Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIts 1046pm est as I write: What happened to Rachel Maddow's big news story
Didnt she way there will be a big news dump later in the evening???
It cant be the facelift story and how they were blackmailed, that was reported hours and hours
ago.
So what was the story???
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
17 replies, 4131 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
17 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Its 1046pm est as I write: What happened to Rachel Maddow's big news story (Original Post)
brettdale
Jun 2017
OP
american_ideals
(613 posts)1. Maybe Matt Tait at Lawfare, forthcoming?
american_ideals
(613 posts)17. Called it :)
chillfactor
(7,585 posts)2. the WS journal story...
about Peter Smith and his implication involving KellyAnne and Bannon in trying to get Clinton emails.
brettdale
(12,389 posts)6. Oh??
That had been on "CNN International" about five hours ago.
Stallion
(6,476 posts)3. WSJ Part II-tieing Bannon and Several Others in Administration to the Peter W. Smith Story
Kingofalldems
(38,498 posts)4. Oops! Sorry to burst your bubble.
The Lawfare story is bigger than the WSJ followup.
Kingofalldems
(38,498 posts)5. Is it your mission to debunk all Trump/Russia stories?
Sure seems that way.
bigtree
(86,012 posts)15. brettdale is a bellwether
susanna
(5,231 posts)8. Matt Tait's article at
Lawfare blog. Appeared 2 minutes after your post.
Fascinating reading.
Kingofalldems
(38,498 posts)9. Here's some more for you:
wishstar
(5,272 posts)10. Here is link to "bombshell"
https://www.lawfareblog.com/time-i-got-recruited-collude-russians
My perception then was that the inclusion of Trump campaign officials on this document was not merely a name-dropping exercise. This document was about establishing a company to conduct opposition research on behalf of the campaign, but operating at a distance so as to avoid campaign reporting. Indeed, the document says as much in black and white.
The combination of Smiths deep knowledge of the inner workings of the campaign, this document naming him in the Trump campaign group, and the multiple references to needing to avoid campaign reporting suggested to me that the group was formed with the blessing of the Trump campaign. In the Journals story this evening, several of the individuals named in the document denied any connection to Smith, and its certainly possible that he was a big name-dropper and never really represented anyone other than himself. If thats the case, Smith talked a very good game.
Im sure readers are wondering: why did I keep quiet at the time? Actually, I didnt. In the fall, prior to the election, I discussed the events of the story first with a friend, and secondly with a journalist. The trouble was that neither I nor the reporter in question knew what to make of the whole operation. It was certainly clear that the events were bizarre, and deeply unsettling. But it wasnt reportable.
After all, Clintons private emails never materialized. We couldnt show that Smith had been in contact with actual Russians. And while I believedas I still dothat he was operating with some degree of coordination with the campaign, that was at least a little murky too. The story just didnt make much sensethat is, until the Journal yesterday published the critical fact that U.S. intelligence has reported that Russian hackers were looking to get emails to Flynn through a cut-out during the Summer of 2016, and this was no idle speculation on my part.
Suddenly, my story seemed importantand ominous.
Matt Tait
Matt Tait is the CEO and founder of Capital Alpha Security, a UK based security consultancy which focuses on research into software vulnerabilities, exploit mitigations and applied cryptography. Prior to founding Capital Alpha Security, Tait worked for Google Project Zero, was a principal security consultant for iSEC Partners, and NGS Secure, and worked as an information security specialist for GCHQ.
@pwnallthethings
My perception then was that the inclusion of Trump campaign officials on this document was not merely a name-dropping exercise. This document was about establishing a company to conduct opposition research on behalf of the campaign, but operating at a distance so as to avoid campaign reporting. Indeed, the document says as much in black and white.
The combination of Smiths deep knowledge of the inner workings of the campaign, this document naming him in the Trump campaign group, and the multiple references to needing to avoid campaign reporting suggested to me that the group was formed with the blessing of the Trump campaign. In the Journals story this evening, several of the individuals named in the document denied any connection to Smith, and its certainly possible that he was a big name-dropper and never really represented anyone other than himself. If thats the case, Smith talked a very good game.
Im sure readers are wondering: why did I keep quiet at the time? Actually, I didnt. In the fall, prior to the election, I discussed the events of the story first with a friend, and secondly with a journalist. The trouble was that neither I nor the reporter in question knew what to make of the whole operation. It was certainly clear that the events were bizarre, and deeply unsettling. But it wasnt reportable.
After all, Clintons private emails never materialized. We couldnt show that Smith had been in contact with actual Russians. And while I believedas I still dothat he was operating with some degree of coordination with the campaign, that was at least a little murky too. The story just didnt make much sensethat is, until the Journal yesterday published the critical fact that U.S. intelligence has reported that Russian hackers were looking to get emails to Flynn through a cut-out during the Summer of 2016, and this was no idle speculation on my part.
Suddenly, my story seemed importantand ominous.
Matt Tait
Matt Tait is the CEO and founder of Capital Alpha Security, a UK based security consultancy which focuses on research into software vulnerabilities, exploit mitigations and applied cryptography. Prior to founding Capital Alpha Security, Tait worked for Google Project Zero, was a principal security consultant for iSEC Partners, and NGS Secure, and worked as an information security specialist for GCHQ.
@pwnallthethings
NBachers
(17,155 posts)14. "Then, a few weeks into my interactions with Smith, he sent me a document"
I'd love to see this document in circulation.
blogslut
(38,021 posts)11. Here you go
Kingofalldems
(38,498 posts)12. More:
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)13. So pathetic
Foamfollower
(1,097 posts)16. I know, right?
It's explosively massive that campaign officials are being named in the Russian-spygate investigation by Mueller.