General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDear Republican: Willard's 'felony' problem in a nutshell
Last edited Sun Jul 15, 2012, 10:37 PM - Edit history (5)
Edit - Originally posted to ask for editing help in responding to an (R) family member who wanted to know why the Bain employment dates were causing such a ruckus, and why people were saying Romney might have committed a felony. Thank you to everyone who gave input! This is what I sent. Fingers crossed that it makes a dent.
Position #1 is that he left Bain in February 1999.
- This would gel with the contractual requirements of the Salt Lake City Olympics, because they had a requirement that he sever all ties to any entity doing business with a company who sponsors or financially supports the games by February 11, 1999, or he would be in breach of that contract.
- This is what he also told the Federal Election Commission (FEC) in 2011 when he filed his disclosures to run for President.
Position #2 is that he left Bain in 2002
- This is what he told the State of Massachusetts in sworn testimony to justify his residency in the state so that he could run for Governor, as he actually lived in Utah at the time.
- This is what is listed on all SEC filings from 1999-2002. He signed all regulatory filings as the CEO, President, Board Chairman and Sole Stockholder for Bain during this time.
Why this is a problem:
- The FEC and SEC are federal entities, and filing false information with either is a felony. He filed mutually exclusive statements with these entities, and if one is true, the other is a lie as both cannot coexist.
- Bain did a lot of lousy stuff during that 3 year window: becoming an industry leader in sending US jobs to Asia and India (outsourcing), taking out debt and bankrupting companies they bought, and wiping out the pensions of tens of thousands of people - who were then made whole/partially whole on the backs of US taxpayers in bailouts. In one noted case, Bain made $102 million in shuttering a company, where they could have made $80 million and left the pensions intact rather than letting the US taxpayers pick up the tab for that. Romney wants to distance himself from these activities after the fact.
- Of special note to you, look up Stericycle. This company specializes in medical waste, and part of their role is the disposal of aborted fetuses. You can see in google that in <state>, Stericycle is only located in <city> and <city> - where Planned Parenthood offers abortion services. Romney and Bain invested millions (believed $8 million of a $75 million investment consortium) in Stericycle in November of 1999. Doubtful he wants that out there.
Now, his campaign is trying to sell the public on the fact that he drew an annual salary in excess of $100k from Bain from 1999-2002 (exact amount unknown, $100k+ is from his election disclosure filings to the FEC) - while not doing anything at Bain. No work, no phone calls, no board meetings, and no involvement in decisions. He was just paid to sign SEC papers on what the people who worked for him were doing - without any oversight or approval from him. That is enough to write a few headlines, and if they ever publish a list of where these 6 figure jobs are, I will hold you a spot in line.
I asked a few folks to fact check me and help me put this into a clear format, and I hope it untangles a bit as to why this is such a big deal. Happy to provide you with links to back up anything I have included in this if you want to dig in any further.[/font]
RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)MA and all the while being the "legal CEO" so he could continue to reap profits and a big salary. The guy is an ultra-slimeball.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)Still, voted for McCain in 2008 - was not happy about it, but did it. Painting him as "aggressive businessman" or "greedy" isn't going to cut it. I need to show a true character failure, not just an opinion.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)1) Romney signed formal legal documents saying that he was CEO and President of Bain during those years. He got paid more than 100k a year during those years.
2) Romney now says that he did NO WORK WHATSOEVER for Bain during those same years, during which they paid him over 100k a year.
3) Bottom line: Mitt believes that the rules are different for CEOs and the super rich. Apparently you can be CEO, get paid 100k, and then also claim that you do absolutely NO WORK for the company during that same period. Could any of us get a gig like that? Absolutely not. A 100k salary for doing NOTHING.
That is the America Romney knows .... one set of rules for HIM, a different sent of rules for everyone else.
RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)I hope this is enough to get her to ask me about the tax return issues/questions.
karynnj
(59,504 posts)Investors have been known to check who is leading a company before investing. If he was uninvolved, it was wrong to deceive any investor who bought trusting that he was in charge.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)I am not going to have her attention on the moral/ethical/character challenges. She knows he is a louse.
The "no work" thing is awesome. I will work that in as it does stress the point though.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)He profited off of factory closures and profited from outsourcing.
Spazito
(50,365 posts)I would use "shipped American jobs to India, China, etc," instead of "outsource/ offshore. Those two words aren't always clear as to what they mean.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)Exactly why I wanted some more eyes on this. I know she won't know FEC by its initials, and figured I missed a few others that here would be assumptions, but may need to be made more clear.
Spazito
(50,365 posts)In order for Romney to sign on to the Olympics he had to sever ties with any companies that do business with them and he had to sever those ties by February 11, 1999. If he did not sever those ties, which a number of documents are now showing he did not, then he would be in breach of the contract he signed with the Olympics if any of the Bain companies did do business with them.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)Thank you so much for your help!
Spazito
(50,365 posts)silverweb
(16,402 posts)[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]Bookmarking this for reference in case it comes up with family during vacation later this month.
Nice job.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)I wish us BOTH the best in trying to pry them loose.
Happyhippychick
(8,379 posts)and he may have lied about that too.
The Magistrate
(95,247 posts)And he did....
"Romney loves America like a tick loves a dog."
silverweb
(16,402 posts)[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]"Romney loves America like a tick loves a dog."
I don't believe I've ever seen it put quite so accurately and succinctly at the same time.
Delish!
malaise
(269,054 posts)Love it.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)My link for that is Rachel's show from last night when she had the segment on the debate when he was running - and interviewed the woman he was running against.
Rachel said something about people being uneasy back then about some-guy-from-Utah-that-wanted-to-be-governor and "sworn testimony" using Bain to prove residency, but I wasn't totally clear about the implications of that (or ramifications of an after the fact breach of the Olympics contract).
I originally had in the OP that the person who asked hates politics, and I didn't want to overwhelm her with too much detail (or links, unless she asks for them), but would like to understand that myself.
If he misrepresented to the State of MA to get approval to run - is that also a crime like the federal filing lies?
Wounded Bear
(58,666 posts)are in the state constitution. Misrepresentation must be a violation of some kind.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)and to do that he had to show that he was a resident of Massachusetts for seven years prior to running for governor. That was a problem because he spent 3 years in Utah, and filed his taxes there (just an oversight, of course).
I don't know what the legalities are, but it seems a charge of perjury would be possible.
liam_laddie
(1,321 posts)Here's another felony - false voter registration, in MA -$10k fine, five years as a guest of the State. May also be a Federal felony.
Following in the foot-steps of several Rethug luminaries: Ann Coulter (FL or CT?), Rush Limpballz (FL or NY?), Bush 41 (ME or TX?), Cheney (TX or WY?). WTF? They can't recall where they reside? Would fit the R profile - dumbass. It's worth reading the reader comments for more viewpoints and references.
http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2011/06/did-mitt-romney-commit-voter-fraud
scheming daemons
(25,487 posts)Too long.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)This is an intelligent woman, who will read and respond to this - or I wouldn't have bothered. She just avoids politics because she hates the topic.
scheming daemons
(25,487 posts)Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)Because if you approach them with that attitude, you will lose and do more damage than good. Those of us who have worked GOTV efforts realize that a lot of people may be willing to listen - depending on how you approach them.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Either way he committed a felony.
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)I appreciate the good folks here helping clean it up for a non-liberal reader. Do with it as you choose.
mac56
(17,569 posts)Thanks.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)February 11, 1999 contract date: Romney will have to sever ties with any companies that do business with the games.
http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/default.aspx?pageid=438&n=romney-hired-to-lead-salt-lake-games-from-scandal-1999-02-13
Run for President of the US
Federal disclosure filing 2011:
http://pfds.opensecrets.org/N00000286_2010_pres.pdf
Run for Governor of MA:
State of MA Election disclosure filing 2001:
http://romneyfacts.com/assets/Personal%20Financial%20Forms/Personal%20finances/SFI/2001%20SFI%20WMR.pdf
State of MA Election disclosure filing 2002:
http://www.romneyfacts.com/assets/Personal%20Financial%20Forms/Personal%20finances/SFI/2002%20SFI%20WMR.pdf
Sample SEC Filings 1999-2002:
2000: http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/892058/000092701600002483/0000927016-00-002483-0001.txt
2001: http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1054290/000092701601001009/0000927016-01-001009-0001.txt
AmPad bankruptcy:
Bain invested $5 million, made $100 million, taxpayers bailed out the pension fund:
http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns-haberman/2012/05/bankruptcy-report-on-bainowned-ampad-creditors-repaid-124072.html
Stericycle:
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/07/romney-bain-abortion-stericycle-sec
$100k+ "salary" for doing nothing at Bain (retroactive retirement):
http://blogs.bostonmagazine.com/boston_daily/2012/07/16/mitt-romney-retirement-bain-capital/
geckosfeet
(9,644 posts)However - too many expansive thoughts for the average teabag-thing to wrap its head around.
Botany
(70,516 posts)Mitt lied to either the SEC or the FEC in papers that he filed.
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)without any negativity, respectful.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)She thinks they are all crooks (and I don't want to even say what she thinks about Obama ) so I tried to keep the editorializing to a minimum and just stick to the facts that are known at this point. Stericycle will likely be all it takes to keep her home in November - but I am working on her.
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)I love good communication, really I salute you -- it is so worth
the effort, to find the cracks where the light gets in. I believe
there's a path to every person's conscience & heart.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)Patiod
(11,816 posts)This is the clearest explanation I've seen yet.
bucolic_frolic
(43,181 posts)is to convince the voting public, especially independents, that this REALLY REALLY MATTERS
This has more fingerprints than AWOL 2000
and is not something fabricated like Swiftboat or even Whitewater
and it's not something in his private life like an affair.
It is something tangible, with facts, with MAJOR LEAGUE legal consequences
akin to Watergate Coverup.
Focus on nothing else, Democrats. Stop patting yourselves on the back
and high-fiving ....
Selling these truthful matters to the voting public is ALL THAT MATTERS
from now until November.
Go join your local Democratic County Committee, volunteer, talk, make phone calls,
get out in public, offer your services to the Democratic Party without question
for 19 weeks.
GO! Grab the phone book, call them NOW!!
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)What is Willard Romney hiding - that is so much more damaging than the hits from keeping all of this a secret?
barbtries
(28,799 posts)let us know the response if you can...
B Calm
(28,762 posts)Tumbulu
(6,290 posts)I really did not fully understand the whole thing before. Now it's YIKES!
You did such a great job of making it really clear. Thanks you for posting this for all of us to perhaps use with others!
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)The Olympics contract date posted by Spazito upthread really hit me as to why the Willard campaign is so damn adamant about this. Not sure why its important, but that piece of the puzzle really seems to be driving alot of this insistence of Feb 1999 Feb 1999 Feb 1999 Feb 1999.