Job One for Comey tomorrow--not to blow his case by saying the wrong thing

[librechik]

He will speak only from a tightly prepared script, otherwise he will lose access to some witnesses, like Sessions. And other things only he knows, for gawd sake! Can we trust this man who in chess terms, sacrificed our queen? did he do that to win or capitulate?

ugh

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/17/opinion/what-to-ask-about-russian-hacking.html?rref=collection%2Ftimestopic%2FFederal%20Bureau%20of%20Investigation&action=click&contentCollection=timestopics&region=stream&module=stream_unit&version=latest&contentPlacement=1&pgtype=collection

[LisaL]

1. What case?

What case people expect him not to blow?

[librechik]

2. the NYT link I included is a good beginning

[LisaL]

3. That would be the same NYT that claimed there is no evidence of collusion.

[librechik]

4. so what? This is an Op-ed, We don't expect those to fall in line with the editorials

and again, everyone is talking very carefully, and most of what there is to know is not known by us or the NYT. Classified.

[MFM008]

5. For collusion

With a foreign government to disrupt election for one.

[LisaL]

6. Well, keep on waiting.

I am not holding my breath on this ridiculous theory.

[MFM008]

8. why is it ridiculous to believe

That Manafort, Lewendowski and Stone maybe his son in law as well tried to make deals for Russian interference for maggot?
To do whatever they could to help him win? Why is that ridiculous?
Seems pretty probable to me.
Perhaps we should wait for more proof to come out before we FLUSH the possibilities of
treasonous activity from this bunch.

[librechik]

7. Schiff says there is circumstantial evidence of collusion

I believe him

[ProudLib72]

9. I'm very worried about tomorrow

He could either keep the pressure on tRump or kill interest.

[KittyWampus]

10. If Comey says little of substance, Trump needs to be worried.