General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsToxic waste from U.S. pot farms alarms experts
The downside of the pot industry...
Toxic waste from U.S. pot farms alarms experts
WEAVERVILLE, Calif. (Reuters) - Pollution from illegal marijuana farms deep in California's national forests is far worse than previously thought, and has turned thousands of acres into waste dumps so toxic that simply touching plants has landed law enforcement officers in the hospital.
The volume of banned or restricted pesticides and illegally applied fertilizers in the woods dwarfs estimates by the U.S. Forest Service in 2014, when a top enforcement official testified that the pollution was threatening forest land in California and other states.
California accounts for more than 90 percent of illegal U.S. marijuana farming, with much of it exported to other states from thousands of sites hidden deep inside forested federal land, and more on private property, law enforcement officials said. The state is still developing a licensing system for growers even though legal retail sales of the drug will begin next year, and medical use has been allowed for decades.
Ecologist Mourad Gabriel, who documents the issue for the Forest Service as well as other state, local and federal law enforcement agencies, estimates California's forests hold 41 times more solid fertilizers and 80 times more liquid pesticides than Forest Service investigators found in 2013.
Response to Rollo (Original post)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Rollo
(2,559 posts)More from article:
Use of toxics has grown over the past three to four years, and chemicals have been found at sites in Oregon and Washington as well, said Chris Boehm, the Forest Service's assistant director for enforcement and investigation. "In the last couple years we've lost a lot of the ground we had picked up in eradicating and cleaning up the new sites we find."
And Oregon apparently is not the paragon of legal pot growing some might think:
Use of toxics has grown over the past three to four years, and chemicals have been found at sites in Oregon and Washington as well, said Chris Boehm, the Forest Service's assistant director for enforcement and investigation. "In the last couple years we've lost a lot of the ground we had picked up in eradicating and cleaning up the new sites we find."
And legalization doesn't work for those who prefer to operate illegally even in a state where it's legal:
As California moves to license growers, officials plan to regulate the use of chemicals. But rules can only be enforced against those who cultivate pot legally. "There are a lot of incentives for continuing to grow illegally," said Washington Fish and Wildlife Deputy Chief Mike Cenci, citing growers' distaste for taxes and red tape. "We've got 4,000 illegal grows in our county," said Keith Groves, a supervisor of Trinity County in Northern California. "I'll be happy if we can get 500 of them to become licensed."
.
Response to Rollo (Reply #2)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
theaocp
(4,243 posts)The writer and poster either know or should know they are comparing illegal cannabis production and legal operations in states that have legalized. The fact they say, "industry" is designed to get people thinking about the legal states and nothing else. Pure propaganda from the outset.
Rollo
(2,559 posts)So sue me.
.
Response to Rollo (Reply #15)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Rollo
(2,559 posts)"We've got 4,000 illegal grows in our county," said Keith Groves, a supervisor of Trinity County in Northern California. "I'll be happy if we can get 500 of them to become licensed."
From article linked in the OP
Response to Rollo (Reply #28)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Flaleftist
(3,473 posts)Can anyone guess?
Response to Flaleftist (Reply #4)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Flaleftist
(3,473 posts)Oh wait.....yes, that was it.
ck4829
(35,079 posts)Then all of the sudden "toxic waste!" will become "toxic waste? That's just something liberals made up because they hate business!"
yardwork
(61,686 posts)Rollo
(2,559 posts)Because some growers want to circumvent the regulations and taxes. And they've had years of experience doing just that. Evidently they don't care about the environment if it cuts into their profits.
Egnever
(21,506 posts)Currently there is still a market for their product in the states where it is still illegal. They aren't selling to the dispensaries.
theaocp
(4,243 posts)that doesn't give any more functionality to the black market.
Weekend Warrior
(1,301 posts)theaocp
(4,243 posts)this is just too obvious. I'm hoping for something that scared, irrational Muricans would think about, so the ONLY path forward is regulated recreational/medicinal use.
Weekend Warrior
(1,301 posts)Not the irrational American.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/196550/support-legal-marijuana.aspx
We are already at the tipping point and changes are a happening.
theaocp
(4,243 posts)B2G
(9,766 posts)Not so much anymore because alcohol was legalized.
Rollo
(2,559 posts)It goes on today by people trying to gain excess profits by avoiding the taxes.
And legalization of pot won't fix this, because it will be done on a state by state basis, with varying tariffs and regulations. That's what drives cigarette smuggling and I figure it will also drive pot smuggling no matter how legal and regulated it becomes.
Cities, counties, and states are seeing dollar signs with the pot legalization trend... and their greed will keep on driving the illegal grows and sales.
Response to Rollo (Reply #27)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to Rollo (Reply #27)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Weekend Warrior
(1,301 posts)The scope of legalization will also have to be similar across states. It must be recreational. It's the only way to stop the damage being done.
Rollo
(2,559 posts)...there likely will still be illegal growers who refuse to get licensed and pay taxes. They know how to get away with this undetected until they've harvested their crop and made their $$$.
It will take, perhaps, awareness on the part of consumers to refuse to buy unlabeled/certified/taxed pot, as well as, I hate to say, concerted law enforcement.
Of course it's all moot if Sessions has his way and shuts it all down.
Weekend Warrior
(1,301 posts)That's what agencies are for.
It's not a solid argument.
Once their consumer base dries up they will struggle.
Rollo
(2,559 posts)"There are a lot of incentives for continuing to grow illegally," said Washington Fish and Wildlife Deputy Chief Mike Cenci, citing growers' distaste for taxes and red tape.
Let me ask some of those who have got their panties in a twist over this thread:
If you were hiking in a national forest, and came across what is obviously an illegal commercial grow operation, would you:
1) Get the hell out of there and report it to the Forest Service
2) Get out of there and keep your mouth shut
3) Gather some samples and tell all your friends
4) Contact the grower(s) and try to buy at a discount
?
Response to Rollo (Reply #29)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Rollo
(2,559 posts)Response to Rollo (Reply #18)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Calculating
(2,957 posts)It's not a downside of the pot industry, it's a downside of illegal unregistered grows. Only more legalization will fix this kind of stuff. Right now, there's still a ton of states where weed isn't legal, and they're the customers buying the black market stuff from Cali. I fully believe that law enforcement should continue to raid and shut down illegal grows in legal states to stop these problems. No excuse to do things illegally in a state where you can legally grow in a responsible way.
Response to Calculating (Reply #22)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Expecting Rain
(811 posts)Please stop.
Rollo
(2,559 posts)Response to Rollo (Reply #35)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.