General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDid everyone already know this?
I think at some level I suspected this. But with this confirmation I wonder more and more what the most effective response is. Thrashing about with logic doesn't seem quite appropriate.... Thoughts?
This concerns the behavior of internet trolls and their emergence into the center of our politcial life.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/28/magazine/how-the-trolls-stole-washington.html?_r=0
TexasProgresive
(12,157 posts)And no I am not going to click on the link to find out.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,316 posts)Wait, that last one wasnt Yiannopoulos; it was Jean-Paul Sartre, who (as countless Twitter users have noticed) had the anime Nazis number back in 1946. You cant treat the ideas of Milo Yiannopoulos as though they are worthy of debate, because Milo Yiannopoulos doesnt treat them as being worthy of debate. For example, this is why Yiannopoulos was talking about transgender issues on Mahers show to begin with: not because he had ideas about it but because of an incident at the University of WisconsinMilwaukee that Maher described as the time he singled out a transgender student for ridicule. This description, while technically accurate, elides what a colossal asshole Yiannopoulos was being. See for yourself. (Its part of this two-and-a-half-hour speech, if youre feeling especially masochistic.)
http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2017/02/18/watch_hbo_and_slate_give_milo_yiannopoulos_free_publicity.html
TexasProgresive
(12,157 posts)Nitram
(22,801 posts)Kimchijeon
(1,606 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)striking and then standing back to observe the confusion and damage before striking again. And, absolutely, they are skilled in their pushing earnest, truth-oriented targets off balance with absurdities, such as ascribing to them things never said, so that those who don't know how to respond to this tactic (most people) find themselves trying to defend themselves against the ridiculous instead of discussing valid issues. Very amusing. Very common. We've all lived it.
There are clever ways to handle them and win, but for most of us earnest amateurs just refusing to be disconcerted by distracting lies, no matter how insistently re-pushed (and they will be), and following only our original thoughts in a one-sided conversation is best. (If others are around, just walking away and ceding the floor to the other is an option, but in most cases the other "wins."
I once tried the tactic of gazing at a coworker's forehead just above his eyes, never at, while I responded to what was an aggressive attack pretending to be polite interest in my views, and it did help me stay cool and collected. Recognizing malicious and manipulative people for what they are beforehand is most helpful of all, though.
applegrove
(118,654 posts)to make her friends laugh. It is sadism. Only a small percentage of the population are. But they cause a ton of damage and enjoy it.