General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJoy Reid says Trump voters really dont care about the economy: They just want him to crush us
MSNBCs Joy Reid told XM Radios Dean Obeidallah on Saturday that Trumpism is a danger to Americas children and that his voters are running on resentment, not on economic anxiety.
Trumpism is actually a thing its making children more coarse and cruel to each other, Reid said. Itss allowing kids to use racist slurs against each other in his name and use sexist slurs in his name.
She continued, His supporters dont care that he is vulgar- they are actually glad that he is vulgar and crude.
Nor do they care about the economy or cuts to their 401K, she said. They just want him to crush us.
https://www.rawstory.com/2017/10/joy-reid-says-trump-voters-really-dont-care-about-the-economy-they-just-want-him-to-crush-us/
Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)burnbaby
(685 posts)Can you be more specific
Kolesar
(31,182 posts)That is Trump's tax plan. You lose over three thousand in deductions or deferrals at least.
I have 401k funds whose earnings have not been taxed in twenty years. When I do use them, my tax rate will be 0 or 15%. This has allowed my earnings to compound.
So, the govt will have more revenue now. Trump will give up revenue by giving himself and other billionaires huge tax cuts.
Lucky Luciano
(11,254 posts)IronLionZion
(45,433 posts)To make up revenue for the enormous business tax cuts and lower rates for the wealthy, they plan to reduce 401K contributions so they can get that revenue from taxing the middle class.
It's very transparent, simple, shameless, and very regressive. It's amazing how many middle class Trumpsters actually believe they're getting a tax break. The lower income Trumpsters don't contribute to 401K anyway so they don't care.
Kolesar
(31,182 posts)"Republicans are reportedly considering capping annual 401(k) contributions at $2,400 on a pre-tax basis, much lower than the current maximum contribution of $18,000 for 2017..."
http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-tax-plan-401k-retirement-2017-10
I was thinking of IRAs and Roth IRAs that have a limit of $6300/year or so.
maxrandb
(15,324 posts)Dow at 7000 when he took office, close to 20000 when he left.
I'm guessing 85% of your 401k growth can be the "fault" of President Obama
Next time he drops over I will
Yavin4
(35,438 posts)almost ten years.
Lucky Luciano
(11,254 posts)You know who didn't help? (I know you know)
The fucking worthless thugs in congress blocking the recovery to try to blame dems if it failed.
Bernanke pleaded with congress to help with tge recovery, but the Fed had to do it all with monetary stimulus since congress was dead set against fiscal stimulus.
Yavin4
(35,438 posts)The economy need a bigger fiscal boost. However, when the economy slumps, the natural inclination of government is austerity instead of stimulus. Austerity is the biggest reason for Brexit.
RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)We are still seeing the residual good work and steady guidance of President Obama.
Hopefully, if the Trump administration remains completely incompetent at advancing their economy killing polices we might sustain this until next fall. Maybe.
delisen
(6,043 posts)Kolesar
(31,182 posts)Last edited Mon Oct 30, 2017, 10:26 AM - Edit history (1)
Been through many rural areas in PA and it's filed with angry, poor, less educated people who think those upity bohemian city dwellers are getting free handouts (from their tax money). They fail to see that Trump promising to give them great jobs with stupendous benefits is any more of a hand out than what they think others are getting. Never mind most of the Trumpites couldn't pass a background check or drug tests to land some crap-ass retail job if their life depended on it.
While I'm at it, why do these same people criticize poor people with expensive cell phones but never say anything about rural poor who have gun collections worth thousands of $?!?
+1
dottie66
(59 posts)by liberals. I doubt we're the reason their lives are sad.
coolsandy
(479 posts)barbtries
(28,789 posts)not to realize that they will be in the crusher too.
RKP5637
(67,107 posts)barbtries
(28,789 posts)for a long time. this fact should be in the news. the fact of his dangerous mental illness should be on the news. it's so distressing that day in and day out this all is on display for anyone with eyes to see and it doesn't get reported on.
GeoWilliam750
(2,522 posts)In the last century alone, hundreds upon hundreds of millions of people have died in quarrels between their "betters" whom they never even ever met.
For millennia, people have happily died for no real hope of any benefit.
barbtries
(28,789 posts)it's so true. i'm a little pollyanna and keep thinking we should be better by now.
dalton99a
(81,475 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)I've run across that sentiment.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)dalton99a
(81,475 posts)Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)It's not about issues at all. It's about revenge. The only thing Donnie could do to piss off his base is do something that we agree with, Obama supports and endorses, or something Hillary supports and endorses.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=8759511
As long as he keeps doing things to piss us off..
He'll be able to do no wrong in their eyes.
You use rational argument. That will not work here. If it did, he'd have NEVER been elected.
There is ONLY one thing that would get his brownshirts to turn on him.. Them thinking that we love and support him, or at the very least no longer hate him.
This whole Rump thing isn't about them putting in someone they actually think will "make America great again". Not a damn thing to do with it. The more the media pointed out his flaws, the more us "snowflakes" spoke out against him, the more they supported him.
It has absolutely nothing to do with #45, it's all about revenge on the left for having "forced Obama" onto them for 8 years, and now it's time for revenge.
I see evidence of this every single day on social media, and in the comments sections of news articles. Almost nobody defends anything #45 does, it's always "well Obama did", or "well Hillary did", or "suck it up snowflake", or "go crawl back to your safe place"..
The ONLY real appeal Trump has to them is that his actions piss us off. They don't stop for one fucking second to realize that the same shit we're pissed off about screws them over as well. That doesn't matter, as long as it pisses us "pansy liberals" off.
Cosmocat
(14,564 posts)to us ...
They have effectively been brainwashed so well that they have no concern for their own best interests, much less the best interests of the country at large.
They know one thing and one thing only - liberals suck bigly.
That is all the republican party knows now, it is all they stand for, honestly, outside of fellatiating their masters.
Screw the liberals.
vlyons
(10,252 posts)In Buddhism, we say that hatred makes you stupid. Hatred is a form of ignorance and delusion. The GOP and Fox News has long used hate-mongering and fear-mongering to achieve political advantage. Dividing Americans into "us" and "not us." That so m any Americans fall for this and have such extreme ill will in their hearts depresses me, because there is not much that we can do to them. They take delight is seeings others hurt and suffer. Truly Trumpsters are neo-nazis and don't even recognize it.
The only thing true about Trumpsters is their hatred for gov. But our gov has been deeply and widely corrupted with corporate lobbying money. But Trumpsters are so deluded that they care not just how much Trump has given over the gov to even more far reaching corporate greedy monied interests.
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)I've heard it from a few of them over the past year or two - They expect Trump to screw them over, since they've been getting screwed over by politicians their entire lives. However, as long as he screws the other guys over worse, they'll be okay with it.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)TalenaGor
(1,104 posts)I recently had a discussion on quora about this....bottom line result was...they truely don't care about anything but angering liberals.....we are the #1 enemy....
KPN
(15,643 posts)I appreciate, understand and frequently harbor her feelings about Trump supporters myself.
But reducing the entire phenomena of Trump's election and presidency to hate is overly simplistic. Discounting "economic anxiety" as a root cause is a mistake and will bode poorly for the Democratic Party if we do not recognize its role.
It is easy to discount economic anxiety on the basis of popular vote/electoral college, Comey, Russia collusion, white supremacists/racism/misogyny/xenophobia, voter suppression, etc., etc. Afterall, they entail either hatred, cheating or criminal activity/treason.
But what's to stop the GOP, its big money donors and candidates from doing whatever it takes to win once again -- Nixon, Reagan, GW, Trump. We need every vote we can get. Discounting any potential vote for the Democratic Party is a mistake. Discounting the reality of an economy that more and more serves the few at a cost to the many would be a huge mistake.
Joy's right about "they want to crush us" -- they do want to crush us. But only in so far as they are bigoted or just plain stupid (Fox/right-wing talking heads informed) Trump supporters, the GOP, or its big money donors. There are plenty of "they" in terms of people who voted for Trump who don't belong in those categories. Most of those are folks who fall in the "economic anxiety" or just plain sick of "business as usual", "what have you done for me lately? (not much)" Washington politics.
Discounting them would be stupid. Lets make sure we're clear about who "they" is.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)It's only the women and POC whose lives they want to ruin.
Fixed it for you.
KPN
(15,643 posts)You modified to meet your view of the world. They definitely want to crush women and POC, but also liberals/progressives generally -- and that's basically driven by greed or propaganda depending on who "they" are.
You have you view and opinion. I have mine. Hillary may have won that segment, but not enough of them to overcome everything else. There were plenty we should have won -- but didn't because we haven't passed the "what have you done for me lately" economic test. There is sufficient data to show this, and data to show that not all of these people are Trump supporters or will be in the future. I definitely think the Democratic Party needs to do a better job of inspiring the working class to vote for and support them. Lambasting bigots is not a fail-safe message for winning elections as we recently saw.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)KPN
(15,643 posts)There's been plenty of information including data about how different demographic groups voted by State, region and nationally posted right here at DU.
I don't have an issue with defending ourselves (our party) when it comes to comparisons with the GOP/other parties. But when I see and hear denial of facts that affect the overall success of our party, and broadly of middle and working class people economically, then I do.
I made an observation that I genuinely and in good faith believe is right -- that many, including some very influential personas within our party have or turn a blind eye to -- and I get hit with a snide remark like "I fixed it for you" followed by gamesmanship.
Sorry for intruding on people's happy space, but this stuff is important to our party and our nation in my view and I'm therefore sometimes going to take opportunities that present themselves to present my good faith perspective.
]I'll let you have the last word here.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,907 posts)Progressive dog
(6,900 posts)She should be rewarded by viewership from those who agree with her.
TNLib
(1,819 posts)It's a mental disorder!!
Tom Rinaldo
(22,912 posts)Yes I think Joy has her finger on a pulse here. The sentiments she describes does run through Trump voter circles, but not uniformly, and not in all cases. Just most.
Why does that matter? Because politics in America swings based on shifts in the votes of relatively small percentages of voters. There has always been a "No Nothing" bloc in American politics, but that bloc preexists Trump literally by centuries. And sure that bloc ebbs and flows somewhat based on changing circumstances over the years. But it rarely if ever is big enough to provide national electoral majorities to a Presidential candidate by itself unless their votes are joined by other, often smaller groups of voters, who ultimately back the same candidate, but for a different set of reasons or priorities.
There will always be haters, just like there will always be people who think Africa is a country not a continent and others who think that men landing on the moon was faked inside a studio. They are out there, and Trump owns most of them, and probably most of those who support Trump have "membership" in those groups.
That is not the point. They have always been beyond our reach - no one is urging reaching out to them. It's the 20 to 30% of Trump voters who don't fall into that profile who ultimately can make or break a candidate like Trump moving forward. And, yes, some of THEM are moved by "economic anxiety".