Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Go Lego! (Original Post) JimGinPA Aug 2017 OP
Except that today, 99% of LEGOs are in those overpriced "kits" Sinistrous Sep 2017 #1
Sorry Lego's Business Model Offends You... JimGinPA Sep 2017 #2
If you care to read my response, Sinistrous Sep 2017 #4
Actually, I Read Your Post Thoroughly... JimGinPA Sep 2017 #8
Those overpriced kits got turned into much cooler stuff, the same way we kids played with our legos FSogol Sep 2017 #14
My nieces and nephews love Legos. smirkymonkey Sep 2017 #3
... Warren DeMontague Sep 2017 #5
... beam me up scottie Sep 2017 #7
LOL! smirkymonkey Sep 2017 #12
... smirkymonkey Sep 2017 #13
That sounds like a bunch of European liberal clap trap! progressoid Sep 2017 #6
This was really forward thinking for the time. beam me up scottie Sep 2017 #9
When My Older Boy Was Four... JimGinPA Sep 2017 #10
Awesome. beam me up scottie Sep 2017 #11

Sinistrous

(4,249 posts)
1. Except that today, 99% of LEGOs are in those overpriced "kits"
Fri Sep 1, 2017, 12:45 AM
Sep 2017

instead of the big general purpose boxes that had LEGOs you could make into anything you wanted.

Sinistrous

(4,249 posts)
4. If you care to read my response,
Fri Sep 1, 2017, 02:58 AM
Sep 2017

you may notice that I was addressing the diminished creativity encouraged by the one-toy-and-out kits sold by Lego for the past several years. If you care to re-read your OP, you may notice that your lead was praising the creativity enabled by the Lego sets sold in the 1970s.

"Business Model" What an important sounding term.

JimGinPA

(14,811 posts)
8. Actually, I Read Your Post Thoroughly...
Fri Sep 1, 2017, 04:04 AM
Sep 2017

Obtuse as it was.

Lego still sells their creative sets in several sizes. Apparently the demand for the kits is greater, thus their business model. Give 'em what they want.

While I understand the point you tried to make I just disagree. I don't know, maybe I spend more time around kids than you, but I've found after the first couple of times putting the sets together their imagination lets them become very creative with their Legos. Pieces are misplaced and sets get mixed together but they still have fun playing with them. That doesn't mean they won't want the next 'Batman Lego Movie" or 'Frozen Ice Castle' set. (Those just happen to be the last ones I bought)

But that really wasn't the point either. The reason I posted this was I found it compelling that a company was forward-thinking enough in the 70's to recommend the freedom from societal gender norms in their "creative" play.

FSogol

(45,481 posts)
14. Those overpriced kits got turned into much cooler stuff, the same way we kids played with our legos
Fri Sep 1, 2017, 08:17 AM
Sep 2017

back in the day. Providing a starting point for the narrative doesn't remove the creativity.

 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
3. My nieces and nephews love Legos.
Fri Sep 1, 2017, 02:37 AM
Sep 2017

Especially one nephew. He is a genius at putting together Lego kits. He can do it without even looking at the directions in record time. I think the kid has a future as an engineer of some kind.

Of course, his parents get sick of stepping on the pieces all over the house, but they still encourage his creativity.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
9. This was really forward thinking for the time.
Fri Sep 1, 2017, 04:21 AM
Sep 2017

I remember being given dolls and tea sets as a child and even though I didn't understand why, I always felt like I was being insulted. My parents eventually learned to let me play with 'boys' toys and role play as a male if that's what I wanted. There really weren't many strong independent female leads to look up to so I preferred to be Tarzan instead of Jane and Mr. Spock instead of Lt. Uhuru. I played cowboys and cars with my brothers and neither of my parents thought anything of it. But they were liberal pinko commies, most kids weren't as fortunate as I was.

JimGinPA

(14,811 posts)
10. When My Older Boy Was Four...
Fri Sep 1, 2017, 04:38 AM
Sep 2017

I took him to get his Halloween costume. He wanted a Power Ranger costume (they were big then). I let him pick the one he wanted & he chose the yellow one. I didn't know much about them but when I got home my wife (who did know a little about them) kind of freaked out on me telling me the yellow one was a girl. I said "so what, he wanted the yellow one". And that's what he wore trick or treating. He didn't care that it was supposed to be a girl. And neither did anyone else.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
11. Awesome.
Fri Sep 1, 2017, 05:16 AM
Sep 2017

Kids have enough crap to deal with outside the home, parents shouldn't make them feel guilty or ashamed for their choice of costumes or toys.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Go Lego!