General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIn an America where millions of people are underinsured or without health insurance
but the Emergency Rooms still are required to save lives, we go back to the way things were before the ACA:
People who are severely ill or injured will be taken to the ER and their lives will hopefully be saved. But emergency care, drugs, surgery and specialty doctors cost a lot of money. If a patient cannot pay the bills, they risk losing their assets. The cost of the emergency care will be borne by the ER center. Often there is cost shifting so that the more lucrative areas of the hospital end up covering the non-reimbursed areas of the hospital.
Nobody has to run an emergency room. If they lose too much money hospitals can decide not to treat the Level 4 trauma patients any more. The fewer the ERs, the longer the ambulance ride, and the more likely we all are to die.
If the hospital cost shifts to other departments, they will ultimately end up raising prices to cover it. This in turn will make insurance and copays higher for everyone.
I have a gut feeling that the next GOP step is going to be alllowing ERs to decline providing treatment to severely ill or injured patients who do not have insurance or who cannot prove that they are able to self-pay. People will simply die, because society no longer has an obligation to save lives.
Talk Is Cheap
(389 posts)Where's the citation for that claim?
milestogo
(16,829 posts)But I do think that a lot of people will not be able to afford insurance under the GOP plan, or they will have lousy insurance that doesn't provide enough coverage for catastrophic health events. So I think it could easily go that high.
SFnomad
(3,473 posts)Pulling this number out of your bum is just unnecessary histrionics.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Deductible on top of it. Single payer is the only option to keep everyone at an affordable rate.
SFnomad
(3,473 posts)milestogo
(16,829 posts)Or should I dig a hole and crawl into it?
SFnomad
(3,473 posts)"wtf is he talking about".
csziggy
(34,136 posts)I know the one my sister took my Mom to after she fell is and anecdotally I know of three other ERs that are also. When the doctor at the ER handled Mom's case badly - he never got an X-ray for a woman in her 90s with a HUGE bruise on her hip who could not stand or sit without tremendous pain my sister threatened to sue but found out there were no deep pockets to go after.
Separating the two entities limits the liability of the hospital and might limit liability for the ER companies, too. The ER company owns no physical location or equipment - they lease the facility from the hospital and their equipment from various medical suppliers - they hire the doctors, nurses and aides on an "as needed" basis. The hospital makes money on their ER facility but has no legal obligation for anything done there.
I am not even sure if the ER companies have the legal obligation to treat patients the way that hospitals do.
milestogo
(16,829 posts)If there is no requirement for an ER company to treat a patient without insurance, what is the uninsured person supposed to do?
If there is a requirement, I don't see how an ER company could stay in business.
dalton99a
(81,486 posts)csziggy
(34,136 posts)In fact when my sister had the dispute with them, they never billed for the 20% Medicare didn't pay.
milestogo
(16,829 posts)is pretty awful.
csziggy
(34,136 posts)She cracked her tibia but it was not displaced so they didn't have to put her in a cast.
greymattermom
(5,754 posts)100 miles away from any point on a federal highway? Then add a fee to the gas tax to pay for it. At least there would be emergency rooms, especially in some rural areas.
milestogo
(16,829 posts)dawg
(10,624 posts)Trumpcare wouldn't be the same as the conditions that existed before the ACA. It would be much worse.
By ostensibly maintaining the ban on pre-existing conditions without enforcing an individual mandate or providing people with enough of a subsidy to purchase coverage, Trumpcare would set off a death spiral that would eventually price everyone out of the individual health insurance market. I'm already looking for ways to somehow get my family covered under a group plan, but even group plans are likely to be impacted as large employers will no longer be required to subsidize coverage for their employees.
Many rural and local hospitals and ER's will be forced to close.
And only certain ER's are forced to accept indigent patients. Others are free to turn patients away.
Only government employees and employees of the largest and most generous corporations would be safe. And even they will be asked to contribute more and more.