Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Dyedinthewoolliberal

(15,574 posts)
Wed May 10, 2017, 12:21 PM May 2017

Help me out here Du'ers;

for those more knowledgeable than I on such things I ask the question- Who or what is empowered to launch a special investigation? I recall the Clinton's being investigated for Whitewater et al. Why can't there be a special investigation on 45? Is this a function of party power or what?

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Help me out here Du'ers; (Original Post) Dyedinthewoolliberal May 2017 OP
Yes. It's up to the party in power to okay a new bill to appoint a special prosecutor. brush May 2017 #1
Thanks. nt. NCTraveler May 2017 #2
in essence.. defacto7 May 2017 #5
Used to have a special prosecutor law marylandblue May 2017 #3
oh right burnbaby May 2017 #8
Yes, it is a function of whichever party is in power. yardwork May 2017 #4
This is the ugly truth. defacto7 May 2017 #6
Yes, Dyedinthewoolliberal May 2017 #7
wait burnbaby May 2017 #9
You mean the Justice Department declined to investigate? yardwork May 2017 #10

brush

(53,778 posts)
1. Yes. It's up to the party in power to okay a new bill to appoint a special prosecutor.
Wed May 10, 2017, 12:32 PM
May 2017

The previous law expired in the '90s and wasn't renewed.

And not only that, the president would have to sigh it into law.

Not much likely hood of that happening, which is why trump thinks he can get away with firing Comey.

Right now the repugs are just trying to weather the storm of criticism.

It takes real, patriot Republicans to step forward and force the issue.

Right now all we've got are nothing but repugs.

defacto7

(13,485 posts)
5. in essence..
Wed May 10, 2017, 12:40 PM
May 2017

Dems or Reps request a special prosecutor
Congress controlled by GOP votes to approve
Goes to 45 who vetos
Goes back to Congress who must override veto by 2/3rds.
Is that right?

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
3. Used to have a special prosecutor law
Wed May 10, 2017, 12:35 PM
May 2017

That required DOJ to appoint an independent prosecutor whenever investigating the White House. It was put in place after Nixon. Ken Starr abused his power going after Clinton, so when the law sunsetted neither Dems or Repubs were interested in reinstating. Now it is up to DOJ to appoint independent prosecutors at its own discretion. Too bad.

yardwork

(61,608 posts)
4. Yes, it is a function of whichever party is in power.
Wed May 10, 2017, 12:37 PM
May 2017

Republicans currently control both houses of Congress. That means that Republicans chair all the committees, which determine what gets investigated.

Democrats have no power to move anything forward. No power to open investigations, articles of impeachment, or anything.

Please remember this when people tell you that there is no difference between the parties.

 

burnbaby

(685 posts)
9. wait
Wed May 10, 2017, 01:39 PM
May 2017

I know there were instances during Hillary's email thing where republicans wanted an independent prosecutor, but Obama said no.

Are you sure about whose ever in power decides?

Marie

yardwork

(61,608 posts)
10. You mean the Justice Department declined to investigate?
Wed May 10, 2017, 01:51 PM
May 2017

It would be highly unethical of the president to try to block a congressional inquiry. The Justice Department might decline to investigate, but that is supposed to be independent. (It's not, under Trump.)

In any case, Trump is Republican.

I'm not sure I understand your question.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Help me out here Du'ers;