Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSlate. "The Law Is Irrelevant to Donald Trump"
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2017/07/a_breakdown_of_the_latest_new_york_times_trump_interview.htmlThis has never been clearer than in his latest New York Times interview.
By William Saletan
On Wednesday, in an interview with the New York Times, President Trump attacked everyone involved in the Russia investigation: Attorney General Jeff Sessions, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, former FBI Director James Comey, and Special Counsel Robert Mueller. Its one of those tirades that tell you more about the man flinging the insults than about the people hes insulting.
Trump makes several claims that invite investigative scrutiny: for example, that he never made money from Russia or did a deal in Russia and that he didnt shoo other people out of the room before talking to Comey in the Oval Office on Feb. 14. But what comes across most is that Trump doesnt seem to consider, understand, or care about anything that was written or said by others before he sat down to be interviewed. To Trump, the truth is just what he says in that moment, and the law is irrelevant. Heres a breakdown:
1. The Sessions recusal. Trump begins by complaining that Sessions should have told him, prior to being appointed, that he would recuse himself. Trump doesnt specify what the recusal entails, but he says that if Sessions had warned him, Trump would have picked somebody else for the job. At one point, Trump refers to a confirmation hearing at which Sessions falsely denied he had met with any Russians. Trump implies that this is why Sessions recused himself.
Its one of those tirades that tell you more about the man flinging the insults than about the people hes insulting.
These statements completely trample Sessions account of the recusal, which presumably can be backed up by the Justice Department lawyers who worked on it with Sessions. In sworn testimony before the Senate on June 13, Sessions denied that he recused himself because of what he said at his hearing. He testified that he recused himself from matters related to the 2016 campaign simply because he was an adviser to Trump in that campaign. Sessions also denied that the recusal bars him from doing most of his jobincluding his decision, on May 9, to give Trump a letter of recommendation to fire Comey, who was investigating whether the Trump campaign had colluded with Russia.
snip...more at the link.
(Have I said how much I absolutely loathe and despise this monstrous asshole?)
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1103 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Slate. "The Law Is Irrelevant to Donald Trump" (Original Post)
NRaleighLiberal
Jul 2017
OP
Tanuki
(14,926 posts)1. I refused to watch the Inauguration, but I'm pretty sure he
took an oath to uphold the Constitution. And perjury is an impeachable offense.....
uponit7771
(90,367 posts)2. He's not a rich brown skinned dumb ass'd sociopath so the M$M gives him the benefit of the doubt