Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

rainbow4321

(9,974 posts) Wed Mar 15, 2017, 12:56 AM Mar 2017

Drumf and his "doing what was best for my family and employees" excuse

Last edited Wed Mar 15, 2017, 02:27 AM - Edit history (1)

Boo fucking hoo....150mil/year and he was trying to do right by his family by paying less taxes? Poor babies..they must have been hardly able to make ends meet on that paltry 150mil/year..how DID they manage?

And if anyone thinks he gives/gave a rat's ass about employees..how exactly did his employees benefit from HIS personal income/paying lower personal taxes?

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Drumf and his "doing what was best for my family and employees" excuse (Original Post) rainbow4321 Mar 2017 OP

I guess he thought him having to pay interest and penalties would be best for his family too. caroldansen Mar 2017 #1

Wonder how many workers he laid off in 2005? rainbow4321 Mar 2017 #2

caroldansen

(725 posts)

1. I guess he thought him having to pay interest and penalties would be best for his family too.

Reply to rainbow4321 (Original post)

Wed Mar 15, 2017, 01:00 AM

Mar 2017

rainbow4321

(9,974 posts)

2. Wonder how many workers he laid off in 2005?

Reply to caroldansen (Reply #1)

Wed Mar 15, 2017, 02:37 AM

Mar 2017

Or how many contractors didn't get paid? They could probably give an earful about him using a defense of "had a responsibility to my family and **employees**..." press release

Reply to this discussion