Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,874 posts)
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 10:49 AM Oct 2017

Trump weighs in on tearing down Columbus statues: 'What's next? Has to be stopped'

Source: ABC News

Trump weighs in on tearing down Columbus statues: 'What's next? Has to be stopped'

By MARK OSBORNE • Oct 18, 2017, 4:43 AM ET

President Donald Trump waded into a new statue controversy on Tuesday night when he called out people who want to tear down statues of Christopher Columbus.

"We believe we should preserve our history, not tear it down," Trump said in remarks he delivered Tuesday night at the Heritage Foundation's annual President's Club gathering. "Now they are even trying to destroy statues of Christopher Columbus. What's next? Has to be stopped, it's heritage."

Calls for Columbus statues to be torn down have flared up around the country in the wake of similar calls for Confederate statues to be removed. The threat of the removal of a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee in Charlottesville, Virginia incited riots between supporters and protesters and left one woman dead in August.

The Columbus controversy has been most prominent in New York City, where a 76-foot tall statue of the Italian explorer rises over Columbus Circle at the southwest corner of Central Park. The monument, designed by Italian sculptor Gaetano Russo, was officially unveiled in October 1892.

In the wake of the Charlottesville incident, New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio commissioned a 90-day review of all the statues in the city.

-snip-


Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-weighs-tearing-columbus-statues-whats-stopped/story?id=50553722
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Corgigal

(9,291 posts)
1. Lexington Kentucky
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 10:51 AM
Oct 2017

took 2 down last night, quick and now in storage. Trump can buy them and put them on his golf course.

doc03

(35,328 posts)
3. For once I agree with tRump. What is next? We blow up Mount Rushmore or the Crazy Horse
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 11:03 AM
Oct 2017

Memorial. Ohio will have to change the name of our capitol now I suppose. Well we will have to
blow up Grant's tomb because it offends southerners. We have to tear down the Lewis and Clark statue
in St. Lewis because they explored the west and that led to thousands of native Americans getting killed.


lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
4. Yes that is exactly what's next (not Crazy Horse though) and it's about damned time.
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 11:08 AM
Oct 2017

We should be ashamed of our genocidal history and work to remember it as a wrong to be righted, not a glorious thing to be celebrated.

doc03

(35,328 posts)
5. Well what about all the white people Crazy Horse was
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 11:16 AM
Oct 2017

responsible for killing? We have a memorial and other things honoring General Custer near my place, we need to destroy those.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
6. Can you see a distinction between defending ancestral land, and conquering it?
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 11:18 AM
Oct 2017

There is no moral equivalence.

Do you know why the bison were nearly wiped out? It was deliberate genocide, to starve the plains Indians.

doc03

(35,328 posts)
8. But the Indians came from asia and I am
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 12:37 PM
Oct 2017

sure they did their share of killing each other before any white men were here.

Drahthaardogs

(6,843 posts)
14. Monteczuma once had 84,000 sacrificed over a few days
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 06:57 PM
Oct 2017

In honor of himself.

Some say his blood just had the Aztecs far in decline when the Spaniards arrived.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
12. which statues are you alleging have been blown up rather than simply removed?
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 04:21 PM
Oct 2017

Your fallacy 'reductio ad absurdum' is both popular and trendy among the dogmatic and irrational.

It does however, beg a question implicit in your premise: which statues are you alleging have been blown up rather than simply removed?

TBA

(825 posts)
10. Keep the satutes
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 12:56 PM
Oct 2017

and add a sign correctly depicting what he did (wiping out the natives) and correcting the myths. Use them to educate.

Vinca

(50,269 posts)
13. I hope Dear Leader knows if anyone has the bright idea to put up a statue of him we'll be out in
Wed Oct 18, 2017, 05:29 PM
Oct 2017

force personally taking it down. I'd risk jail time to topple a Trump statue . . . unless, of course, we're talking about the "naked Trumps" that appeared during the election. Those were fabulous.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump weighs in on tearin...