Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CousinIT

(9,259 posts)
Thu Oct 26, 2017, 09:31 AM Oct 2017

Hillary Clinton unaware of dossier before it was published

Washington (CNN)Hillary Clinton was unaware of the now-infamous dossier of allegations about Donald Trump and Russia prior to Buzzfeed's publishing of the document earlier this year, a source familiar with the matter has told CNN.

Clinton was disappointed that the research from the document was not made public before she lost the 2016 election, the source said.

The New York Times first reported on Wednesday that Clinton didn't know about the dossier until it was published, citing two associates who discussed the matter with her.

. . .

Clinton is not the only high-profile Democrat to deny knowledge of the document before it was published.

The Clinton campaign's national press secretary, Brian Fallon, tweeted Tuesday about the reported tie between the campaign and the dossier.

"I regret I didn't know about Christopher Steele's hiring pre-election," he tweeted, referring to the former British intelligence agent who authored the dossier. "If I had, I would have volunteered to go to Europe and try to help him."

"If I'd gotten his dossier before Nov 8, I may have tried to convince Mook & Podesta to let me hold a Comey-style press conference to read it," Fallon, who is now a CNN political contributor, tweeted.


http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/26/politics/hillary-clinton-dossier-buzzfeed/index.html
26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton unaware of dossier before it was published (Original Post) CousinIT Oct 2017 OP
So, why DIDN'T they make this shit public before the Nazi-in-Chief stole the election? InAbLuEsTaTe Oct 2017 #1
Mitch McConnell leftofcool Oct 2017 #3
What about him? InAbLuEsTaTe Oct 2017 #4
He said that if Democrats brought up anything about Trump and Russia NewJeffCT Oct 2017 #17
They thought she was going to win. nt B2G Oct 2017 #6
Hope we neva again make mistake of not usin ALL available oppo research &take ANY election 4 granted InAbLuEsTaTe Oct 2017 #12
Are you kidding? When she went after him a little she was torn apart by a faction of Dems Mediumsizedhand Oct 2017 #15
YOU must be kiddin... too negative on tRump? How's that even remotely possible? InAbLuEsTaTe Oct 2017 #16
You didn't hear that? It was the number one reason she lost the election by a faction of our Party. Mediumsizedhand Oct 2017 #18
Didn't hear that... agree with your point. InAbLuEsTaTe Oct 2017 #25
I don't remember it like that at all. nt B2G Oct 2017 #19
If HIllary had known about the dossier, she would have used it. leftofcool Oct 2017 #2
Would hope so... so who's the idiot responsible for not informing Hillary? InAbLuEsTaTe Oct 2017 #14
My money is on DSW. B2G Oct 2017 #20
Haha, no... and good thing too!! InAbLuEsTaTe Oct 2017 #24
Remember right before Nov 2016, anti-trump gopers were tweeting about Iliyah Oct 2017 #5
Did anybody know? Not Ruth Oct 2017 #7
Then why did the Post report that sagesnow Oct 2017 #8
You're confusing funding research that led to a conclusion with the conclusion itself. LanternWaste Oct 2017 #9
WAPO reporter also showed no proof of the "lie" that was told to her uponit7771 Oct 2017 #11
Yet the media treats it as gospel. wtf? triron Oct 2017 #13
Who in the DNC authorized the sagesnow Oct 2017 #10
The money was paid by Clinton's campaign lawyer Azathoth Oct 2017 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author Not Ruth Oct 2017 #26
Post removed Post removed Oct 2017 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author B2G Oct 2017 #23

InAbLuEsTaTe

(24,123 posts)
1. So, why DIDN'T they make this shit public before the Nazi-in-Chief stole the election?
Thu Oct 26, 2017, 09:35 AM
Oct 2017

The American electorate had a right to know everything about this creep!!

NewJeffCT

(56,829 posts)
17. He said that if Democrats brought up anything about Trump and Russia
Thu Oct 26, 2017, 12:56 PM
Oct 2017

he would slam it as partisan politics and not a real issue. With the RW control of the media, it would have drowned out whatever Clinton or (more likely) her surrogates said on the issue.

InAbLuEsTaTe

(24,123 posts)
12. Hope we neva again make mistake of not usin ALL available oppo research &take ANY election 4 granted
Thu Oct 26, 2017, 12:24 PM
Oct 2017
 

Mediumsizedhand

(531 posts)
15. Are you kidding? When she went after him a little she was torn apart by a faction of Dems
Thu Oct 26, 2017, 12:31 PM
Oct 2017

stating she was being too negative to Trump and not talking about the issues.

One of those, can't win either way, right?

InAbLuEsTaTe

(24,123 posts)
16. YOU must be kiddin... too negative on tRump? How's that even remotely possible?
Thu Oct 26, 2017, 12:52 PM
Oct 2017

Never heard that... besides, can always be critically negative about your opponent AND positive on the issues. Like walking and chewing gum at the same time.

 

Mediumsizedhand

(531 posts)
18. You didn't hear that? It was the number one reason she lost the election by a faction of our Party.
Thu Oct 26, 2017, 01:00 PM
Oct 2017

Number one. All the shit, and that was absolutely the reason Clinton lost.

And yes. Clinton figured the same, hence the way she ran her campaign and a point many of us made.

InAbLuEsTaTe

(24,123 posts)
14. Would hope so... so who's the idiot responsible for not informing Hillary?
Thu Oct 26, 2017, 12:29 PM
Oct 2017

Hope whomeva that is never lands another campaign gig.

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
5. Remember right before Nov 2016, anti-trump gopers were tweeting about
Thu Oct 26, 2017, 09:44 AM
Oct 2017

documents showing how bigly nasty and ugly t-rump was and that it needed to be exposed. They were talking about the Steel Dossier.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
9. You're confusing funding research that led to a conclusion with the conclusion itself.
Thu Oct 26, 2017, 09:54 AM
Oct 2017

You're confusing funding research that led to a conclusion with the conclusion itself.

Azathoth

(4,611 posts)
22. The money was paid by Clinton's campaign lawyer
Thu Oct 26, 2017, 01:11 PM
Oct 2017

All the money that was funneled to the lawyer by both the campaign and the DNC was reported as being for "legal services," so it's impossible to tell which funds were specifically to retain Fusion GPS.

Response to Azathoth (Reply #22)

Response to CousinIT (Original post)

Response to Post removed (Reply #21)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hillary Clinton unaware o...