Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
As if there is a connection between the amount of guns in circulation & number of shootings.... (Original Post) kpete Oct 2017 OP
Perhaps hack89 Oct 2017 #1
That chart doesn't show what you think.... sarisataka Oct 2017 #2
Correct. Maybe we need to get the lead out of our water and shooting ranges. L. Coyote Oct 2017 #5
lead- maybe sarisataka Oct 2017 #6
Perhaps it's not per capita gun ownership maxsolomon Oct 2017 #9
I don't think this chart is helpful Ezior Oct 2017 #3
16 million new guns in 2016 alone. L. Coyote Oct 2017 #4
Bad science. GeorgeGist Oct 2017 #7
The gun humpers don't like your post Johonny Oct 2017 #8

hack89

(39,171 posts)
1. Perhaps
Tue Oct 3, 2017, 09:32 AM
Oct 2017

on the other hand over the past 20 years we have seen gun violence plummet in America while gun ownership has increased. It is a complicated picture.

sarisataka

(18,654 posts)
2. That chart doesn't show what you think....
Tue Oct 3, 2017, 09:40 AM
Oct 2017

It actually proves a lack of correlation.

It does show one country is an extreme outlier compared to other countries, some with fairly widespread gun ownership.

We should examine why, with 2x the per capita gun ownership of Switzerland or Finland we have nearly 40x the number of shootings

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
5. Correct. Maybe we need to get the lead out of our water and shooting ranges.
Tue Oct 3, 2017, 10:03 AM
Oct 2017

There is definitely something wrong with American brains, that's what the chart shows.

sarisataka

(18,654 posts)
6. lead- maybe
Tue Oct 3, 2017, 10:31 AM
Oct 2017

I don't really care if the answer is environmental, social or legal I would just like a solution.

I support research like Obama ordered the CDC to do after Sandyhook. Unfortunately it skewered everyone and indicated it may be a complex issue requiring more than a soundbite (more guns/less guns) solution. Because it did not fit any narrative it has gone ignored

Ezior

(505 posts)
3. I don't think this chart is helpful
Tue Oct 3, 2017, 09:54 AM
Oct 2017

because the left chart is per capita, while the one on the right is not. The number of mass shootings should be divided by the number of inhabitants (or "mass shootings / 1,000,000 inhabitants", whatever).

The way it is now, it puts countries with lots of inhabitants at a disadvantage (Germany vs. Austria, US vs. UK, etc.).

Switzerland, Finland might be a surprise after the visualization is corrected to be fair. I'm not sure why that is. Probably not only # of guns is important, but also who owns them (crazy people or sane, educated, trained soldiers/conscripts like in Switzerland?). Also, what's the social security system / safety net in the country? Having a fallback in case your life turns upside down might prevent some psychopaths from snapping.

Edit: Also, what about the level of polarization in the society? If you think that 50% of your fellow citizens are stupid idiots, you might be more likely to just take as many of them as you can with you when you leave this world. I think traditionally Japan and other Asian countries have put "us / community / society" at a higher level than "I / myself / individual needs". It's a 2-sided sword.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»As if there is a connecti...