Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

joet67

(624 posts)
Fri Mar 3, 2017, 10:17 PM Mar 2017

Maddow is talking about figuring out a "Deep Throat". Christopher Steele?

I'm typing as she is talking. Tune in if you are interested. On edit: it was 15 minutes in when I tuned in, in case you catch it on a rerun. She said the fact the Flynn story involved certain information, she explained that means there HAD to already be an ongoing FISA warrant, and also that also meant the fact the info is out means there is a leaker in very high places.

29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Maddow is talking about figuring out a "Deep Throat". Christopher Steele? (Original Post) joet67 Mar 2017 OP
Had to have a warrant because content of the phone calls was leaked and bettyellen Mar 2017 #1
For more in depth view of this process read Eichwald's article. He discussed this in detail KittyWampus Mar 2017 #5
Unless the transcript came from the Brits, the Dutch, another ally or one of the people Putin had rzemanfl Mar 2017 #8
I believe Flynn was in America at the time... there seemed to be an assumption the leaker was ours.. bettyellen Mar 2017 #13
Could be a leaker with access to stuff from the broader intelligence community. rzemanfl Mar 2017 #17
Rachel has been brilliant. Raster Mar 2017 #2
I agree. skylucy Mar 2017 #6
Yeah, she is really the only journalist of her kind right now, as far as connecting the dots and joet67 Mar 2017 #7
Every day the story grows. It seems like there is so much information, it cannot be leaked and skylucy Mar 2017 #3
Yeah, it's like it's building and building. I have my popcorn for now, but I'm hoping joet67 Mar 2017 #10
I just turned her on. bdamomma Mar 2017 #4
yw. nt joet67 Mar 2017 #11
This is scary stuff... tallahasseedem Mar 2017 #9
Yeah me too, but I'm hoping someone subtitles it or something pretty quick for the joet67 Mar 2017 #14
What's that? bettyellen Mar 2017 #15
She showed on that a Russian took with a drone that showed Putin's underling's joet67 Mar 2017 #18
The drone footage was taken of Putin's underlings palatial homes - bettyellen Mar 2017 #19
Ok, thank you. I wish I tuned in a little sooner. I will catch the whole thing again on the joet67 Mar 2017 #20
You're welcome! Yes it's worth watching. bettyellen Mar 2017 #22
I'm watching her. She's outstanding. shraby Mar 2017 #12
She has been for days and days. I hadn't been watching her as much because I am joet67 Mar 2017 #16
What we really need is a John Dean dflprincess Mar 2017 #21
Surely they all know just how deep in it they are... joet67 Mar 2017 #24
Wow OliverQ Mar 2017 #23
Wilbur Ross thing just blew my mind when I found out. It's right out in the open. joet67 Mar 2017 #25
At least one FISA warrant was issued before the election unc70 Mar 2017 #26
My goodness I do hope you are right. The info about the law change in December joet67 Mar 2017 #27
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2017 #28
Not really helpful. zentrum Mar 2017 #29
 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
1. Had to have a warrant because content of the phone calls was leaked and
Fri Mar 3, 2017, 10:22 PM
Mar 2017

There would not be transcripts of a call w an American if there wasn't a warrant already. WOW!

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
5. For more in depth view of this process read Eichwald's article. He discussed this in detail
Fri Mar 3, 2017, 10:25 PM
Mar 2017

the process involves a FISA warrant and about 3 levels of management signing off and okaying the listening in on an American and also the retaining of that information.

rzemanfl

(29,557 posts)
8. Unless the transcript came from the Brits, the Dutch, another ally or one of the people Putin had
Fri Mar 3, 2017, 10:26 PM
Mar 2017

killed.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
13. I believe Flynn was in America at the time... there seemed to be an assumption the leaker was ours..
Fri Mar 3, 2017, 10:28 PM
Mar 2017

rzemanfl

(29,557 posts)
17. Could be a leaker with access to stuff from the broader intelligence community.
Fri Mar 3, 2017, 10:34 PM
Mar 2017

A call to the Kremlin reporting the ambassador's conversation that was intercepted, that sort of thing.

There is so much we don't know or can't trust.

joet67

(624 posts)
7. Yeah, she is really the only journalist of her kind right now, as far as connecting the dots and
Fri Mar 3, 2017, 10:26 PM
Mar 2017

explaining things. I agree with you.

skylucy

(3,739 posts)
3. Every day the story grows. It seems like there is so much information, it cannot be leaked and
Fri Mar 3, 2017, 10:25 PM
Mar 2017

reported all at one time. It is taking a while, but it keeps getting bigger and bigger every day.

joet67

(624 posts)
10. Yeah, it's like it's building and building. I have my popcorn for now, but I'm hoping
Fri Mar 3, 2017, 10:28 PM
Mar 2017

this turns into a slow barbecue.

joet67

(624 posts)
18. She showed on that a Russian took with a drone that showed Putin's underling's
Fri Mar 3, 2017, 10:35 PM
Mar 2017

vast, opulent real estate holdings, and I don't know what else. It was in Russian though. Not sure if that's the vid they meant, but that's what was on when I tuned in. If it's an hour long, I'm sure there was a lot of other stuff. Not sure how it tied into the whole story.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
19. The drone footage was taken of Putin's underlings palatial homes -
Fri Mar 3, 2017, 10:38 PM
Mar 2017

To show how filthy rich they are. (When they don't earn much and have always been civil servants)
I'm not sure if they let them put it on TV but they are for the campaign of the man running against Putin! What courage.

joet67

(624 posts)
16. She has been for days and days. I hadn't been watching her as much because I am
Fri Mar 3, 2017, 10:30 PM
Mar 2017

consuming 24/7 right now and flipping all around to get everyone's take on things. The last few days I have tuned in though, and she's on a real tear.

dflprincess

(28,075 posts)
21. What we really need is a John Dean
Fri Mar 3, 2017, 10:41 PM
Mar 2017

someone who is will go on the record about every last sordid detail.

Of course, Dean didn't do that until he realized he was probably the one who was going to be thrown under the bus. It may take a while before any of Trump's minions figure they're the designated sacrifice.

joet67

(624 posts)
24. Surely they all know just how deep in it they are...
Fri Mar 3, 2017, 10:46 PM
Mar 2017
don't they? My God, the deeper this goes, why wouldn't you start bailing? Arnold did just that today, btw, on that stupid tv show. Someone needs to start singing.
 

OliverQ

(3,363 posts)
23. Wow
Fri Mar 3, 2017, 10:46 PM
Mar 2017

Now she's getting into the Russian fertilizer guy and Wilbur Ross. Russian guy overpaid Trump for a mansion in Palm Beach.

And the Russian fertilizer king kept showing up in several cities at the same time as Trump right before the election.

joet67

(624 posts)
25. Wilbur Ross thing just blew my mind when I found out. It's right out in the open.
Fri Mar 3, 2017, 10:49 PM
Mar 2017

How did they even get away with this?

unc70

(6,113 posts)
26. At least one FISA warrant was issued before the election
Fri Mar 3, 2017, 11:04 PM
Mar 2017

A couple of months ago, it was reported (WaPo or NYT, I think) that FISA warrant had been issued shortly before the election. Two previous requests had been rejected by the FISA Court for being too broad and lacking sufficient evidence.

BTW Alittle-noticed law was changed back in December to make it easier for intelligence agencies to share information regarding US citizens. I have suspected all along that this was done specifically to help with this investigation.

I think that a lot of people are going down in this scandal including senior staff, Trump associates, and some members of Congress.

I am reminded of the WWII allegations regarding Coventry and Enigma. While those allegations are likely myth, great effort was taken to conceal the work at Bletchley.

joet67

(624 posts)
27. My goodness I do hope you are right. The info about the law change in December
Fri Mar 3, 2017, 11:32 PM
Mar 2017

makes sense, but wouldn't that mean some people who might be ensnared had to vote for it? Just thinking out loud.

Response to joet67 (Original post)

zentrum

(9,865 posts)
29. Not really helpful.
Sat Mar 4, 2017, 01:19 AM
Mar 2017

Suppose there is a leaker---but outing that idea on public media doesn't make him/her more likely to continue and it increases the draconian privacy crack-down the WH is already imposing on staff.

Her being "brilliant" is not really worth the attention this will garner. It's not that Bannon hasn't figured out this is the case--it's that now there's public perception that there's a leaker. Bannon will not tolerate that.
I wish she hadn't gone there.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Maddow is talking about f...