Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Stinky The Clown

(67,798 posts)
Thu Mar 16, 2017, 11:37 AM Mar 2017

If Comey's visit with Gramps and DiFi had proof positive of something . . . .

. . . . either way, we'd hear about quickly. Instead, we get "no comment" and eyes that reflect constitutional terror.

Pure speculation here, but I think Comey's message was "We *think* this is what went on by whom, with whom, to whom, and why we think it, but as yet we have no airtight case. We're close. But not quite yet."

A week more?

A month more?

A year more?

The wheels of justice turn slowly.

Meanwhile, they ask themselves: how to we as a country deal not with impeachment but with incredibly serious criminal charges against a president and many in his administration and orbit?

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,412 posts)
1. I'd like to know
Thu Mar 16, 2017, 11:39 AM
Mar 2017

when everybody in this country are going to know something. I mean, this is highly sensitive stuff to be sure but sooner or later we DESERVE to know what they are being told. That's how this country is supposed to be run.

fleur-de-lisa

(14,624 posts)
2. I recently read Louise Mensch's take on this on twitter . . .
Thu Mar 16, 2017, 11:43 AM
Mar 2017

and, even though she is a bit wacky, I think she has this right:

Louise Mensch‏Verified account
@LouiseMensch

A great analogy for the situation is pilot landing safely through bad turbulence. Passengers want updates. Pilot not talking, flying plane.

librechik

(30,674 posts)
7. that's sweet. I used to have hope that Fitzmas would come
Thu Mar 16, 2017, 11:49 AM
Mar 2017

and throw CheneyCo in prison. (sigh)

I refuse to have hope for that partisan traitor Comey. Fix it or not, he's not on my side.

Cosmocat

(14,564 posts)
12. YEP and YEP
Thu Mar 16, 2017, 01:44 PM
Mar 2017

when it was all said and done "fitzmas" was a big nothing burger.

And, Bushco got away with lying the country into Iraq with literally not even the first bit of accountability - after Reagen used the "I was an absentee POTUS, so I didn't know" defense to not get held accountable for Iran Conta.

The fate of this country as a functional democracy in the hands of a scumsucking POS like Comey is pretty damn dire ...

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
4. It could be that the sheer number of 'bad guys' gives the FBI pause.
Thu Mar 16, 2017, 11:47 AM
Mar 2017

How do they go about prosecuting a dozen members of the Executive Branch? It's never been attempted before. Is it the FBI's responsibility or Congress'?

It could also be that communications between Russia and the admin are ongoing. (Yes, they're that stupid, imo.) So they would want to see how much more evidence they can accumulate rather than let some unidentified culprits get away.

Maybe we'll hear something at the public hearing on Monday.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]A 90% chance of rain means the same as a 10% chance:
It might rain and it might not.
[/center][/font][hr]

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
10. I'm not up on details from so long ago.
Thu Mar 16, 2017, 01:36 PM
Mar 2017

But did the FBI arrest all those people? Did it take place over a long period of time? I'm not saying you're wrong, I just don't recall, I was only 15 at the time and not really tuned in.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]A 90% chance of rain means the same as a 10% chance:
It might rain and it might not.
[/center][/font][hr]

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
15. The entire event took over a year to unfold. The Wikipedia page on Watergate has good information
Thu Mar 16, 2017, 10:06 PM
Mar 2017

on the events:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watergate_scandal

The important thing to remember though was that the Democrats controlled Congress then.

libtodeath

(2,888 posts)
5. We could be looking at a president who wants to use military force to keep power.
Thu Mar 16, 2017, 11:48 AM
Mar 2017

Or they know what the Russians are threatening if their puppet is displaced.

femmocrat

(28,394 posts)
6. This is not the first time that Congressional leaders have emerged from a meeting...
Thu Mar 16, 2017, 11:48 AM
Mar 2017

looking scared sh*tless.

Can't someone leak something already?

bdamomma

(63,849 posts)
13. Yes weren't Pelosi and Schumer
Thu Mar 16, 2017, 01:45 PM
Mar 2017

in at any of these talks with Comey? And remember the Black Caucus they were really upset.

I keep on thinking of a "surprise visit" to DC by Pootie now that would put everyone in a tail spin. I am not wishing for it, but I can see it happening. Or some secret meeting place like Mar A Lago.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If Comey's visit with Gra...