General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAre Democrats Headed for a McGovern Redux?
Politico:In 1968, as in 2016, Democrats narrowly lost the White House after nominating a relatively moderate, establishment candidate instead of a more liberal alternative who had inspired a raging enthusiasm among younger voters. Democrats spent much of the next four years arguing about what direction the party should take. White working-class voterstraditionally a Democratic blocwere sluicing away, and progressives, convinced the party needed to change both its policy direction and its coalition of supporters, demanded a new approach: a loose peace coalition of minorities, young voters and educated white Democrats, as strategist Fred Dutton wrote in his 1971 book, Changing Sources of Power. One year later, the partys presidential nominee, the ultra-liberal Senator George McGovern of South Dakota, went on to lose 49 states in one of the most lopsided victories in American history.
Were a long, long way from 2020, but its abundantly evident that Trump will again run a Nixonian campaign, tearing down his opponent and presenting himself as the champion of an aggrieved coalition that Nixon called the silent majority and Trump calls the forgotten men and women of America.
Consumed by internecine battles and the idea of opposition, Democrats run the risk of again nominating someone like McGovern who pleases progressives but steers a course too far from the countrys center of political gravity to win, even as Trump continues his funhouse mirror impression of Nixon as the avatar of white cultural-grievance politics.
The critical difference may be whether the Demo nominee can express anger and emotion, as opposed to candidates like McGovern, Mondale and Dukakis.
greeny2323
(590 posts)The press is stuck in the past, like it is forever 1950 and liberals have to stop being liberal to win.
LonePirate
(13,420 posts)Squinch
(50,949 posts)ChoppinBroccoli
(3,784 posts)That's why the people I'm most interested in at this point are Joe Biden (I think he's probably too old to be viable, but I love his fighting spirit) and Joe Kennedy. We need somebody who's not afraid to punch Trump in the mouth (to borrow a euphemism). The PERFECT candidate would be Sherrod Brown, but I've given up on that pipe dream (his wife has threatened to divorce him if he runs for President).
VOX
(22,976 posts)When news came out about Eagletons battle with depression and having undergone ECT (shock) treatments. This forced McGovern to drop Eagleton and plug in Sargent Shriver. But...damage done. In 72, this was a major blow.
Nixon went on to win California, New York, and every other state/district except MA and DC.
This situation wont occur again, if Democrats STICK TOGETHER.
Demsrule86
(68,565 posts)The country has moved center left at best. If we put up a super liberal candidate, we will lose. I say this sadly, but the truth is the truth. We need to win and save the progressive movement...so we need to pick someone who can win. I do think Sherrod Brown could win...and he is very progressive. I think Joe Kennedy could win.