General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIn GOP anti-abortion bill, unmarried women would legally count as minors
http://www.rawstory.com/2017/03/iowa-gop-abortion-bill-will-grant-parents-of-unmarried-women-rights-to-control-adult-daughters-bodies/An anti-abortion bill being offered by Republicans in Iowa would effectively ban all abortions and give parents rights over the bodies of unmarried adult daughters.
...
The bill states injunctive relief to prevent a physician from performing abortions may be obtained by a parent or guardian of the woman if the woman is less than eighteen years of age or unmarried at the time the abortion was performed or attempted to be performed.
-------------
But they are not obsessed with controlling the womenfolk. Noooooooooooooo.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)sick people
Warpy
(111,255 posts)and renders women of any age chattel of their parents if they're not chattel of a male.
This is the abortion law of Iran. I hope they're proud of themselves, the rotten bastards.
greymattermom
(5,754 posts)then call it that.
Warpy
(111,255 posts)Why do patriarchal males think women remain children? If anyone is childish, it's the patriarchal male.
meow2u3
(24,761 posts)mythology
(9,527 posts)The Supreme Court has more or less held that while abortion is legal, states can impose restrictions past the point of viability. So I can understand Republicans introducing bills that push on the time of viability as science increases. But this is just so blatantly unconstitutional I don't see the point of putting the bill forward. Why not just put forth a bill outlawing abortion in general if you're going this far? Both would just be struck down.
still_one
(92,187 posts)QED
(2,747 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)Liberal In Texas
(13,548 posts)Nuttier than fruitcakes, and scary that they're in power.
ck4829
(35,069 posts)Squinch
(50,949 posts)How dare these assholes.
Frustratedlady
(16,254 posts)briv1016
(1,570 posts)Volaris
(10,270 posts)I would bet good money after bad that's what the wording is SUPPOSED to mean, but apparently Republicans failed English, as well as Biology and ConLaw.
I seriously cannot decide which is worse; that they INTENDED to give control of a legal adults body back to her parents, or that they didn't and are just too abjectly fucking dumb to know how to write shit down according to the basic rules of proper grammer. Neither would surprise me at this point. The above posters are correct...The Courts will have a field day with this.
Republicans tacitly approving of the marrying of legal minors is its own horrifying thread, for another day apparently.
MANative
(4,112 posts)To describe my rage and hatred for republicans' treatment of women.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)so I hear....
Not from a Democrat, but one who speaks for them.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Jesus
Shrike47
(6,913 posts)And yes, it's a nasty, mean, woman-controlling proposal.
luvMIdog
(2,533 posts)MissKat
(218 posts)It is beyond belief.
Christo-facists at work.
What's next? Making women caught in affairs wear the letter A in scarlet on their frock? Making women cover their hair? Making women wear long dresses?
These guys must be so excited about "The Handmaid's Tale" coming out. It's their dream come true.
Coventina
(27,115 posts)(I hope).