Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

yodermon

(6,143 posts) Thu Mar 2, 2017, 05:27 PM Mar 2017

That was NON-RECUSAL RECUSAL.

Link to tweet

Those of you saying this recusal is broad?

Please read the thing.

It's related ONLY to the campaign(s), not to already alleged corruption.

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

That was NON-RECUSAL RECUSAL. (Original Post) yodermon Mar 2017 OP

It's a start, I didn't even think we were going to get that much today gopiscrap Mar 2017 #1

But you do not resist LYING JBeau..... asiliveandbreathe Mar 2017 #2

It's the first step... El Viejo Mar 2017 #3

gopiscrap

(23,758 posts)

1. It's a start, I didn't even think we were going to get that much today

Reply to yodermon (Original post)

Thu Mar 2, 2017, 05:29 PM

Mar 2017

asiliveandbreathe

(8,203 posts)

2. But you do not resist LYING JBeau.....

Reply to yodermon (Original post)

Thu Mar 2, 2017, 05:32 PM

Mar 2017

From statement....“This announcement should not be interpreted as confirmation of the existence of any investigation or suggestive of the scope of any such investigation, because we in the Department of Justice resist confirming or denying the very existence of investigations.” .....

El Viejo

(26 posts)

3. It's the first step...

Reply to yodermon (Original post)

Thu Mar 2, 2017, 05:45 PM

Mar 2017

...towards the exit for Sessions.

Reply to this discussion