Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 09:21 PM Jul 2012

Dear Republican: Willard's 'felony' problem in a nutshell

Last edited Sun Jul 15, 2012, 10:37 PM - Edit history (5)

Edit - Originally posted to ask for editing help in responding to an (R) family member who wanted to know why the Bain employment dates were causing such a ruckus, and why people were saying Romney might have committed a felony. Thank you to everyone who gave input! This is what I sent. Fingers crossed that it makes a dent.



[font color=navy]Governor Romney's claims about his tenure at Bain for 1999-2002 differ depending on who is asking (and why). These claims are not just fudging dates - they are mutually exclusive and potentially federal felonies. Martha Stewart was put in jail, not for insider trading, but for lying about it - so that is why you heard the uproar about "potential felony" thrown out there.

Position #1 is that he left Bain in February 1999.

  • This would gel with the contractual requirements of the Salt Lake City Olympics, because they had a requirement that he sever all ties to any entity doing business with a company who sponsors or financially supports the games by February 11, 1999, or he would be in breach of that contract.

  • This is what he also told the Federal Election Commission (FEC) in 2011 when he filed his disclosures to run for President.

Position #2 is that he left Bain in 2002

  • This is what he told the State of Massachusetts in sworn testimony to justify his residency in the state so that he could run for Governor, as he actually lived in Utah at the time.

  • This is what is listed on all SEC filings from 1999-2002. He signed all regulatory filings as the CEO, President, Board Chairman and Sole Stockholder for Bain during this time.

Why this is a problem:

  1. The FEC and SEC are federal entities, and filing false information with either is a felony. He filed mutually exclusive statements with these entities, and if one is true, the other is a lie as both cannot coexist.

  2. Bain did a lot of lousy stuff during that 3 year window: becoming an industry leader in sending US jobs to Asia and India (outsourcing), taking out debt and bankrupting companies they bought, and wiping out the pensions of tens of thousands of people - who were then made whole/partially whole on the backs of US taxpayers in bailouts. In one noted case, Bain made $102 million in shuttering a company, where they could have made $80 million and left the pensions intact rather than letting the US taxpayers pick up the tab for that. Romney wants to distance himself from these activities after the fact.

  3. Of special note to you, look up Stericycle. This company specializes in medical waste, and part of their role is the disposal of aborted fetuses. You can see in google that in <state>, Stericycle is only located in <city> and <city> - where Planned Parenthood offers abortion services. Romney and Bain invested millions (believed $8 million of a $75 million investment consortium) in Stericycle in November of 1999. Doubtful he wants that out there.

Now, his campaign is trying to sell the public on the fact that he drew an annual salary in excess of $100k from Bain from 1999-2002 (exact amount unknown, $100k+ is from his election disclosure filings to the FEC) - while not doing anything at Bain. No work, no phone calls, no board meetings, and no involvement in decisions. He was just paid to sign SEC papers on what the people who worked for him were doing - without any oversight or approval from him. That is enough to write a few headlines, and if they ever publish a list of where these 6 figure jobs are, I will hold you a spot in line.

I asked a few folks to fact check me and help me put this into a clear format, and I hope it untangles a bit as to why this is such a big deal. Happy to provide you with links to back up anything I have included in this if you want to dig in any further.[/font]


45 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dear Republican: Willard's 'felony' problem in a nutshell (Original Post) Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 OP
The rotten SOB wanted it BOTH WAYS for personal gain. 1999 for the Olympics, and 2002 to be Gov. of RBInMaine Jul 2012 #1
This person loathed Palin. Cringed at her name. Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #6
I'll make it simple ... JoePhilly Jul 2012 #2
He got MUCH more than 100K which is why he won't release the tax returns for those years. RBInMaine Jul 2012 #3
Yes, that was "$100k and up" Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #9
Good - but should add that his name in the SEC filing is important karynnj Jul 2012 #5
What started this was the "felon" remark. Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #7
And Romney was the sole owner of Bain, owned 100% of the stock, profited off of everything Bain did. Tx4obama Jul 2012 #17
It looks good to me, one suggestion though... Spazito Jul 2012 #4
Good point! Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #8
One other point you might want to make is related to the dates and the Olympics... Spazito Jul 2012 #10
Excellent. Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #11
You're very welcome! Spazito Jul 2012 #12
Excellent summary. silverweb Jul 2012 #13
Wow - glad you thought that might help. Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #16
I could be wrong but i think he also needed to prove MA residency in order to run for governor Happyhippychick Jul 2012 #14
Yes, Ma'am, He Did The Magistrate Jul 2012 #15
May I use that line, Sir? silverweb Jul 2012 #22
That's a beautiful sentence malaise Jul 2012 #39
That is the one piece I am not clear on. Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #19
I would assume that the qualifications for Gov... Wounded Bear Jul 2012 #25
He had to prove his eligibility... truebluegreen Jul 2012 #29
"Mother Jones" June 13 - article liam_laddie Jul 2012 #40
No republican will read that many words scheming daemons Jul 2012 #18
How kind of you. Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #21
"Intelligent" and "republican" can't coexist in the same individually scheming daemons Jul 2012 #41
Then never try to convince one to see things your way. Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #42
That pretty much sums it up Cali_Democrat Jul 2012 #20
May I use this on my FB page for all my wingnut 'friends'? coalition_unwilling Jul 2012 #23
By all means. Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #24
I reprinted too, with attribution, on my blog. mac56 Jul 2012 #30
I didn't include links, but you may want to: Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #32
Great synopsis. Thanks for the effort. geckosfeet Jul 2012 #26
Great job Botany Jul 2012 #27
great job, nicely written Voice for Peace Jul 2012 #28
The reason this person hates politics is the negativity. Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #33
it's an art Voice for Peace Jul 2012 #34
Yeah, that. Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #37
Thanks for this - clear and useful Patiod Jul 2012 #31
Thanks for a MittLoad of the problem ... Now Democrats problem ... bucolic_frolic Jul 2012 #35
That, or all "Democrats" need to do is keep repeating the question: Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #36
very well done. barbtries Jul 2012 #38
Typical con artist. . B Calm Jul 2012 #43
Wow, thank you so much! Tumbulu Jul 2012 #44
I am glad to hear that! It helped me also, to line it up. Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #45
 

RBInMaine

(13,570 posts)
1. The rotten SOB wanted it BOTH WAYS for personal gain. 1999 for the Olympics, and 2002 to be Gov. of
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 09:28 PM
Jul 2012

MA and all the while being the "legal CEO" so he could continue to reap profits and a big salary. The guy is an ultra-slimeball.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
6. This person loathed Palin. Cringed at her name.
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 09:47 PM
Jul 2012

Still, voted for McCain in 2008 - was not happy about it, but did it. Painting him as "aggressive businessman" or "greedy" isn't going to cut it. I need to show a true character failure, not just an opinion.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
2. I'll make it simple ...
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 09:28 PM
Jul 2012

1) Romney signed formal legal documents saying that he was CEO and President of Bain during those years. He got paid more than 100k a year during those years.

2) Romney now says that he did NO WORK WHATSOEVER for Bain during those same years, during which they paid him over 100k a year.

3) Bottom line: Mitt believes that the rules are different for CEOs and the super rich. Apparently you can be CEO, get paid 100k, and then also claim that you do absolutely NO WORK for the company during that same period. Could any of us get a gig like that? Absolutely not. A 100k salary for doing NOTHING.

That is the America Romney knows .... one set of rules for HIM, a different sent of rules for everyone else.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
9. Yes, that was "$100k and up"
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 09:52 PM
Jul 2012

I hope this is enough to get her to ask me about the tax return issues/questions.

karynnj

(59,504 posts)
5. Good - but should add that his name in the SEC filing is important
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 09:40 PM
Jul 2012

Investors have been known to check who is leading a company before investing. If he was uninvolved, it was wrong to deceive any investor who bought trusting that he was in charge.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
7. What started this was the "felon" remark.
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 09:49 PM
Jul 2012

I am not going to have her attention on the moral/ethical/character challenges. She knows he is a louse.

The "no work" thing is awesome. I will work that in as it does stress the point though.

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
17. And Romney was the sole owner of Bain, owned 100% of the stock, profited off of everything Bain did.
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 11:09 PM
Jul 2012

He profited off of factory closures and profited from outsourcing.

Spazito

(50,365 posts)
4. It looks good to me, one suggestion though...
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 09:34 PM
Jul 2012

I would use "shipped American jobs to India, China, etc," instead of "outsource/ offshore. Those two words aren't always clear as to what they mean.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
8. Good point!
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 09:50 PM
Jul 2012

Exactly why I wanted some more eyes on this. I know she won't know FEC by its initials, and figured I missed a few others that here would be assumptions, but may need to be made more clear.

Spazito

(50,365 posts)
10. One other point you might want to make is related to the dates and the Olympics...
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 10:01 PM
Jul 2012

In order for Romney to sign on to the Olympics he had to sever ties with any companies that do business with them and he had to sever those ties by February 11, 1999. If he did not sever those ties, which a number of documents are now showing he did not, then he would be in breach of the contract he signed with the Olympics if any of the Bain companies did do business with them.

silverweb

(16,402 posts)
13. Excellent summary.
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 10:24 PM
Jul 2012

[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]Bookmarking this for reference in case it comes up with family during vacation later this month.

Nice job.



Happyhippychick

(8,379 posts)
14. I could be wrong but i think he also needed to prove MA residency in order to run for governor
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 10:57 PM
Jul 2012

and he may have lied about that too.

silverweb

(16,402 posts)
22. May I use that line, Sir?
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:24 AM
Jul 2012

[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]"Romney loves America like a tick loves a dog."

I don't believe I've ever seen it put quite so accurately and succinctly at the same time.

Delish!

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
19. That is the one piece I am not clear on.
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 11:12 PM
Jul 2012

My link for that is Rachel's show from last night when she had the segment on the debate when he was running - and interviewed the woman he was running against.

Rachel said something about people being uneasy back then about some-guy-from-Utah-that-wanted-to-be-governor and "sworn testimony" using Bain to prove residency, but I wasn't totally clear about the implications of that (or ramifications of an after the fact breach of the Olympics contract).

I originally had in the OP that the person who asked hates politics, and I didn't want to overwhelm her with too much detail (or links, unless she asks for them), but would like to understand that myself.

If he misrepresented to the State of MA to get approval to run - is that also a crime like the federal filing lies?

Wounded Bear

(58,666 posts)
25. I would assume that the qualifications for Gov...
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:45 AM
Jul 2012

are in the state constitution. Misrepresentation must be a violation of some kind.

 

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)
29. He had to prove his eligibility...
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:55 PM
Jul 2012

and to do that he had to show that he was a resident of Massachusetts for seven years prior to running for governor. That was a problem because he spent 3 years in Utah, and filed his taxes there (just an oversight, of course).

I don't know what the legalities are, but it seems a charge of perjury would be possible.

liam_laddie

(1,321 posts)
40. "Mother Jones" June 13 - article
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 09:48 PM
Jul 2012

Here's another felony - false voter registration, in MA -$10k fine, five years as a guest of the State. May also be a Federal felony.
Following in the foot-steps of several Rethug luminaries: Ann Coulter (FL or CT?), Rush Limpballz (FL or NY?), Bush 41 (ME or TX?), Cheney (TX or WY?). WTF? They can't recall where they reside? Would fit the R profile - dumbass. It's worth reading the reader comments for more viewpoints and references.

http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2011/06/did-mitt-romney-commit-voter-fraud

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
21. How kind of you.
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 11:13 PM
Jul 2012

This is an intelligent woman, who will read and respond to this - or I wouldn't have bothered. She just avoids politics because she hates the topic.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
42. Then never try to convince one to see things your way.
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 10:48 PM
Jul 2012

Because if you approach them with that attitude, you will lose and do more damage than good. Those of us who have worked GOTV efforts realize that a lot of people may be willing to listen - depending on how you approach them.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
24. By all means.
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 12:43 AM
Jul 2012

I appreciate the good folks here helping clean it up for a non-liberal reader. Do with it as you choose.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
32. I didn't include links, but you may want to:
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 06:54 PM
Jul 2012

geckosfeet

(9,644 posts)
26. Great synopsis. Thanks for the effort.
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 07:24 AM
Jul 2012

However - too many expansive thoughts for the average teabag-thing to wrap its head around.

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
33. The reason this person hates politics is the negativity.
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 06:57 PM
Jul 2012

She thinks they are all crooks (and I don't want to even say what she thinks about Obama ) so I tried to keep the editorializing to a minimum and just stick to the facts that are known at this point. Stericycle will likely be all it takes to keep her home in November - but I am working on her.

 

Voice for Peace

(13,141 posts)
34. it's an art
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 07:11 PM
Jul 2012

I love good communication, really I salute you -- it is so worth
the effort, to find the cracks where the light gets in. I believe
there's a path to every person's conscience & heart.



bucolic_frolic

(43,181 posts)
35. Thanks for a MittLoad of the problem ... Now Democrats problem ...
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 07:31 PM
Jul 2012

is to convince the voting public, especially independents, that this REALLY REALLY MATTERS

This has more fingerprints than AWOL 2000

and is not something fabricated like Swiftboat or even Whitewater

and it's not something in his private life like an affair.

It is something tangible, with facts, with MAJOR LEAGUE legal consequences

akin to Watergate Coverup.

Focus on nothing else, Democrats. Stop patting yourselves on the back
and high-fiving ....

Selling these truthful matters to the voting public is ALL THAT MATTERS

from now until November.

Go join your local Democratic County Committee, volunteer, talk, make phone calls,
get out in public, offer your services to the Democratic Party without question
for 19 weeks.

GO! Grab the phone book, call them NOW!!

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
36. That, or all "Democrats" need to do is keep repeating the question:
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 07:34 PM
Jul 2012

What is Willard Romney hiding - that is so much more damaging than the hits from keeping all of this a secret?

Tumbulu

(6,290 posts)
44. Wow, thank you so much!
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 11:09 PM
Jul 2012

I really did not fully understand the whole thing before. Now it's YIKES!

You did such a great job of making it really clear. Thanks you for posting this for all of us to perhaps use with others!

Ruby the Liberal

(26,219 posts)
45. I am glad to hear that! It helped me also, to line it up.
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 11:29 PM
Jul 2012

The Olympics contract date posted by Spazito upthread really hit me as to why the Willard campaign is so damn adamant about this. Not sure why its important, but that piece of the puzzle really seems to be driving alot of this insistence of Feb 1999 Feb 1999 Feb 1999 Feb 1999.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dear Republican: Willard...