General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAnti-Sharia Bills: Another Harmful Consequence of Anti-Muslim Sentiment
Americans United
Anti-Sharia Bills: Another Harmful Consequence of Anti-Muslim Sentiment
There are harmful consequences that have come from the anti-Muslim sentiment President Trump stokes. Weve seen an uptick in anti-Muslim hate crimes. And now state legislatures across the country are pushing harmful bills.
https://support.au.org/page.redir?target=http%3a%2f%2fau.org%2fblogs%2fwall-of-separation%2fanti-sharia-bills-another-harmful-consequence-of-anti-muslim-sentiment&srcid=26837&srctid=1&erid=10243953&trid=f903ffb5-e2bc-4ec4-a227-036e7b862ad7
Warpy
(111,270 posts)it would be interesting as hell because right wing Christians would start opposing them as stepping on their own patriarchal and misogynistic toes.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)grossproffit
(5,591 posts)Panich52
(5,829 posts)grossproffit
(5,591 posts)Panich52
(5,829 posts)They target Sharia solely because it's Muslim yet the religious Right and conservative allies are pushing the same misogynistic discrimination and oppression of women.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)One is the requirement to sever the offending limb of a thief. Another is zina, the area of law under Islam regarding sexual morality, where women are mandated to be stoned if they commit adultery. The most widespread interpretation of zina is that gays should be killed as is mandated in the hadiths. Laws like this exist in the Old Testament but are never followed today, with the official Catholic teaching being that Jesus invalidated most Levitical laws. Not sure what technical justification Jews used to ignore these laws, but they've also clearly dropped these rules as well.
There's no sense in defending a barbaric set of laws. Why the left chooses to die on this cross, as they are in Europe, I'll never know. Anyone who desires that these laws be implemented in society should be involuntarily committed.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)Panich52
(5,829 posts)would be unconstitutional. RW Christians push for them based on bigotry and the fact the Establishment Clause isn't in their copiesthey think their own religious-based laws are just fine.
treestar
(82,383 posts)and their state constitutions not to allow any laws that are sharia laws that would be impermissible here.
In fact they only bring sharia law in, as a court determining if a law fit "sharia" would have to learn all about sharia law and interpret it.
JCMach1
(27,559 posts)Panich52
(5,829 posts)Hope that giggle was pointing to sarcasm.
JCMach1
(27,559 posts)there are also plenty of women bankers and business women... even in the Gulf countries.
Cal Carpenter
(4,959 posts)Why would a state need to pass a bill that calls out one religion when it would be unconstitutional from any religion?
Personally, I'm far more concerned with the very real fact of states' legislatures passing laws justified by Christianity that strip civil rights from LGBTQ folks or make women's reproductive health care inaccessible.
Not so concerned with this xenophobic imaginary bullshit about Sharia Law.
Panich52
(5,829 posts)all the mysogonistic anti-reproductive rights laws are religiously based, therefore unconstitutional. Seems even more solid to me than the often debated privacy argument (tho that was strengthened when med files were made sacrosanct).
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I'm not worried at all about Sharia becoming law in this country but the religious right has been working non-stop to roll back our rights for decades. And they've been succeeding when it comes to restricting abortion.
These anti-Sharia bills are discriminatory and I'm glad Americans United is fighting them.