Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 11:09 PM Jul 2012

Egypt remains a puzzle for the U.S.

In the days before U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton arrived here on Saturday, becoming the highest-ranking U.S. official to meet Egypt’s newly elected Islamist President, she planned to deliver a forceful public speech about democracy.

But with the new President still struggling to wrest power from Egypt’s top generals, there were too many questions, too many pitfalls and too little new for Ms. Clinton to offer, said several people briefed on the process. After rejecting at least three different drafts, the administration called off the speech days before its scheduled delivery, these people said.

The administration’s struggle to define a message here reflects its quandary with how to deal with a rapidly shifting contest for power whose outcome remains to be seen. Policymakers are struggling to balance a public push for a democratic Egypt against a desire to maintain long-term ties with factions — the generals and the Islamists — in a context where almost any U.S. statement is sure to provoke a backlash.

The generals have repeatedly rebuffed U.S. pressure. The new President, Mohammed Morsy, and the other leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood still harbour deep doubts about the U.S. agenda. Some of Egypt’s secular politicians are even accusing the U.S., implausibly, of conspiring to back the Brotherhood. A secular political party and a Christian group have called for a protest outside the U.S. Embassy against what they assert to be U.S. support for the Islamists.

All of which has lent what some U.S. officials say is a sense of futility about Washington’s muffled voice in the future of a strategic ally.



http://www.thehindu.com/news/international/article3642968.ece
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Poll_Blind

(23,864 posts)
1. They couldn't find a way to phrase "Honestly, we'd rather be dealing with your previous dictator...
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 11:16 PM
Jul 2012

...than you lot. We don't have you in the bag and we're not certain, yet, whether it'll pan out in the cost/benefit analysis to negotiate with you or help install another dictator to terrorize you for our benefit."

Very difficult to write that speech in a way that has Egyptians clapping at the end of it.

PB

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
3. They also point out that any threat to cut the $1.5 billion in aid is not very credible
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 11:23 PM
Jul 2012

Since $1.3 billion of it is military aid, mostly used to buy stuff from US defense contractors.

 

teddy51

(3,491 posts)
2. One question might be is what doe's Washington know about Democracy anyway? Democracy
Sun Jul 15, 2012, 11:22 PM
Jul 2012

is supposed to be a Government that is "By the people, for the people, and of the people". I somehow think that we have lost our way in this country. Much of the problem lies at the feet of the people, and there is no doubt about that; " American Idol, Fox News, Bill O'Reiley, etc.". We are f**ked big time, and if we represent the rest of the world, the world is f**ked.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Egypt remains a puzzle fo...