Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Wielding Truth

(11,415 posts)
Wed Jul 26, 2017, 12:08 PM Jul 2017

The Countering Disinformation and Propaganda Act is now law. Pres. Obama may have saved us.

Checking on Canadian anti propaganda laws I found this. It may save our democracy and stop the liars in their tracks.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-12-24/obama-signs-countering-disinformation-and-propaganda-act-law

Obama Quietly Signs The "Countering Disinformation And Propaganda Act" Into Law

Late on Friday, with the US population embracing the upcoming holidays and oblivious of most news emerging from the administration, Obama quietly signed into law the 2017 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) which authorizes $611 billion for the military in 2017.

In a statement, Obama said that:

Today, I have signed into law S. 2943, the “National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017.” This Act authorizes fiscal year 2017 appropriations principally for the Department of Defense and for Department of Energy national security programs, provides vital benefits for military personnel and their families, and includes authorities to facilitate ongoing operations around the globe. It continues many critical authorizations necessary to ensure that we are able to sustain our momentum in countering the threat posed by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant and to reassure our European allies, as well as many new authorizations that, among other things, provide the Departments of Defense and Energy more flexibility in countering cyber-attacks and our adversaries’ use of unmanned aerial vehicles."

Much of the balance of Obama's statement blamed the GOP for Guantanamo's continued operation and warned that "unless the Congress changes course, it will be judged harshly by history," Obama said. Obama also said Congress failed to use the bill to reduce wasteful overhead (like perhaps massive F-35 cost overruns?) or modernize military health care, which he said would exacerbate budget pressures facing the military in the years ahead.

But while the passage of the NDAA - and the funding of the US military - was hardly a surprise, the biggest news is what was buried deep inside the provisions of the Defense Authortization Act.

Recall that as we reported in early June, "a bill to implement the U.S.’ very own de facto Ministry of Truth had been quietly introduced in Congress. As with any legislation attempting to dodge the public spotlight the Countering Foreign Propaganda and Disinformation Act of 2016 marks a further curtailment of press freedom and another avenue to stultify avenues of accurate information. Introduced by Congressmen Adam Kinzinger and Ted Lieu, H.R. 5181 seeks a “whole-government approach without the bureaucratic restrictions” to counter “foreign disinformation and manipulation,” which they believe threaten the world’s “security and stability.”
Also called the Countering Information Warfare Act of 2016 (S. 2692), when introduced in March by Sen. Rob Portman, the legislation represents a dramatic return to Cold War-era government propaganda battles. “These countries spend vast sums of money on advanced broadcast and digital media capabilities, targeted campaigns, fund
ing of foreign political movements, and other efforts to influence key audiences and populations,” Portman explained, adding that while the U.S. spends a relatively small amount on its Voice of America, the Kremlin provides enormous funding for its news organization, RT.ong before the "fake news" meme became a daily topic of extensive conversation on such discredited mainstream portals as CNN and WaPo, H.R. 5181 would task the Secretary of State with coordinating the Secretary of Defense, the Director of National Intelligence, and the Broadcasting Board of Governors to “establish a Center for Information Analysis and Response,” which will pinpoint sources of disinformation, analyze data, and — in true dystopic manner — ‘develop and disseminate’ “fact-based narratives” to counter effrontery propaganda.

In short, long before "fake news" became a major media topic, the US government was already planning its legally-backed crackdown on anything it would eventually label "fake news."


* * *

Fast forward to December 8, when the "Countering Disinformation and Propaganda Act" passed in the Senate, quietly inserted inside the 2017 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) Conference Report.

And now, following Friday's Obama signing of the NDAA on Friday evening, the Countering Disinformation and Propaganda Act is now law.

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Countering Disinformation and Propaganda Act is now law. Pres. Obama may have saved us. (Original Post) The Wielding Truth Jul 2017 OP
Huh? Igel Jul 2017 #1
Darn. I thought it was a way to battle our muddled world of politics. Thanks for clearing this up. The Wielding Truth Jul 2017 #2

Igel

(35,362 posts)
1. Huh?
Wed Jul 26, 2017, 06:33 PM
Jul 2017

1. Text of bill, to get past the interpretation put on it by somebody. Apply your own, but only after reading the whole thing. It's short.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/5181/text

2. It's directed outward. It's basically saying there's a committee set up to set up an organization to fight disinformation abroad. You can get part of the way through it thinking it might include the US-internal press, but that exercise ultimately fails as what all those internally-oriented mechanisms do is target "populations and governments", by which I doubt any court will understand "Weehauken" or "Hopatcong" (both towns in New Jersey, not the Netherlands or Thailand). It's why I said you needed to read the whole thing before formulating an interpretation.

3. While the steering committee should be set up, it's unclear what the penalty or enforcement mechanism is or who would have standing to go to the courts to compel enforcement. Like compulsion would do much in this case.

4. Let's assume that the relevant people do set up the committee. The official government line that we'd be putting out would be set by Trump's folks. To fight those narratives that the committee--again, Trump's people--would see a need to fight.

If that's salvation, then thank you, Lord, but I plan to be busy.

The Wielding Truth

(11,415 posts)
2. Darn. I thought it was a way to battle our muddled world of politics. Thanks for clearing this up.
Thu Jul 27, 2017, 03:28 PM
Jul 2017

You never know where some hope my lie. Thanks again.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Countering Disinforma...