Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPolicing the blogs: Why DU is sooooo much better
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/07/16/most-comments-are-horrible-sites-look-for-ways-to-make-them-better.htmlMost Comments Are HorribleSites Look for Ways to Make Them Better
So how should community managers tamp down the vitriol yet keep the discussion alive? Most larger online-news outlets realized long ago that you can have a fully open, democratic commenting space, or you can have intelligent conversationsbut, generally speaking, you cant have both.
...
In general, though, its become clear that the old model of anonymous free-for-all commenting is on its way out. News sites both large and small are requiring online commenters to post an identity, often by connecting them to a Facebook profile.
...
This all sounds very nice, but maintaining that safe space isnt cheap. The New York Times, for instance, also employs a raft of moderatorsthree full-time and 10 part-time. One of the full-timers is Erin Wright, who has been a moderator for the Times for the past five years. Based in Philadelphia, she works from 6 p.m. to 2 a.m. The job, she said, is sort of like coming in and being a referee in the middle of the game.
...
The good news is there really are people out therereaders, consumerswho dont want the sort of propaganda scream-match flame wars of large amounts of the partisan blogosphere, Sullivan said. And if you give them a space to really bring their expertise or their stories or their lives, and make sure that its a safe spaceyou dont abuse them, you dont set them up for mockery, you respect each and every onethen I think we basically got an unpaid staff of about 1.3 million people.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 860 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Policing the blogs: Why DU is sooooo much better (Original Post)
Scuba
Jul 2012
OP
I will simply say, thank gawd we don't let most of the "outside world" see Meta.
hlthe2b
Jul 2012
#1
hlthe2b
(102,291 posts)1. I will simply say, thank gawd we don't let most of the "outside world" see Meta.
The decision to let "anything" go in Meta is depressing to me, but the best decision the admins made was to at least make it available only to paid donors.
tridim
(45,358 posts)2. 2007 was a pretty bad year for DU. I almost left.
But you're right, in general DU is pretty unique. I think it's because our members have always cared about the quality of the forums.