"Do you want the President to succeed or do you want transgender soldiers to succeed?"
We have reached a fork in the road, and we have a choice to make. We have one man (Who was selected by 63 million people vs 65 million people... and who also had help from the Kremlin) on one side of this fork and we have potentially thousands of transgender soldiers on the other, who want to defend this country, who want inclusion, who want an occupation, and the costs of their care are less than the costs of Viagra for soldiers or for Mar-a-Lago trips.
We all (as in all Americans) have a choice to make; do we side with the one or with the many, do we side with exclusion or with inclusion, do we agree with the notion that Mar-a-Lago trips being more expensive than the care of transgender soldiers is no big deal or do we agree with the notions of cost-effectiveness?
Choose.
= new reply since forum marked as read
