Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMR. SPEAKER, only ONE THING can improve Obamacare. MEDICARE FOR ALL
Medicare For All
Single Payer National Healthcare
call it what you want
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/24/upshot/health-insurance-medicare-obamacare-american-health-care-act.html
Loss Aversion, Trump and the New Opening for Medicare for All
MARCH 24, 2017
Republicans are in a bind. Theyve been promising to repeal Obamacare for seven years, and now, having won control of the White House and Congress, they must try to deliver. But while their bitter denunciations of the Affordable Care Act may have depressed its approval numbers, they havent made replacing it any easier.
On the contrary, the repeal-and-replace bill designed by House Speaker Paul D. Ryan has drawn withering criticism from the left and the right. Liberals condemn its use of reductions in health coverage for the poor to pay for large tax cuts for the wealthy, while conservatives bemoan its retention of many subsidies adopted under Obamacare.
In the end, the repeal efforts biggest hurdle may be loss aversion, one of the most robust findings in behavioral science. As numerous studies have shown, the pain of losing something you already have is much greater than the pleasure of having gained it in the first place. And the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that Mr. Ryans American Health Care Act (A.H.C.A.) would cause more than 14 million people to lose coverage in the first year alone, with total losses rising to 24 million over the next decade. Many Republicans in Congress appear nervous about the political firestorm already provoked by the mere prospect of such losses.
Loss Aversion, Trump and the New Opening for Medicare for All
MARCH 24, 2017
Republicans are in a bind. Theyve been promising to repeal Obamacare for seven years, and now, having won control of the White House and Congress, they must try to deliver. But while their bitter denunciations of the Affordable Care Act may have depressed its approval numbers, they havent made replacing it any easier.
On the contrary, the repeal-and-replace bill designed by House Speaker Paul D. Ryan has drawn withering criticism from the left and the right. Liberals condemn its use of reductions in health coverage for the poor to pay for large tax cuts for the wealthy, while conservatives bemoan its retention of many subsidies adopted under Obamacare.
In the end, the repeal efforts biggest hurdle may be loss aversion, one of the most robust findings in behavioral science. As numerous studies have shown, the pain of losing something you already have is much greater than the pleasure of having gained it in the first place. And the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that Mr. Ryans American Health Care Act (A.H.C.A.) would cause more than 14 million people to lose coverage in the first year alone, with total losses rising to 24 million over the next decade. Many Republicans in Congress appear nervous about the political firestorm already provoked by the mere prospect of such losses.
http://www.pnhp.org/news/2017/february/single-payer-reform-is-%E2%80%98the-only-way-to-fulfill-the-president%E2%80%99s-pledge%E2%80%99-on-health
February 21, 2017
Single-payer reform is the only way to fulfill the presidents pledge on health care: Annals of Internal Medicine commentary
Researchers estimate administrative savings at $504 billion annually
Proposals floated by Republican leaders wont achieve President Trumps campaign promises of more coverage, better benefits, and lower costs, but a single-payer reform would, according to a commentary published today [Tuesday, Feb. 21] in Annals of Internal Medicine, one of the nations most prestigious and widely cited medical journals.
Republicans promised to repeal the Affordable Care Act on the first day of the Trump presidency. But the health reform effort has stalled because Republicans in Congress have been unable to come up with a better replacement and fear a backlash against plans that would deprive millions of coverage and raise deductibles.
...
Woolhandler and Himmelstein review evidence that, in contrast, single-payer reform could provide comprehensive first-dollar coverage to all Americans within the current budgetary envelope because of vast savings on health care bureaucracy and profits. The authors estimate that a streamlined, publicly financed single-payer program would save $504 billion annually on health care paperwork and profits, including $220 billion on insurance overhead, $150 billion in hospital billing and administration and $75 billion doctors billing and paperwork. They estimate that an additional $113 billion could be saved each year by hard bargaining with drug companies over prices. A table in the paper summarizes these savings.
The savings would cover the cost of expanding insurance to the 26 million who remain uninsured despite the ACA, as well as plugging the gaps in existing coverage abolishing copayments and deductibles, covering such services as dental and long-term care that many policies exclude.
February 21, 2017
Single-payer reform is the only way to fulfill the presidents pledge on health care: Annals of Internal Medicine commentary
Researchers estimate administrative savings at $504 billion annually
Proposals floated by Republican leaders wont achieve President Trumps campaign promises of more coverage, better benefits, and lower costs, but a single-payer reform would, according to a commentary published today [Tuesday, Feb. 21] in Annals of Internal Medicine, one of the nations most prestigious and widely cited medical journals.
Republicans promised to repeal the Affordable Care Act on the first day of the Trump presidency. But the health reform effort has stalled because Republicans in Congress have been unable to come up with a better replacement and fear a backlash against plans that would deprive millions of coverage and raise deductibles.
...
Woolhandler and Himmelstein review evidence that, in contrast, single-payer reform could provide comprehensive first-dollar coverage to all Americans within the current budgetary envelope because of vast savings on health care bureaucracy and profits. The authors estimate that a streamlined, publicly financed single-payer program would save $504 billion annually on health care paperwork and profits, including $220 billion on insurance overhead, $150 billion in hospital billing and administration and $75 billion doctors billing and paperwork. They estimate that an additional $113 billion could be saved each year by hard bargaining with drug companies over prices. A table in the paper summarizes these savings.
The savings would cover the cost of expanding insurance to the 26 million who remain uninsured despite the ACA, as well as plugging the gaps in existing coverage abolishing copayments and deductibles, covering such services as dental and long-term care that many policies exclude.
P.S.
Your boss is a fucking loser
Link to tweet
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1589 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
MR. SPEAKER, only ONE THING can improve Obamacare. MEDICARE FOR ALL (Original Post)
leftstreet
Mar 2017
OP
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)1. Lol at the photo.
He is going to be giving comedians fodder for the rest of his life.
msongs
(67,405 posts)2. dems dont want that sort of thing at this time, unfortunately nt
Qutzupalotl
(14,307 posts)3. Yes they do.
briv1016
(1,570 posts)4. Hell, expanding Medicaid in the remaining 19 states would go a long way.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)5. The only way to get Medicare for all with these ignorant fools is if they destroy Medicare first.