General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsToday on du I learned that it's OK for elderly man to grab women's asses
What the actual fuck?
HipChick
(25,485 posts)elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)Me too. What idiocy.
Merlot
(9,696 posts)elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)Taking them at their word. For all I know they're really Putin lol.
BainsBane
(53,031 posts)patriarchy and inequality depends on their collaboration. We've seen it with Julian Assange, Woody Allen, and countless rapists. Some of the most notorious misogynists left for JPR, where their misogyny goes unchallenged. I recall receiving one lecture after another in which they proclaimed any issue concerning women as less than "real." Only when attacks on reproductive rights were made, they didn't give a shit about that either.
One of the most disgusting comments I read said that Woody Allen was more oppressed by his daughter's allegations that she ever was, EVEN IF he molested her. That defense of child rape is one of the evilest things I have ever seen.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)were it THEIR daughters, granddaughters, or wives being
assaulted....In fact, I would bet good money on it.
HipChick
(25,485 posts)not the boardroom, by a male..
I asked him how he would feel, if someone said that to his wife
He said, his wife would have known her place, and not be in that situation..
whathehell
(29,067 posts)or he just told you that to avoid being "gotched".
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Hopefully, we'll receive a full list from these half-wits of the relevant medical conditions and age specifications that allow us to better tolerate sexual assault as merely cute and adorable.
Siwsan
(26,260 posts)This has been going on for longer than his health decline. I held the opinion that he might be going though some age related cognitive/impulse control issues, but now I'm thinking it is just shameful, inappropriate behavior. I'm realizing it has nothing to do with that. He is just an inappropriate jerk. He might think it's a joke. It most definitely is not.
He's 93, now, and either he has apologized, or someone apologized for him. But, damn.
brush
(53,771 posts)The version I heard was that she was black (that's in line with the Condelessa Rice Freudian slip of referring to W as her husband).
That story was squashed just as the W Bush awol story was so it's highly likely that stories of the younger HW the sexual abuser were also made to disappear.
tblue37
(65,340 posts)together (during the 1992 campaign), he said, "Pu**y." I think Daddy Bush has always had a porcine streak to his character .
malaise
(268,966 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)as stated by writer Katha Pollitt.
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)but no cigar.
SFnomad
(3,473 posts)that way I'll have something to look forward to and know when it's ok.
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)SFnomad
(3,473 posts)On edit: The part about "missing out" was sarcasm, for the sarcasm detection impaired.
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)Sorry if that comes as a disappointment.
SFnomad
(3,473 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)SFnomad
(3,473 posts)for the sarcasm detection impaired.
You don't have take losing well, do you?
SFnomad
(3,473 posts)in this thread that you have to have the last word and don't take losing well.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)SFnomad
(3,473 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)SFnomad
(3,473 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)SFnomad
(3,473 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)at the moment, I'm more interested in eating my dinner than in continuing a pissing contest...Bye now.
SFnomad
(3,473 posts)and you'll reply to this and prove it some more.
elias7
(3,997 posts)It's ok, happens to everyone. No need to dig the heels in, unless you want the post count...
whathehell
(29,067 posts)and I'm free to disagree.
treestar
(82,383 posts)is usually the sarcasm-impaired. Especially on DU. Who would think a DUer was serious in that post?
whathehell
(29,067 posts)The only "impairment" here is coming from someone who can't admit that communication isn't his strong point. Have a nice day.
treestar
(82,383 posts)not being his strong point? Use of sarcasm is part of communication.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)No one disputes the fact that sarcasm is a part of communication, but, like grammar, which is also misused in post # 22, it has to be used well to be effective.
SFnomad
(3,473 posts)and you'll notice the sarcasm-impaired poster has to get the last word in, in every reply to them ... just like I've stated. They've done it several more times in this thread since yesterday.
Response to SFnomad (Reply #19)
elehhhhna This message was self-deleted by its author.
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,425 posts)IANAL. Pay the $2.
The standard common law test of criminal liability is expressed in the Latin phrase actus reus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea, i.e. "the act is not culpable unless the mind is guilty". In jurisdictions with due process, there must be both actus reus ("guilty act" ) and mens rea for a defendant to be guilty of a crime (see concurrence). As a general rule, someone who acted without mental fault is not liable in criminal law. Exceptions are known as strict liability crimes.
In civil law, it is usually not necessary to prove a subjective mental element to establish liability for breach of contract or tort, for example. But if a tort is intentionally committed or a contract is intentionally breached, such intent may increase the scope of liability and the damages payable to the plaintiff.
In some jurisdictions, the terms mens rea and actus reus have been replaced by alternative terminology. In Australia, mens rea is now called "fault elements" or "mental elements" and actus reus is now called "physical elements" or "external elements". The point of the changes was to replace Latin with plain English.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)Last edited Thu Oct 26, 2017, 06:19 PM - Edit history (1)
actually molested a young actress at the WH who was there about an historic movie....I really didn't even believe this one until he apologized...
His grandchildren must be so proud.
.
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)It feels like they jumped to acknowledge this so quickly in order to cut off/ defuse the onslaught of further accusations.
MrsCoffee
(5,801 posts)That's how it came off anyway.
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)I wonder if he also employed some of his physical comedy by joking with anyone's boobs.
Not Ruth
(3,613 posts)WhiskeyGrinder
(22,329 posts)learning new mores and customs. It's amazing and quite sad and we really must be understanding when it comes to these men. Who could possibly expect them to act like decent people? They are from ANOTHER TIME.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)Dave Starsky
(5,914 posts)It is a reason for their behavior, but it's not an excuse.
Thankfully, these men are dying out. I am hoping that the new generations of men feel and act differently.
Merlot
(9,696 posts)To hope that this behavior dies out with these men isn't realistic. Nor should we have to wait for people to die before the world gets better.
Even if all these old guys die out, there are many (especially from other cultures) that will take up the slack.
Dave Starsky
(5,914 posts)There are a lot of "good men" in this world who don't accept the status quo. We are husbands, fathers, brothers, sons, and uncles to women that we love and care about deeply. We know that we are ALL in this together. We protect those we love, and we all help each other.
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)Are we referring to the Neolithic. Or what?
The_Casual_Observer
(27,742 posts)touched a woman like that, or ever even made a remark. None of the men I knew from those days would have done so either.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)The rest is just lame bullshit.
bobbieinok
(12,858 posts)Brains are such they're unable to adapt, change, learn when conditions change.
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)it's a bullshit excuse
Solly Mack
(90,763 posts)nolabear
(41,960 posts)It makes nothing okay at all for the victim but its a reason as opposed to an excuse. Elderly men can literally lose the ability to make the cognitive connection between thought, intent, act and consequence. As appalling as it is for the victim being angry at the person as a way to shame or get them to change is pointless. They might well have no memory of it.
Bush, now, might have loosened abilities but he committed a calculated act repeatedly and it was allowed and condoned by others. The whole thing stinks.
Docreed2003
(16,858 posts)When he assaulted these women.
He asked You know who my favorite magician is?? David Cop-a-feel as he grabbed this womans ass.
Theres no excuse in the world that can make that ok!
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)especially Rich Male privilege perhaps.
hlthe2b
(102,236 posts)and concomitant loss of inhibitions? If so, that is a REAL phenomenon--much to the anguish of many a family member.
If you aren't referring to that, then I agree, wtf?
With respect to GHWBush, I don't think that advanced dementia is at play AT ALL and he deserves all the backlash he is experiencing and MORE.
SFnomad
(3,473 posts)That's for sure.
Tanuki
(14,918 posts)elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)They have a responsibility to attempt to prevent it . If he cannot handle being out in public then they should not torture him by wheeling him out . It's sad, but this happens to people in their 90s sometimes.
Tanuki
(14,918 posts)is manifesting sexually disinhibited behavior as a symptom of dementia, his caregivers (including Dragon Barb) should not place him or unsuspecting members of the public in that position. People who work with the cognitively impaired (elderly and otherwise) take this sort of thing in stride, but the Bushes have not been especiaily forthcoming about Poppy's status and a fan who stepped close for a photo op had no context for what happened.
MuseRider
(34,107 posts)Ewwwww. I have been away most of the day. That is disgusting. It was obviously intentional or he would not have told them that particular joke. This is OK with some people? We will never be equal will we? *sigh*
NGU!
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)elias7
(3,997 posts)RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)Its also not okay for the senile to become violent, or foul mouthed in public or abusive to family members caring for them.
But it happens and the answer is not name calling or jail time or whatever other punishment proposed.
SFnomad
(3,473 posts)I was looking forward to becoming a socially unacceptable degenerate in my old age (aka dirty old man) ... and getting a pass for it.
(For the sarcasm-impaired, that was sarcasm)
RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)At 1:37
[link:http://
SFnomad
(3,473 posts)WhiteTara
(29,704 posts)but it is a crime, none the less.