Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Sat Oct 21, 2017, 10:05 AM Oct 2017

Republicans Consider Sharp Cut in 401(k) Contribution Limits

By JIM TANKERSLEY OCT. 20, 2017

WASHINGTON — House Republicans are considering a plan to sharply reduce the amount of income American workers can save in tax-deferred retirement accounts as part of a broad effort to rewrite the tax code, according to lobbyists, tax consultants and congressional Democrats.

It is unclear if Republicans will ultimately include a cap on contributions in the tax bill that they are expected to release in the coming weeks. Such a move would almost certainly prompt a vocal backlash from middle-class workers who save heavily in such retirement accounts and from the asset management industry.

The proposals under discussion would potentially cap the annual amount workers can set aside to as low as $2,400 for 401(k) accounts, several lobbyists and consultants said on Friday. Workers may currently put up to $18,000 a year in 401(k) accounts without paying taxes upfront on that money; that figure rises to $24,000 for workers over 50. When workers retire and begin to draw income from those accounts, they pay taxes on the benefits.

Rumors have circulated for months that negotiators were debating including a cap as a way to help offset the revenue loss from a reduction in business tax rates that Republicans have put at the center of their plan. Reducing contribution limits would be, in effect, an accounting maneuver that would create space for tax cuts by collecting tax revenue now instead of in the future.

more
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/20/us/politics/republicans-tax-401-k.html?emc=edit_th_20171021&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=57435284&_r=0

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

bluecollar2

(3,622 posts)
3. makes sense
Sat Oct 21, 2017, 10:13 AM
Oct 2017

Since the middle class are getting a tax cut they'll have more money to save so they won't need retirement savings accounts.














Is the sarcasm thingy really necessary?

Demsrule86

(68,565 posts)
14. Which is bullshit. It replaces the pension so now they take that too...I fucking hate Republicans
Sat Oct 21, 2017, 12:07 PM
Oct 2017

and fuck anyone who helped in any elect these monsters. Everything the middle class has is going to be gone...poor and middle class voters will pay more so succubus creatures like Trump and Romney can pay nothing.

Voltaire2

(13,033 posts)
15. They are looking for ways to pay for the gigantic top level cuts
Sat Oct 21, 2017, 12:10 PM
Oct 2017

So a theory that nobody exceeds 2500 is nonsense.

roamer65

(36,745 posts)
5. The resulting pullback of 401k contributions will tank the stock market.
Sat Oct 21, 2017, 10:18 AM
Oct 2017

They are playing around with the next Great Depression on this one.

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
9. Bingo! This is true.
Sat Oct 21, 2017, 11:12 AM
Oct 2017

And of course, it is possible that if they privatize what is left of our SSI, they'll save the market for the 1%.

Aristus

(66,351 posts)
6. Whatever happened to the time-honored Republican axiom:
Sat Oct 21, 2017, 10:21 AM
Oct 2017

"It's your money; you should be able to do what you want to with it" - ?

DK504

(3,847 posts)
10. They want tent villagers and Hoovervilles
Sat Oct 21, 2017, 11:12 AM
Oct 2017

all over the country to control the masses. The sad part is most people in this country have no clue what Hooverville's were.

Yupster

(14,308 posts)
11. never happen
Sat Oct 21, 2017, 11:21 AM
Oct 2017

Can't think of anyone who would support this.

Maybe someone arguing only the top people can afford it so it's a tax cut for the rich?


I can't see Republicans going for it. They'd get murdered by their supporters.
















b

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Republicans Consider Shar...