General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThere are only 5 GOP women Senators. THREE of them just killed repeal-only.
These 3 women are braver than all the GOP men.
http://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/342534-gops-repeal-only-plan-quickly-collapses-in-senate
Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) says she will not support moving forward with a plan to repeal ObamaCare with a delayed replacement, effectively killing the latest legislative gambit from Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.).
Murkowski, who had balked at the last version of the ObamaCare bill, said she is a no on the motion to proceed to a repeal-only plan. She is the third Republican senator to take that position.
"No. I said back in January that if we're going to do a repeal there has to be a replacement. There's enough chaos and uncertainty already," she told reporters Tuesday.
With Murkowski's defection, GOP leaders do not have the votes to move forward to an ObamaCare repeal bill that passed the Senate in 2015, but was vetoed by then-President Obama. Earlier Tuesday, Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.) also said they will not support moving to the repeal-only bill. Republicans can only afford two defections if Vice President Pence breaks a tie.
Stuart G
(38,421 posts)La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)even GOP women have more empathy for health care issues than their male counterparts
YCHDT
(962 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)dbackjon
(6,578 posts)Grins
(7,217 posts)I wonder if all those Senators locked away in some room in the Capitol drafting that horrid document had been all WOMEN instead of all men.
Would the provisions canceling funding for breast and cervical cancer screening by Planned Parenthood still have been included?
Would they have gutted Medicaid that pays for about half of ALL births?
Would they, in any way, limit the access and availability to birth control while allowing coverage for Viagra?
Would they have provisions that said that only women have to pay for premiums for coverage of pregnancies while men are exempt because they have a "Y" chromosome and, "can't get pregnant"?
Would they have allowed premiums for women to increase a $1,000 a month - on top of their premiums and other health care costs - for an additional rider that covers maternity care and pregnancy?
Would they get into the weeds and prohibit federal tax subsidies from paying for individual market insurance plans because they just happen to cover abortion?
Would they write provisions requiring new mothers to return to work 60-days after giving birth or risk losing their Medicaid coverage all together?
I'm thinking - No!
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Johonny
(20,841 posts)madaboutharry
(40,209 posts)Regardless of a youth spent castrating pigs, Sen. Ernst has proven herself to be an ineffective Koch brother's politician lacking all ability to formulate an original thought. When the national spotlight was on her, Ernst squandered the opportunity to strike out and become a national figure. She proved to be a mediocre follower. She continues to fail the people of Iowa.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)NCjack
(10,279 posts)Frustratedlady
(16,254 posts)They can't be bought or shamed into doing as commanded like many of the wives. I'm sure that really irritates them, which brings a big smile to my face every time it happens.
Initech
(100,068 posts)We must resist the Koch traitors and their dangerous agenda!
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)to keep them at home, barefoot, next time their seats are up
oasis
(49,381 posts)DFW
(54,369 posts)None of them switched parties. These were not defections, but one of two things equally difficult to deal with--either a conscience, or a willingness to put the interests of the people of their state before the interests of Big Insurance and/or their Party leadership. As seen with Joni Ernst, not all Republican women "suffer" from either of these afflictions.
DesertRat
(27,995 posts)Ligyron
(7,632 posts)There'd be less war for a start.