CNN *****Breaking: Mueller asks White House to preserve all notes related to Jr.-Russia meeting*****

[DemocratSinceBirth]

SING ALONG

[dalton99a]

1. Trump has a long history of destroying and hiding evidence

http://www.newsweek.com/2016/11/11/donald-trump-companies-destroyed-emails-documents-515120.html
Donald Trump’s Companies Destroyed Emails in Defiance of Court Orders
By Kurt Eichenwald On 10/31/16 at 7:00 AM

[Dave Starsky]

4. Mueller already has what he needs...

Or he wouldn't be asking this.

Prosecutors don't ask defendants questions to which they don't already know the answers.

This is designed to either get:

1) The Trump people to destroy stuff that makes them look guilty,
stuff which Mueller already has.

2) The Trump people to hold on to and produce even more stuff that makes them look worse.

[Leghorn21]

5. 10-4, copy dat, and OH HELL YEAH, Dave! Mr. Mueller's just pokin and proddin a little, see

what scurries around in circles, ramming into walls...mmmmm fun!

Thanks for posting!

[workinclasszero]

6. Nice!

[yellowcanine]

7. Mueller reminds me of Lieutenant Columbo.

"Just one more question......"

[tparrett62]

8. Love it!

Hadn't thought of that, but hell yeah! I sure hope Trump has misundersestimated Mueller like all those suave baddies used to do with Columbo!

[Ms. Toad]

9. You're misunderstanding a document preservation letter.

When you get to the point of expecting litigation, you send a document preservation letter. That is a very routine practice. It is intended to preserve evidence - or impose consequences if the evidence isn't preserved.

If an entity has a document retention policy that calls for documents to be retained for 1 month and then destroyed, for example, the entity can legally continue to routinely destroy all documents over one month old without consequences, even if it knows it is under investigation, until you get a document preservation letter. If it destroys anything identified in the document after it receives the letter, you are presumed to have been doing so for the purpose of destroying evidence. If it has intentionally destroyed evidence, the missing evidence is presumed to have contained material adverse to the entity's interests.

[Zoonart]

2. Maybe it will be this instead...

Down goes Mueller and... I Shot the Sherrif!

[Shell_Seas]

3. Good luck with that.

DT and company is as crooked as they come. They will not do that. I bet they already destroyed said evidence long ago.

[Gothmog]

10. This will be fun to watch

[ButSeeYa]

11. Does anyone have advice on how to pardon oneself,

family, acquaintances and aides? Asking for a friend.

[mn9driver]

12. Any documents pertaining to that meeting have almost certainly been destroyed already.

I'm sure they fired up the burn barrel as soon as Junior's emails became public.

[jmg257]

13. Boy bet the WH has tons of paperwork on that meeting!

Or none at all. It was June of LAST year.