Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

deminks

(11,017 posts)
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 07:06 AM Mar 2017

TILLERSON: It may be necessary to take pre-emptive military action against North Korea

http://www.businessinsider.com/ap-the-latest-tillerson-cites-pre-emptive-option-for-nkorea-2017-3

Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said Friday it may be necessary to take pre-emptive military action against North Korea if the threat from their weapons program reaches a level "that we believe requires action."

Tillerson outlined a tougher strategy to confront North Korea's nuclear threat after visiting the world's most heavily armed border near the tense buffer zone between rivals North and South Korea.

Asked about the possibility of using military force against the North, Tillerson told a news conference in the South Korean capital, "all of the options are on the table."

He said the U.S. does not want a military conflict, "but obviously if North Korea takes actions that threatens South Korean forces or our own forces, that would be met with (an) appropriate response. If they elevate the threat of their weapons program to a level that we believe requires action that option is on the table."

(end snip)

So, who's going to make that decision on the cr*pper between tweets? Did anybody tell Tillerson that North Korea has no oil? Did they ask that single mom in Chicago if her taxes should go to Sesame Street or pre-emptive war? Is that war in "quotation marks"? Thanks, Cheney, for the pre-emptive war policy.
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
TILLERSON: It may be necessary to take pre-emptive military action against North Korea (Original Post) deminks Mar 2017 OP
Madness! Nt procon Mar 2017 #1
oh good god.... chillfactor Mar 2017 #2
Trump the coward Daxter Mar 2017 #3
Has Tillerson said anything that past Presidents/the U.S. have said before. Haven't we always riversedge Mar 2017 #4
No. MrScorpio Mar 2017 #6
This is the scariest shit I've read in a long time. MrScorpio Mar 2017 #5
tRump and company madokie Mar 2017 #7
This is frightening. gademocrat7 Mar 2017 #8
This is why Chump has to go. Liberal In Texas Mar 2017 #9
He knows we've got 30k troops juuuuust south of North Korea and in range of their weapons, right? NightWatcher Mar 2017 #10
They were probably making faces at him from across the DMZ. Buns_of_Fire Mar 2017 #11
they are antagonizing bdamomma Mar 2017 #12
May day, May Day bdamomma Mar 2017 #13
Stupid. moondust Mar 2017 #14
Exactly. He hasn't been in office 2 months yet and declared diplomacy has failed? FSogol Mar 2017 #17
Exxon wants war! FSogol Mar 2017 #15
Gee. Could have seen this coming from the first hour of drumpf's so-called presidency. democratisphere Mar 2017 #16
Well, Seoul (and maybe Tokyo) can bend over and kiss its KingCharlemagne Mar 2017 #18

riversedge

(70,299 posts)
4. Has Tillerson said anything that past Presidents/the U.S. have said before. Haven't we always
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 07:14 AM
Mar 2017

said that all options are on the table for NK?


Just asking.

madokie

(51,076 posts)
7. tRump and company
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 07:24 AM
Mar 2017

are in need of a fix and quick. I mean their ratings are in the crapper and people are starting to wake up

Liberal In Texas

(13,574 posts)
9. This is why Chump has to go.
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 07:36 AM
Mar 2017

Even though Pense wouldn't be better for everything else, he probably would be a bit more careful about starting Armageddon.

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
10. He knows we've got 30k troops juuuuust south of North Korea and in range of their weapons, right?
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 07:41 AM
Mar 2017

What happens to them when we learn the hard way just what weapons NK has?

Buns_of_Fire

(17,194 posts)
11. They were probably making faces at him from across the DMZ.
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 08:01 AM
Mar 2017

Do not taunt the mighty CEO of State who has probably had his ass kissed daily while at ExxonMobil.

Two countries with nutty Dear Leaders who both have nuclear weapons at their disposal. What could possibly go wrong?

bdamomma

(63,922 posts)
12. they are antagonizing
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 08:05 AM
Mar 2017

a country with nuclear weapons???? What the hell is wrong with these people, are they instigating a conflict, this is madness.

moondust

(20,006 posts)
14. Stupid.
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 08:15 AM
Mar 2017

You don't want to publicly even mention a first strike against NK. Krazy Little Kimmy can use that as an excuse to speed up his militarization including rockets and nukes and maybe even launch a first strike as a "preemptive" defense against the "aggressors."

Seems the mighty T. Rex of the mighty Exxon is just a reckless toddler like his boss when it comes to geopolitical diplomacy.

FSogol

(45,525 posts)
17. Exactly. He hasn't been in office 2 months yet and declared diplomacy has failed?
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 08:16 AM
Mar 2017

No, Tillerson, you're failing.

FSogol

(45,525 posts)
15. Exxon wants war!
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 08:15 AM
Mar 2017
Let's have a war!
Jack up the Dow Jones!
Let's have a war!
It can start in New Jersey!
Let's have a war!
Blame it on the middle-class!
Let's have a war!
We're like rats in a cage!
It already started in the city!
Suburbia will be just as easy!
There's so many of us
There's so many of us


 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
18. Well, Seoul (and maybe Tokyo) can bend over and kiss its
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 08:20 AM
Mar 2017

ass good-bye. Anyone who cooperates with this criminal junta is fair game.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»TILLERSON: It may be nece...