Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMontana TEA Partier Hijacks Revenge Porn Ban, Forcibly Inserts Victim-Shaming Amendment
Keith Regier
TEA Partier Hijacks Revenge Porn Ban, Forcibly Inserts Victim-Shaming Amendment (Since Stoning Was Out)
You could say a lot of words about anti-women TEA Party legislator Keith Regier, but the words leadership or honor are not among them.
Most of them have something to do with the time he compared women to cattle to explain his bill to prevent access to reproductive care because preg-checked cattle are more valuable as everyone knows. (Yes, there was a compelling handout to show us this concept.)
Yesterday Sen. Regier took woman-hating to a new level during the discussion of HB 123, which attempted to outlaw revenge porn with the full Montana Senate:
Keith Regier: An example was given in committee testimony was someone taking a picture of an 80yo woman at a health club and posted it online. The second thing that HB 29 did was on page 2, line 8. It protected someone that took a selfie and sent it to someone. Then that relationship goes bad and the recipient passes it on to others for whatever reason. Protection for the selfie sender was taken out in Senate Judiciary by removing the words or distribute and thats on line 8 of page 2. It was felt that personal responsibility needs to be a part of the issue.
(Dont you just love the use of the passive voice in this context? It is almost as if the speaker refused to take personal responsibility for his own victim-blaming amendment.)
Read more: http://mtcowgirl.com/2017/03/23/tea-party-lawmaker-hijacks-revenge-porn-ban-forcibly-inserts-victim-shaming-amendment-since-stoning-them-was-off-the-table/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 2470 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Montana TEA Partier Hijacks Revenge Porn Ban, Forcibly Inserts Victim-Shaming Amendment (Original Post)
TexasTowelie
Mar 2017
OP
Initech
(100,068 posts)1. WTF is wrong with these people?
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)2. Republicans don't understand consent. Or they don't care.
It's intrinsic to the whole Republican religious right war on consenting adult erotica, for one- they desperately want to lump everything together; consent, non-consent, material involving adults and not.
They have no problem with banning stuff, they just want to make sure they can ban all the nude photos, not just the ones shared without consent.
shenmue
(38,506 posts)3. What a piece of shit