General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHillary Clinton unaware of dossier before it was published
Clinton was disappointed that the research from the document was not made public before she lost the 2016 election, the source said.
The New York Times first reported on Wednesday that Clinton didn't know about the dossier until it was published, citing two associates who discussed the matter with her.
. . .
Clinton is not the only high-profile Democrat to deny knowledge of the document before it was published.
The Clinton campaign's national press secretary, Brian Fallon, tweeted Tuesday about the reported tie between the campaign and the dossier.
"I regret I didn't know about Christopher Steele's hiring pre-election," he tweeted, referring to the former British intelligence agent who authored the dossier. "If I had, I would have volunteered to go to Europe and try to help him."
"If I'd gotten his dossier before Nov 8, I may have tried to convince Mook & Podesta to let me hold a Comey-style press conference to read it," Fallon, who is now a CNN political contributor, tweeted.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/26/politics/hillary-clinton-dossier-buzzfeed/index.html
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,123 posts)The American electorate had a right to know everything about this creep!!
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,123 posts)NewJeffCT
(56,829 posts)he would slam it as partisan politics and not a real issue. With the RW control of the media, it would have drowned out whatever Clinton or (more likely) her surrogates said on the issue.
B2G
(9,766 posts)InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,123 posts)Mediumsizedhand
(531 posts)stating she was being too negative to Trump and not talking about the issues.
One of those, can't win either way, right?
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,123 posts)Never heard that... besides, can always be critically negative about your opponent AND positive on the issues. Like walking and chewing gum at the same time.
Mediumsizedhand
(531 posts)Number one. All the shit, and that was absolutely the reason Clinton lost.
And yes. Clinton figured the same, hence the way she ran her campaign and a point many of us made.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,123 posts)B2G
(9,766 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,123 posts)Hope whomeva that is never lands another campaign gig.
B2G
(9,766 posts)And she won't.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,123 posts)Iliyah
(25,111 posts)documents showing how bigly nasty and ugly t-rump was and that it needed to be exposed. They were talking about the Steel Dossier.
Not Ruth
(3,613 posts)sagesnow
(2,824 posts)HRC funded the Russian Dossier last Tuesday?
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10141896850
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)You're confusing funding research that led to a conclusion with the conclusion itself.
uponit7771
(90,364 posts)triron
(22,023 posts)sagesnow
(2,824 posts)money to pay Fusion GPS for the Russian Dossier?
Azathoth
(4,611 posts)All the money that was funneled to the lawyer by both the campaign and the DNC was reported as being for "legal services," so it's impossible to tell which funds were specifically to retain Fusion GPS.
Response to Azathoth (Reply #22)
Not Ruth This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to CousinIT (Original post)
Post removed
Response to Post removed (Reply #21)
B2G This message was self-deleted by its author.