Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Amerigo Vespucci

(30,885 posts)
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 06:44 PM Jul 2012

Steve Schmidt: Palin picked over Romney due to Cindy McCain's shitload of houses, not Mitt's taxes

andrea.stone@huffingtonpost.com

Romney's Wealth, But Not His Tax Returns, Was Factor In McCain's VP Decision, Says Steve Schmidt

Posted: 07/16/2012 5:32 pm Updated: 07/16/2012 5:46 pm



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/16/mitt-romney-tax-returns-n_n_1677556.html?ref=topbar

WASHINGTON -- John McCain's top campaign strategist in 2008 says that Mitt Romney's much-discussed tax returns were not the reason that the Republican candidate chose Sarah Palin as his running mate, but he did acknowledge that Romney's wealth played a factor in the decision.

"I get the political hyperbole and all, but that’s not the way the decision was made," Steve Schmidt told The Huffington Post. "We never sat around having a discussion about Mitt Romney's taxes through the prism of a liability if he were chosen" for the ticket.

But he added that Romney's wealth was seen as a liability - "Sen. McCain got caught flat-footed answering a question about how many houses he owned. In fact, they were Cindy McCain's properties but that distinction was lost in the political optics and we knew it would be a big liability that the presidential and the vice presidential candidates together owned more than a dozen homes. It was like something out of a 'Saturday Night Live' skit. I mean, come on."

***

"It's totally unfair. They don’t know any of the facts," Schmidt said of the inference about Romney's tax returns. "But it's hard to refute. And the bottom line is the American people don’t trust politicians so nobody gets the benefit of the doubt and the utterance of the accusation does damage. People believe you’re hiding something. It's wrong, it's unfair, but it's life in the big leagues.”
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Steve Schmidt: Palin picked over Romney due to Cindy McCain's shitload of houses, not Mitt's taxes (Original Post) Amerigo Vespucci Jul 2012 OP
Did he say "and the taxes aren't hiding anything" Voice for Peace Jul 2012 #1
Also That He Didn't Leak What He Saw To Other Candidates... KharmaTrain Jul 2012 #4
I haven't thought much about that Voice for Peace Jul 2012 #13
I Kinda Like "No Honor Among Theives"... KharmaTrain Jul 2012 #14
LOL.. I donate it to the public domain Voice for Peace Jul 2012 #17
My guess is they never got around to scrutinizing his taxes. Laurian Jul 2012 #2
Steve---you're still a fucking Republican... trumad Jul 2012 #3
Hmmm, hey Steve, Romney IS hiding something, his TAX RETURNS... Spazito Jul 2012 #5
I say Bullshit Politicalboi Jul 2012 #6
It all goes away if Mitt releases his taxes. Simple. Happyhippychick Jul 2012 #7
well, he has no bias now, does he? spanone Jul 2012 #8
LOL emulatorloo Jul 2012 #10
I don't think there will be anything sinister in the tax returns, instead... targetpractice Jul 2012 #9
That's a very possible scenario Amerigo Vespucci Jul 2012 #12
Spoken like the Rove protege that he is. emulatorloo Jul 2012 #11
its unfair that people dont trust politicians Enrique Jul 2012 #15
Not saying that Schmidt is above covering for Rmoney, but Laurian Jul 2012 #16
Sounds like he thinks it MATTERS that the houses were Cindy's. nt Honeycombe8 Jul 2012 #18
I know, right? "Does she lock you out? Release the hounds on you... JHB Jul 2012 #19

KharmaTrain

(31,706 posts)
4. Also That He Didn't Leak What He Saw To Other Candidates...
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 06:55 PM
Jul 2012

Mittens made a lot of enemies during his presidential runs and still doesn't have the full support of his party. Willard makes the prefect sacraficial lamb against an incumbent. For many of Schmidt's rushpublican buddies with presidential aspirations a Rmnoey win this year would derail a lot of other ambitions for 2016 when Obama couldn't run. Thus making him a weak candidate serves some special interests within the rushpublican coven and leaking the dirt on the taxes could be very valuable tool.

 

Voice for Peace

(13,141 posts)
13. I haven't thought much about that
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 07:34 PM
Jul 2012

ie, that political operatives in his own party could be setting
him up, aiding the opposition for their own nefarious reasons.

But it makes sense; and is bound to be an excellent movie,
soon, a political thriller, all the betrayals and schemes and deals
behind the scenes, just within the political party, eating itself
alive in pursuit of omnipotence.

Here's a working title: The Political Party

featuring the religious right, tea baggers, one percenters,
moderate conservatives, sleazy corrupt long time political insiders,
plus all the Moneybags and their minions and subsidiaries,
and Jesus knows who all else, though probably Jesus wasn't
a Republican, and wasn't there, so how would he know, but
anyway, all those members of the Political Party find themselves
together at a party. Maybe it's a party to celebrate their wonderful
diversity. Let's see how well they party.

Murders and mysterious improbable alliances;
incest, family secrets, cult ceremonies,
speaking in tongues, oily deals, magic underwear,
sex in bathroom stalls, crazy people making pledges,
creepy things everywhere. Maybe a horror/thriller.
Maybe it takes place in an insane asylum.




KharmaTrain

(31,706 posts)
14. I Kinda Like "No Honor Among Theives"...
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 07:48 PM
Jul 2012

I like your idea...the greed and egos write the script for you.

The scary part is this is not some sci-fi monster-gone-wild script but real life.

You can bet that Willard didn't shed many tears the day McCain lost...and I suspect that's the same with this year's lot of losers. Good luck on the screenplay.

Cheers!

Laurian

(2,593 posts)
2. My guess is they never got around to scrutinizing his taxes.
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 06:50 PM
Jul 2012

Disqualified by obvious deficiencies/liabilities before they got to the taxes.

Spazito

(50,365 posts)
5. Hmmm, hey Steve, Romney IS hiding something, his TAX RETURNS...
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 06:55 PM
Jul 2012

it isn't just that people believe it, it's a damn fact!

targetpractice

(4,919 posts)
9. I don't think there will be anything sinister in the tax returns, instead...
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 07:08 PM
Jul 2012

…the returns will paint a story of the scope of Mitt's massive severance package from Bain. The returns will allow us to align Mitt's profits against the jobs lost, health plans cancelled, and retirement benefits destroyed by Bain's management practices. Everything will be legal, but it will be ugly.

Amerigo Vespucci

(30,885 posts)
12. That's a very possible scenario
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 07:15 PM
Jul 2012

I don't see Mitt as being afraid of a "smoking gun." As someone on DU pointed out yesterday, this is the guy who bought up and destroyed all of the hard drives used in his run for Governor. I think he's afraid of the American people connecting the dots of his past before he has a chance to ascend to the throne.

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
15. its unfair that people dont trust politicians
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 07:52 PM
Jul 2012

is Steve Schmidt the writer of Hi and Lois,because he is making me laugh.

Laurian

(2,593 posts)
16. Not saying that Schmidt is above covering for Rmoney, but
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 07:54 PM
Jul 2012

thinking back to the 2008 campaign which was before we knew the full extent of the economic meltdown, income inequality was not the hot button issue it is now. His tax information, if it was even analyzed, may not have raised the red flags it would today.

JHB

(37,161 posts)
19. I know, right? "Does she lock you out? Release the hounds on you...
Mon Jul 16, 2012, 08:15 PM
Jul 2012

...if you try to go into the wrong one?"

The only people who care about that distinction are tax accountants and divorce lawyers, John. And you wonder why you lost?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Steve Schmidt: Palin pick...