General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThere are members of Congress receiving drugs for Alzheimer's
An old-school pharmacy hand-delivers drugs to Congress, a little-known perk for the powerful
By ERIN MERSHON @eemershon
OCTOBER 11, 2017
....
Nearly every day for at least two decades pharmaceutical drugs have been brought by the carload to the Capitol an arrangement so under the radar that even pharmacy lobbyists who regularly pitch Congress on their industry arent aware of it.
The deliveries arrive at the secretive Office of the Attending Physician, an elaborate medical clinic where Navy doctors triage medical emergencies and provide basic health care for lawmakers who pay an annual fee of just over $600. Every one comes from Washingtons oldest community pharmacy, Grubbs.
........
At first its cool, and then you realize, Im filling some drugs that are for some pretty serious health problems as well. And these are the people that are running the country, Kim said, listing treatments for conditions like diabetes and Alzheimers.
It makes you kind of sit back and say, Wow, theyre making the highest laws of the land and they might not even remember what happened yesterday.'
https://www.statnews.com/2017/10/11/pharmacist-congress-drug-delivery/
Link to tweet
cilla4progress
(24,717 posts)On who?
janterry
(4,429 posts)We all want to stay in the workforce longer these days. But there just has to be a limit. I remember sitting in a room of octogenarians watching them make fun of the barely there Strom Thurmond (he was truly incompetent at the end).
They knew he was too old to be there.
The advantages of the incumbent are just too strong to weed out those whose hearts might still be in it, but minds are clearly not.
groundloop
(11,513 posts)I'd retire today if I could. The biggest obstacle is being able to afford health insurance, Medicare for all would go a long ways toward helping many people be able to retire. I firmly believe this would help the economy as well since this would open the door for more employees to come into higher paying positions.
janterry
(4,429 posts)My understanding of the research (though) was that - often - folks who have had difficult blue collar jobs were anxious to retire and those with more 'white collar' jobs were putting it off.
Though there is great variation, I'm sure, among individuals.
I wonder, too, if everyone had a chance at good health insurance, medicare, reasonable income - it might change what people would choose when they hit 'traditional' retirement. If all those supports were secure, many more might want to formally 'retire.'
Javaman
(62,500 posts)anyone with an ounce of brains would retired if they were able to.
this all about power and ego.
nothing more, nothing less.
kskiska
(27,045 posts)and had to be taken from his bed to Congress to vote.
procon
(15,805 posts)Yeah, maybe it's not legal to make the results public, but damn, shouldn't there be minimum standards with regard to conditions and meds that affect their brains?
QED
(2,747 posts)Phoenix61
(16,993 posts)And I believe boat captains do also. Only makes sense senators, congress persons, heads of agencies and the Pres should have to also.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)I think the public has the right to know if a member of congress is being treated for a debilitating disease like Alzheimer's which will affect their ability to perform their function.
JeaneRaye
(402 posts)These days, I look at the source of the information before believing anything I read. If it comes from a trusted news source I believe it. If it is real, I will read it in other sources. I am talking about sources like the New York Times, Washington Post, Boston Globe, the Guardian, Wall Street Journal... you know, those sources that have fact checkers. If if come from a site that I have never of, well.... you know, I look at it with some skepticism. I don't know this site, statnews.com. Who are they?
progressoid
(49,945 posts)Stat (stylized STAT, sometimes also called Stat News)[1] is a health-oriented news website launched on November 4, 2015 by John W. Henry, the owner of The Boston Globe. It is produced by Boston Globe Media and is headquartered in the Globe's own building in Boston.[2][3] Its executive editor is Rick Berke, who formerly worked at both the New York Times and Politico.[4] According to Kelsey Sutton of Politico, the website is Henry's "biggest and most ambitious standalone site yet".[5] As of February 2016, it had 45 staff members.[3]
https://www.statnews.com/about/
JeaneRaye
(402 posts)Thanks for the info.
progressoid
(49,945 posts)Sometimes I spend more time researching the messenger than reading the message!
blogslut
(37,982 posts)mahatmakanejeeves
(57,290 posts)Not that that's a guarantee or anything, but....
Cheviteau
(383 posts)Wonder how much shit is delivered that's not prescribed.
IronLionZion
(45,380 posts)I know it's a juicy story, but come on. Patients have a right to privacy for their medical issues. A lot of our favorite liberals are not getting any younger.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)Privacy- I'm all for it.
Impaired congresspeople - I am against if , even for those with whom I agree with.
JoeStuckInOH
(544 posts)Never let facts get in the way of a good outrage.
IronLionZion
(45,380 posts)DUers have been outrageous lately without stopping to consider the source.
Sometimes we all need to take a strategic pause.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)do you do HIPPA? LOL
JoeStuckInOH
(544 posts)But come on... it's not the population at large here. Out of 535 people, it can't be too hard to guess whose brains are turning to swiss cheese.
What if your doctor walked into your waiting room where 3 people were sitting and announced: "Someone here has Alzheimer's. Someone here has Cancer. Someone here has HIV. It might all be the same person... or it might be different people."
Is that a HIPAA violation?
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,290 posts)janterry
(4,429 posts)so not necessarily for Alzheimer's or what have you. It's hard to know since an MD can pretty much do as they want...........
murielm99
(30,717 posts)I will wait and see with this story.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)There are too many possibilities to interpret this story without verified facts with confirmations. I think it's irresponsible to whip up hysteria without the entire story. Unfortunately that seems to be the very low standard for journalism these days.
Delmette2.0
(4,157 posts)$600 a year is a screaming deal. It costs $3.7 million a year to run the Office of Attending PhysicIan the 535 members of Congress should be paying $6,915.88 a year.
Then Congress also has 70% of their ACA paid by their employer (taxpayers).
Horse with no Name
(33,956 posts)great gig if you can get it.....
geardaddy
(24,926 posts)IronLionZion
(45,380 posts)Stinky The Clown
(67,761 posts)I can understand concern of lawmakers are taking a drug for Alzheimers. Why did the article lump that in with diabetes? Maybe he should have also listed drugs for hemorrhoids and athlete's feet.
geardaddy
(24,926 posts)kskiska
(27,045 posts)Irish_Dem
(46,492 posts)Our leaders should be held to the same standard as bus drivers and airline pilots.
Beartracks
(12,797 posts)Some drugs commonly prescribed to Alzheimer's patients are also indicated for other medical issues.
===========
Duppers
(28,117 posts)Freethinker65
(9,999 posts)left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)... about passing the torch to a new generation.