Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"He has kept none of those promises, yet no one in Congress has shown much interest in oversight."
Business is booming for the Entrepreneur-in-Chief Trump and thats suspicious
http://www.rawstory.com/2017/03/business-is-booming-for-the-entrepreneur-in-chief-trump-and-thats-suspicious/
It was only two months ago that the president promised to terminate "all pending deals" and impose "severe restrictions" on any new ventures. He can't even shut down his charitable foundation, because it's under investigation for being a vehicle for political donations, legal expenses, and gifts to himself.
He has kept none of those promises, yet no one in Congress authorized to uphold ethical standards has shown much interest in oversight.
So we're back to where we were before the election: Trump still hasn't fully divested, endless conflicts persist, and his businesses remain under the control of family members who communicate with him regularly.
This is not how it's supposed to work. The president should not make policy decisions that affect his personal wealth -- even if it's the fringe benefit of having his name on hotels around the world -- because his business interests, which are remarkable for their opacity, are not supposed to supersede those of the country.
http://www.rawstory.com/2017/03/business-is-booming-for-the-entrepreneur-in-chief-trump-and-thats-suspicious/
It was only two months ago that the president promised to terminate "all pending deals" and impose "severe restrictions" on any new ventures. He can't even shut down his charitable foundation, because it's under investigation for being a vehicle for political donations, legal expenses, and gifts to himself.
He has kept none of those promises, yet no one in Congress authorized to uphold ethical standards has shown much interest in oversight.
So we're back to where we were before the election: Trump still hasn't fully divested, endless conflicts persist, and his businesses remain under the control of family members who communicate with him regularly.
This is not how it's supposed to work. The president should not make policy decisions that affect his personal wealth -- even if it's the fringe benefit of having his name on hotels around the world -- because his business interests, which are remarkable for their opacity, are not supposed to supersede those of the country.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1062 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"He has kept none of those promises, yet no one in Congress has shown much interest in oversight." (Original Post)
Miles Archer
Mar 2017
OP
They should have been more specific and said that "no Republican" wants oversight
rurallib
Mar 2017
#1
Funny how they don't mention it's REPUBLICANS in Congress not caring about oversight
KittyWampus
Mar 2017
#6
rurallib
(62,411 posts)1. They should have been more specific and said that "no Republican" wants oversight
and they intend to not do their job
Miles Archer
(18,837 posts)2. I had to edit my subject line to get it to fit...
...but yeah, I think it more accurately represents the situation.
If we had a House and Senate controlled by a Dem majority, he'd already be gone.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)7. It's the article itself that omits the truth, not you.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)3. Congress isn't interested because Trump is a republican.
If president was a democrat, does anyone not think they would have numerous investigations going?
dalton99a
(81,475 posts)5. Of course.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)4. We need an entirely new system of government.
Because clearly, this one isn't working for us.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)6. Funny how they don't mention it's REPUBLICANS in Congress not caring about oversight
Democrats have been demanding it relentlessly.