanted him out because I don't trust him with anything. HOW, with the release of this new info, I donp't think there is even a question of "should he" but it's now he must be required to recuse himself!