Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA Judge Just Granted A Restraining Order Against Trumps Second Muslim Ban
Almost on cue, President Trumps second anti-Muslim travel ban has hit a major snag. A judge on the Western District Court of Wisconsin has issued a temporary restraining order against the government, allowing an unknown plaintiff to be reunited with his wife and children, who are stranded in the devastated city of Aleppo, Syria.
Link to tweet
Trumps second Muslim ban is similar to the first, restricting travelers from six Muslim-majority nations Syria, Somalia, Libya, Yemen, Iran, and Sudan from entering the United States for 90 days.
Crucially, it now leaves out Iraq due to concerns that it would hamper counterterrorism efforts against Daesh (ISIS/ISIL), which undermines the entire premise of the ban, which is to prevent Daeshi sleeper agents from infiltrating the United States as tourists or refugees.
The ban on Syrian refugees fleeing the brutal six-year civil war has been reduced to 120 days. The current ban also allows those with green cards and legal residents to return to the United States.
Read more:
http://occupydemocrats.com/2017/03/13/judge-just-granted-restraining-order-trumps-second-muslim-ban/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
14 replies, 3387 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (45)
ReplyReply to this post
14 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A Judge Just Granted A Restraining Order Against Trumps Second Muslim Ban (Original Post)
bathroommonkey76
Mar 2017
OP
The Law fights back. "First they came for the Muslims, and we said: 'Not today, motherfckrs'"
Hekate
Mar 2017
#1
It's illegal, immoral, wrong, and completely unconstitutional no matter which way you look at it.
Initech
Mar 2017
#3
Seek shelter immediately!!! Radar reports a severe tweetstorm on the horizon! nt
GliderGuider
Mar 2017
#5
Hekate
(90,674 posts)1. The Law fights back. "First they came for the Muslims, and we said: 'Not today, motherfckrs'"
Airport protestor, Night One of the first ban.
We've gained another day, so to speak.
secondwind
(16,903 posts)11. EXCELLENT!
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)2. Holy Cow and to think
this came from Walkers Libertarian State of Hell.
Initech
(100,068 posts)3. It's illegal, immoral, wrong, and completely unconstitutional no matter which way you look at it.
Dr. Strange
(25,920 posts)4. Damn those so-called judges!
GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)5. Seek shelter immediately!!! Radar reports a severe tweetstorm on the horizon! nt
shenmue
(38,506 posts)12. Haaaaaaaaaaaaa
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)6. Unfortunately, travel ban may doing okay so far. This was
2 days ago and may not hold according to this New York Mag article today summarizing where we are so far.
Trumps Revised Travel Ban Has Survived Its Early Legal Challenges
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/03/revised-travel-ban-has-survived-its-early-legal-challenges.html
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/03/revised-travel-ban-has-survived-its-early-legal-challenges.html
Btw, occupydemocrats may make satisfying reading, but, generally speaking, its content is...let's say frequently misleading on purpose in pursuit of goal, and at best does not do enough to advance understanding.
mobeau69
(11,143 posts)10. True. n/t
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)7. No, you mean a "so-called judge" from Wisconsin
prevented the Trumpenfuhrer's latest ban from going into effect.
(if really necessary)
Dopers_Greed
(2,640 posts)8. I'd love to see Twitler's face...
...when he got the news.
gopiscrap
(23,758 posts)9. Excellent
H2O Man
(73,537 posts)13. Recommended.
spanone
(135,830 posts)14. same shit, different day.....good on the judge