Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 08:39 AM Mar 2017

"He has kept none of those promises, yet no one in Congress has shown much interest in oversight."

Business is booming for the Entrepreneur-in-Chief Trump — and that’s suspicious



http://www.rawstory.com/2017/03/business-is-booming-for-the-entrepreneur-in-chief-trump-and-thats-suspicious/

It was only two months ago that the president promised to terminate "all pending deals" and impose "severe restrictions" on any new ventures. He can't even shut down his charitable foundation, because it's under investigation for being a vehicle for political donations, legal expenses, and gifts to himself.

He has kept none of those promises, yet no one in Congress authorized to uphold ethical standards has shown much interest in oversight.

So we're back to where we were before the election: Trump still hasn't fully divested, endless conflicts persist, and his businesses remain under the control of family members who communicate with him regularly.

This is not how it's supposed to work. The president should not make policy decisions that affect his personal wealth -- even if it's the fringe benefit of having his name on hotels around the world -- because his business interests, which are remarkable for their opacity, are not supposed to supersede those of the country.
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"He has kept none of those promises, yet no one in Congress has shown much interest in oversight." (Original Post) Miles Archer Mar 2017 OP
They should have been more specific and said that "no Republican" wants oversight rurallib Mar 2017 #1
I had to edit my subject line to get it to fit... Miles Archer Mar 2017 #2
It's the article itself that omits the truth, not you. KittyWampus Mar 2017 #7
Congress isn't interested because Trump is a republican. LisaL Mar 2017 #3
Of course. dalton99a Mar 2017 #5
We need an entirely new system of government. smirkymonkey Mar 2017 #4
Funny how they don't mention it's REPUBLICANS in Congress not caring about oversight KittyWampus Mar 2017 #6

rurallib

(62,411 posts)
1. They should have been more specific and said that "no Republican" wants oversight
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 08:59 AM
Mar 2017

and they intend to not do their job

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
2. I had to edit my subject line to get it to fit...
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 09:41 AM
Mar 2017

...but yeah, I think it more accurately represents the situation.

If we had a House and Senate controlled by a Dem majority, he'd already be gone.

LisaL

(44,973 posts)
3. Congress isn't interested because Trump is a republican.
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 09:49 AM
Mar 2017

If president was a democrat, does anyone not think they would have numerous investigations going?

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
6. Funny how they don't mention it's REPUBLICANS in Congress not caring about oversight
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 10:24 AM
Mar 2017

Democrats have been demanding it relentlessly.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"He has kept none of thos...