General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo-called allies of Dems should stop giving Rethugs cover for attacking Dems.
The Dems are fully justified in demanding a thorough investigation of Trump/Russia and in objecting to Comey's firing and all other efforts to obstruct the investigation.
This isn't politicizing anything. The Rethugs are the only ones who are politicizing Trump/Russia.
Link to tweet
Nevernose
(13,081 posts)Or do you just hate Bernie Sanders that much?
The primary is over, folks.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Dems being partisan is comtempible. Irresponsible and opportunistic bullshit.
Nevernose
(13,081 posts)He's clearly on our side -- even goes so far as to say that Comey cost Clinton the election. He's clearly being diplomatic.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)And he's right, this is too important for either side to turn it into one.
Did you watch the interview?
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Last edited Thu May 11, 2017, 09:31 PM - Edit history (1)
IT PARTISAN THEMSELVES!!! He should talk about that.
I don't appreciate the echoing of RW talking points. Why would I?
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Suggesting neither side should do so now is hardly a controversial statement.
Bernie was asked how to get Republicans on board with the investigation and he answered by saying we shouldn't turn it into a partisan issue.
So why did this Twitter user deliberately misquote Senator Sanders?
This is much ado about something he didn't even say. I refuse to get outraged because he answered the question reasonably and honestly.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)a partisan attack- on Dems. How the fuck did he miss that part? Oh yeah, not HIS problem.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Here's his quote again:
"WE have got to stand up in a non-partisan way and not politicize it. Democrats cannot politicize this issue"
How DARE he say such an OUTRAGEOUS thing???
alarimer
(16,245 posts)It's the only way it can ever happen, even if the Democrats regain the majority. I also don't see what is o controversial about Sanders' statement. The hatred of him has become so completely over-the-top.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)WHAT ABOUT ICE ??? HOW DARE HE EXCLUDE FROZEN WATER ?
kcr
(15,316 posts)He starts right off with "We have got to stand up.... " Oh, those weak, sitting down Dems. When is the standing up going to start already? "... and not politicize it ...." This assumes that politicizing is happening. You know those Dems. Always sitting around and politicizing everything. If only they were more like Bernie. Always standing and never politicizing!
alarimer
(16,245 posts)Or at least it will be spun that way.
Democrats historically HAVE been spineless. Or do you not remember the George W. Bush administration? We excoriated them here daily for not standing up against the march to war?
I swear, Bernie could declare the sky blue and some folks here would say it wasn't.
QC
(26,371 posts)R B Garr
(16,953 posts)FOR NO EFFING REASON, just to push his talking points. He says the American people don't have faith in Republicans or Democrats or the political process, WTF did he say that for??? UHH, Democrats were the ones targeted by this Russian hack on our elections -- so it's already political. Why on earth would he peg Democrats for anything in this whole matter is just irresponsible at this point.
uGH!!
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Doesn't flat out and say it they're corrupt that's what he thinks- instead hiding behind the "people think" crap is about as passive aggressive as you can get.
QC
(26,371 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)QC
(26,371 posts)That way we can all look and listen and be all righteous indignationized ourselves.
treestar
(82,383 posts)in that Republicans will make it so by not supporting it regardless.
Demsrule86
(68,565 posts)solved is with partisan activities by Democrats. I have no idea why Sen. Sanders said what he did...let me call it unhelpful. Perhaps he will clarify his remarks.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)angry about the whole thing. I have a friend who's always blathering on about integrity and suddenly he's got this "by any means necessary" attitude about the hocking in general. It's fucking theft- same as when Nixon did it. What part of that is okay?
Demsrule86
(68,565 posts)Democratic and are trolling.
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)That's what he was doing when he said Dems should STOP doing something they aren't doing.
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)Only if someone else does.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)When asked how to convince Republicans to get on board with the investigation Bernie said:
"WE have got to stand up in a non-partisan way and not politicize it. Democrats cannot politicize this issue".
That's ALL he said. He didn't accuse Democrats of politicizing the issue.
The quote "stop politicizing it" is not in that interview.
Period.
And he didn't suggest there was no collusion with Russia either, in fact he referred to the fact that our intelligence agencies all agree that Russia interfered and that Comey cost us the election. Bernie also said the American people deserve to know if there was collusion.
That Twitter user misquoted him for some reason, probably trying to generate clicks by manufacturing a controversy.
Nanjeanne
(4,960 posts)when it's about someone they already despise. Similar to those people they hated Hillary so much they couldn't distinguish fact from alt-fact. But you know it's hard for some people to see--even when looking in a mirror.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)This Kelly person put quotations around a phrase Bernie never said, all people have to do is watch the interview to realize it's not true.
This is so ridiculous.
Nanjeanne
(4,960 posts)what's real. Actually watching or reading can help but that's assuming one really wants to know what's real. when it comes to Sanders -- well it's just sad to see some Democrats so eager to have their personal bias verified.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Taking the word of some anonymous person without actually seeing if what they said is an accurate representation is like getting your news from some guy on YouTube.
People keep claiming Bernie said "Democrats need to stop politicizing it" when it's obvious to anyone who watched the video that's not true. The Twitter user made that quote up.
It's actually pretty funny.
R B Garr
(16,953 posts)when they did watch it. So quit saying they didn't watch it when they did.
QC
(26,371 posts)one of their favorite conspiracy-mongers or propagandists said, no matter how ridiculous, in the manner of a trusting little child.
I thought that was a strictly right wing behavior.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Trial_By_Fire
(624 posts)I, too, thought Democrats and DU only work in the world of truth and facts...Hmmmmm
QC
(26,371 posts)As a fairly influential book cautions us against those who "come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves."
What assurance do we have that Kelly Wallace is a Democrat?
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Last edited Fri May 12, 2017, 12:34 AM - Edit history (1)
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)more respect while throwing shade on Dems. We see him "misquoted" so often it's ridiculous already.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)And he said we could do that by not politicizing the issue. Bernie was right, it's too important for either side to do so. The investigation needs bipartisan support.
Why get upset over something he didn't even say? This is silly.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Still not outraged.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)to "play nice" but it's just as stupid as it is when Trump does the same as a substitue for foreign policy.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)And he's right.
He answered a question about how to convince Republicans to support an investigation reasonably and honestly.
Still not registering on my Outrage-o-Meter.
Sorry.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)This whole brouhaha is another manufactured controversy.
I'll save my outrage for our enemies, allowing some anonymous person on Twitter to get me all worked up over something Bernie never said isn't on my to do list.
But it is amusing.
kcr
(15,316 posts)R B Garr
(16,953 posts)that Democrats were victimized by the 1% Russian/Wall Street Trumpie oligarchs. Blaming Democrats for any of this or even saying that they are not trusted is just irresponsible. That is just incredibly naïve to think that Republicans are going roll over just because he blames Democrats, too. Just more fumble, yikes. He should be blaming the oligarch's playbook, which this is instead of saying people also don't trust Democrats.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Especially the ones that run away to avoid the dog catcher and then came back and try to bite you again later.
It's beyond tedious. It's dangerous. Look where it got us last time.
R B Garr
(16,953 posts)*actually* meddling in our elections --to favor Republicans--then he goes silent on his random oligarch bashing. It's too bizarre for words. Back to saying Democrats aren't trusted... What?!
You're right about the new narratives being hard....
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)pnwmom
(108,977 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Someone trying to get her twitter following number up?
ismnotwasm
(41,979 posts)By virtue of his independent status. I think he's mistaken here, the issue is already highly politicized and Republicans, yet again, are on the wrong side of law and history. They will either acknowledge this disaster(s) as being a disaster(s) or they will double down.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Last edited Fri May 12, 2017, 12:11 PM - Edit history (1)
trying to destroy the government itself.
Cha
(297,210 posts)Oh Really? What's he thinking? Always telling the Dems what they should do.. how about minding his own house?
Link to tweet
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10029052146
WSJ: Comey had just found "possible evidence of collusion" between Trump-Russia when he was fired
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10029046913
More TPM/Marshall "The Timeline Gets Tighter"
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=9052347
The Sally Yates Thing.. It goes on and on.. but you get the idea..
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Yeah I know he thinks it's a Jedi mind trick, he's just placing himself in his favorite position- "above it all". It's arrogant as hell.
Cha
(297,210 posts)himself in a very advantages position. Ooooops
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)But since Cummings and Waters are shouting for the rooftops it's "partisan" and we should cool our jets.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Listen to the Goldberg Variations..
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)I've had enough with him. NO more excuses.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Hassin Bin Sober
(26,327 posts)QC
(26,371 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)QC
(26,371 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Does anyone know if this Kelly person is a Trump supporter? They make up crap about our senators all the time.
QC
(26,371 posts)who claim to be on our side.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Kingofalldems
(38,456 posts)He has nothing more to say as far as I am concerned. Back stabber.
Cha
(297,210 posts)"Politicizing"? What kind of vague bunk is that?.. They're investigating the EVIDENCE, BS. Jeebus.get a clue.
We don't need any MORE pot shots from the sidelines from the one that's ALWAYS on tv. "..Dems should do this.. Dems should do that.. " Mind your own house.
Tatiana
(14,167 posts)That implies that Bernie thought Democrats were currently politicizing the issue.
He said Democrats "cannot" politicize the issue.
Huge difference.
kcr
(15,316 posts)Because I'm not seeing it. Looks like the same thing to me.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Try the Berg VIOLIN CONCERTO.
brush
(53,776 posts)Talk about all of the horrendous, traitorous crap the repugs are doing, for God's sake.
We don't need lectures about what we should do, we need words and action against the trump/Russia cabal, not statements that normalize and give them the benefit of the doubt.
R B Garr
(16,953 posts)He should accurately state that Democrats were victimized by the global oligarchs he likes to rail against, but he doesn't mention the oligarchs. He is not helping by saying people don't trust Democrats -- who could disagree with not wanting Democrats attacked for no reason?!
Tatiana
(14,167 posts)-The President lies all the time.
-The Senate functions best with unanimous consent, but if Republicans keeping trying to cover it up, they may have to slow things down.
-Huckabee's daughter is no relation to me.
-Not a fan of Comey because he is a major reason why Hillary Clinton lost the election.
-However, Comey was leading an important investigation and shouldn't have been fired at this point.
-Bipartisan decisions would help restore citizens' faith in government and our democratic process.
-"Why has Trump been so positive about an authoritarian-type President like Vladimir Putin?"
-"Democrats cannot politicize this issue." Which is true. We have to be on the side of justice.
There's nothing about this interview that suggests Bernie was lecturing Democrats or being non-supportive. If anything, he was reaching out to remorseful Trumpers who may be regretting their vote with class and logic.
fishwax
(29,149 posts)Sanders has spoken out pretty forcefully against this move by Trump. What's the benefit in twisting his words like this?
Crunchy Frog
(26,582 posts)I think some people are so committed to hating Bernie Sanders that they manufacture things out of whole cloth to get outraged about.
Well, if being outraged is your thing, and Trump and cronies aren't sufficient for your purposes, do whatever feels good, I guess.
I didn't support him in the primaries BTW, but I do find this continuing outrage campaign kind of incomprehensible.
Cha
(297,210 posts)be perfect.. I wouldn't have a current problem with him.
Demsrule86
(68,565 posts)LexVegas
(6,060 posts)NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)who consistently accuses DEMOCRATS of being "partisan" while ignoring REPUBLICANS who really ARE partisan. "Let's work with Republicans!" is his dog-whistle for "shut up, Democrats."
And yes, I watched the whole damn video. And yes, he did say some good things. But as usual, he couldn't help himself; he's so used to slamming Democrats at every opportunity that he just had to slip in that they can't make this a political issue.
WellDarn
(255 posts)An infintessimally small group of Soviet apologists on the left (the same one who troll the Amnesty International Facebook page every time AI posts a story about Assad's butchery) provided more cover for Trump firing Comey than the millions of folks calling for him to be fired over his handling of the email story.
But my all means, let's pluck out the mote.
Crunchy Frog
(26,582 posts)Last edited Sat May 13, 2017, 01:12 PM - Edit history (1)
rather than getting outraged over some cherry picked, out of context, misquotes.
Sanders: Great to be with you.
WB: What's your reaction to the president's firing of Comey?
Sanders: Uh, I think it is a situation where the president is impeding a significant investigation to determine whether in fact, there was collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government. As you know, Russia has been interfering in elections big time, in Germany, in Ukraine, many countries around the world. Our intelligence agencies all agree that they interfered significantly in the American election. They were in France last week, trying to elect Le Pen, a very right wing individual.
So this is an investigation that has to go forward in a non-partisan way. And in the midst of this, after Comey says we are doing an investigation. After, according to the NYT, he says "I need more money from the DOJ to do the investigation". After we know he was supposed to testify before the Senate Intelligence Committee tomorrow, suddenly, in the midst of all of this, after months and months and months, president Trump says "you're fired, you're not doing a good job". I think that his reason for firing Comey-he was concerned about how he treated Hillary Clinton, I'm kind of, "give me a break". That really does not pass the laugh test. So I think what we need to do now is go forward; and it's very important that this be done in a bipartisan way. We need a special council, independently selected.
WB: But how do you select that person? It's gotta be approved by Congress. There's gotta be legislation, I assume. The president could veto that legislation. You would need a 2/3s override.
Sanders: If that happens, then you really are in the midst of a Constitutional crisis, but I would hope that within the bureaucracy of the career folks, in the department...
WB: So far it doesn't look like any of the Republicans support what you support.
Sanders: Well, that is a sad state of affairs, and I hope that changes. The bottom line here is that the American people have a right to know whether president Trump's campaign colluded with the Russians.
You know, it is amazing, I think alot of people scratch their heads and try to figure out, why has Trump been so positive about an
authoritarian type president like Vladimir Putin? What is going on? So is there collusion? Let's find out if there is.
WB: And you speak about Comey. You're no great fan of Comey, cause...
Sanders: I am no great fan.
WB: We checked in January. Jan 15th of this year, you told ABC news "It would not be a bad thing for the American people, if the FBI Director were to step down".
Sanders: Absolutely. I think the role that he played during the campaign was disgraceful. It was unprecedented, and it was a factor; one factor, in helping Trump get elected. But right now we're in a different place. Right now we are in the midst of an investigation. Right now this guy was supposed to testify tomorrow, before the Senate Intelligence Committee. And clearly that investigation has got to go forward in as non-partisan a way as it can. To fire the FBI Director in the midst of that investigation is totally unacceptable.
WB: So what can you do to get your Republican colleagues on board, and do you have confidence in the Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Senator Burr, to conduct a thorough and complete investigation?
Sanders: I am not a member of the Intelligence Committee. I know Richard, I've known him for years, and I hope that he does the right thing. Look, this is a very, very important moment. The American people do not have a whole lot of faith in the United States government. Don't have a whole lot of faith in the Republican party or the Democratic party or the political process. And I think we have got to stand up now in a non-partisan way. Democrats cannot politicize this issue. It may turn out, you know what? That Trump's campaign was not colluding with the Russians. If that's the case, that's the case. Forget about it. But I understand now that the White House is saying "you had enough discussion about the investigation". That's nonsense. The investigation is barely beginning.
WB: That's what the deputy press secretary, Sarah Huckabee Sanders said today.
Sanders: No relationship.
WB: No relation. I know she's no relation to you. Same last name. But she said "it's gone on for so long, it's over let's move on."
Sanders: I mean that's just an incredible statement. It barely has begun. You have the FBI Director saying he needs more funds in order to pursue the investigation, expedite the investigation.
WB: Do you have any leverage, with Republicans to get an independent council?
Sanders: Yeah, I think you do. I think essentially the United States Senate does not function very well unless there's unanimous consent. Unless there is a certain level of cordiality. And I hope, and at this point I'm giving the benefit of the doubt to my Republican colleagues, that they are prepared to do the right thing.
Let me mention one area, not my idea, this came from Senator Patty Murray, which I think would be a very, very good gesture. I think that as we proceed and go forward with the appointment of a new FBI director, right now, under the law, under the rules of the Senate, it would only require 50 votes-51 votes to get that person in. I would think it would be a really good gesture, given this moment, when there's so much acrimony and so much distrust, that Mitch McConnell, leader of the Senate say, "you know what, we'll go back to 60 votes. We'll do this in a bipartisan way, so that the entire country feels confident that the new director is not simply a political operative for Trump, but somebody who has the best interest of the DOJ and the FBI..."
WB: Cause as you know, they passed that nuclear option eliminating, going down from 60 to 50.
Sanders: I understand that. Democrats did their thing. But I'm saying that at this particular moment, as we look at a new FBI director, I don't think the country wants somebody who is simply gonna be a activist, or proponent for Trump's policy. They're gonna want somebody who has at least bipartisan support.
WB: One of your Democratic colleagues, Ron Wyden, a man you know, he's suggested that maybe the Democrats should use parliamentary maneuvers to slow down confirmation of individuals for, nominees for various positions. Take other steps in order to...
Sanders: I hope it doesn't come to that, but that's what I meant when I answered your question "what can you do?" You know, the Senate needs to function with unanimous consent, otherwise it really gets slowed down. I don't want to see that happen. I don't want to see that happen.
WB: Give us some historic perspective on what's going on right now. Step back a little bit, and give us some comparisons to other moments in American history. I ask you that as someone who's lived through some tumultuous times.
Sanders: Obviously the suggestion is it goes back to Watergate.
WB: Do you see comparisons?
Sanders: I see some comparisons, but what I think, right now, at this moment. When there is so much distrust of the political process. That we have a president who, I hate to say this, lies a whole lot. When we have a president who has attacked media, you, as "fake news". When we have a president who refers to judges who render verdicts against him as "so called judges". When you're seeing that attack on, what in a sense on the fabric of American society, people are nervous, and now you're seeing a president firing an FBI director in the midst of an investigation. So, I would say this is a moment in which Congress has got to take a deep breath, slow it down. Let's do this thing right.
WB: Senator Sanders. Thanks so much for joining us.
Voltaire2
(13,029 posts)that Bernie is an eloquent thoughtful speaker and the de facto leader of the Democratic Party.
But we need to put the primaries behind us and work together to protect what is left of our republic.