Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,881 posts)
Mon Mar 6, 2017, 10:29 PM Mar 2017

White House does not know if alleged surveillance of Trump was by wiretap

Source: The Guardian

White House does not know if alleged surveillance of Trump was by wiretap

President had claimed – without evidence – that Obama tapped
his phones and press secretary cites ‘substantial reporting’ to
warrant congressional investigation


David Smith in Washington
Monday 6 March 2017 20.23 GMT

The White House has admitted that Donald Trump does not know what type of surveillance he is alleging he was put under by Barack Obama, despite a tweet on Saturday explicitly saying his phone was tapped.

Sean Spicer, the president’s press secretary, argued that there is “substantial reporting” to show the issue merits congressional investigation, but did not identify Trump’s sources.

Trump alleged, without citing evidence, that Obama ordered a wiretap of the phones at Trump’s election campaign headquarters in Trump Tower in New York. “How low has President Obama gone to tapp (sic) my phones during the very sacred election process,” he tweeted early on Saturday morning. “This is Nixon/Watergate. Bad (or sick) guy!”

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]

But Spicer told reporters on Monday: “It could be Fisa, it could be surveillance. I think he’s (Trump) made clear that there are continued reports that have been out there. I think the president made it clear yesterday that he wants Congress to go in and look at this. I think there is substantial reporting out there from individuals and from sources.”

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/mar/06/white-house-trump-surveillance-wiretap-sean-spicer
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
White House does not know if alleged surveillance of Trump was by wiretap (Original Post) Eugene Mar 2017 OP
It was done by telepathy, not by wiretap. dalton99a Mar 2017 #1
There's an App for that, LOL WheelWalker Mar 2017 #3
imagine working for this crazy man? it must be a nightmare. spanone Mar 2017 #2
Some people apparently don't see the crazy... that's just crazy. WheelWalker Mar 2017 #4
Congress? Don't the heads of every government agency and dept. answer directly to Trump? 50 Shades Of Blue Mar 2017 #5
Cause he doesn't know which ones those are... Volaris Mar 2017 #16
Well if you get your info from Wellstone ruled Mar 2017 #6
This could be why...post earlier.. asiliveandbreathe Mar 2017 #8
So true. Wellstone ruled Mar 2017 #10
Russian Involvement? CitizenZero Mar 2017 #7
Maybe President Trump should have some evidence before he pops off? gratuitous Mar 2017 #9
Mark Levin & Breitbart do not add up to "substantial reporting". . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2017 #11
Fake News, truly tavalon Mar 2017 #14
"It could have been FISA, it could be surveillance..." brer cat Mar 2017 #12
I'm confused, does trump distrust the media or does he live and breathe by it? tavalon Mar 2017 #13
Substantial and continued reporting is now a standard of evidence? Mr. Ected Mar 2017 #15
But of course. phylny Mar 2017 #18
Key word is "alleged" and by whom "trump" Cha Mar 2017 #17

50 Shades Of Blue

(9,985 posts)
5. Congress? Don't the heads of every government agency and dept. answer directly to Trump?
Mon Mar 6, 2017, 10:40 PM
Mar 2017

WTF doesn't he just ask the applicable ones?

Volaris

(10,270 posts)
16. Cause he doesn't know which ones those are...
Tue Mar 7, 2017, 02:04 AM
Mar 2017

Because he's an abject fucking moron.
If somebody told him his headquarters environment had been electronically compromised, his dumbass would call the EPA.

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
6. Well if you get your info from
Mon Mar 6, 2017, 10:43 PM
Mar 2017

Alex Jones,you most likely believe in the Commie Mind Control efforts of Stalin,which were proven to be a complete farce.

CitizenZero

(525 posts)
7. Russian Involvement?
Mon Mar 6, 2017, 10:45 PM
Mar 2017

Is it possible that some element in the Government was surveilling Russians like Sergey Kislyak and that a Russian Agent contacted actors in the Trump Campaign via phone? By which I mean, maybe Russian Agents were being observed and these Russians made contact with the Trump Campaign.

If so, Trump was not under surveillance, but a Russian that contacted him or his People was. So, there might have been a legitimate investigation that had recorded something out of Trump Tower. I realize this is a remote possibility, but it is something I have not seen mentioned. It is my understanding that our Intelligence Services regularly have Russians under observation.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
9. Maybe President Trump should have some evidence before he pops off?
Mon Mar 6, 2017, 10:49 PM
Mar 2017

It would render him mute, which I'm sure everyone agrees would be too bad.

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,001 posts)
11. Mark Levin & Breitbart do not add up to "substantial reporting". . . . nt
Mon Mar 6, 2017, 11:01 PM
Mar 2017

Last edited Mon Mar 6, 2017, 11:35 PM - Edit history (1)

(on edit correcting spelling error in title)

brer cat

(24,562 posts)
12. "It could have been FISA, it could be surveillance..."
Mon Mar 6, 2017, 11:14 PM
Mar 2017

It could have been Michelle in the hall with a glass jar pressed to the wall.

tavalon

(27,985 posts)
13. I'm confused, does trump distrust the media or does he live and breathe by it?
Mon Mar 6, 2017, 11:19 PM
Mar 2017

It's hard to keep up with the coked up man-baby, I swear. He's so Palinesque.

Mr. Ected

(9,670 posts)
15. Substantial and continued reporting is now a standard of evidence?
Mon Mar 6, 2017, 11:23 PM
Mar 2017

Ffs, the media needs to self filter this shit. This imposter doesn't deserve the unconditional pass afforded previous presidents. Press should be mocking him. He can't be taken seriously.

phylny

(8,380 posts)
18. But of course.
Tue Mar 7, 2017, 05:48 AM
Mar 2017

He made a false, idiotic claim, and news organizations are continually reporting on said idiotic claim.

Substantial and continued.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»White House does not know...