Nevada law calls this terrorism. Why won't the police

[freddyvh]

The state's statute says an “act of terrorism means any act that involves the use or attempted use of sabotage, coercion or violence which is intended to cause great bodily harm or death to the general population”.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/las-vegas-shooting-nevada-terrorism-state-law-act-police-stephen-paddock-a7978456.html?utm_source=fark&utm_medium=website&utm_content=link&ICID=ref_fark

NRS 202.4415  “Act of terrorism” defined.
1.  “Act of terrorism” means any act that involves the use or attempted use of sabotage, coercion or violence which is intended to:
(a) Cause great bodily harm or death to the general population; or
(b) Cause substantial destruction, contamination or impairment of:
(1) Any building or infrastructure, communications, transportation, utilities or services; or
(2) Any natural resource or the environment.
2.  As used in this section, “coercion” does not include an act of civil disobedience.
(Added to NRS by 2003, 2947)

https://www.leg.state.nv.us/NRS/NRS-202.html#NRS202Sec4415

so why aren't the cops following the state law?

[stonecutter357]

1. K&R

[catbyte]

2. Because, thanks to Republicans, "terrorism" has been perverted to only refer to racial & religious

minorities. Muslims, BLM/Antifa can all be "terrorists", but not crazy white people. It's disgusting & you're correct, goes against state law. If this wasn't terrorism, I don't know what is.

[Caliman73]

3. That is a pretty broad definition but you are right.

They should be using the correct language to describe the crime.

[n2doc]

4. Because