Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SoCalMusicLover

(3,194 posts)
Mon Oct 30, 2017, 07:50 PM Oct 2017

If Tea Leaves Are Showing Trouble Ahead, Why Doesn't Drumpf Fire Mueller Now?

DU seems to think this is the beginning of the end for Drumpf and those around him. Lots of people also believe that Drumpf will get someone to fire Mueller to end his investigation.

What possible reason would Drumpf have for waiting on bringing the axe down on Mueller? If there is only more bad news to come, and Drumpf would I assume has been told this by his attorneys, why not take the hit now for having Mueller fired, since he's going to take it eventually anyways, and his standing could suffer more between now and then.

29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If Tea Leaves Are Showing Trouble Ahead, Why Doesn't Drumpf Fire Mueller Now? (Original Post) SoCalMusicLover Oct 2017 OP
Rosenstein wont fire Mueller nmgaucho Oct 2017 #1
What About Nixon? SoCalMusicLover Oct 2017 #5
Even if he fires Mueller, the evidence doesn't go away C_U_L8R Oct 2017 #2
So You Don't Think He'll Have Mueller Fired? nt SoCalMusicLover Oct 2017 #3
I got no idea... but C_U_L8R Oct 2017 #7
Well, it would not necessarily stop it.... SoCalMusicLover Oct 2017 #10
The evidence will explode in all directions. lagomorph777 Oct 2017 #28
Republicans don't read tea leaves. They read Pee Leaves. Achilleaze Oct 2017 #4
That's what the jeff sessions thing was about JI7 Oct 2017 #6
Did GOP Tell Him That If Mueller Is Fired, Impeachment Is On Table? nt SoCalMusicLover Oct 2017 #8
I think that while he's angry Bettie Oct 2017 #9
Isn't That What His Attorneys Are Supposed To Tell Him? SoCalMusicLover Oct 2017 #11
Probably not worth the effort marylandblue Oct 2017 #13
He is notorious for NOT listening to his attorneys Maeve Oct 2017 #15
Again, he's probably been told before that he was in big trouble Bettie Oct 2017 #22
I am sure whenever he asks for advice on it, they say don't do it marylandblue Oct 2017 #12
He wants other people to stop Mueller for him, which is what yesterday's "DO SOMETHING!" was about. highplainsdem Oct 2017 #14
Trump can't fire Mueller. Only the AG can fire him. Kablooie Oct 2017 #16
And Mueller himself, a civil servant, can only be fired for cause. Not on a whim. Kaleva Oct 2017 #17
That's right. The new Deputy would have to invent a reason to fire Mueller. Kablooie Oct 2017 #19
And it'd have to be a reason that stands up to scrutiny. From the media and Congress. Kaleva Oct 2017 #20
He has to stay in until he can process pardons for everyone. grantcart Oct 2017 #18
The R meme is that Mueller is going to take down Bill Clinton and HRC Arazi Oct 2017 #21
The R's in Congress and on Fox know better, but they're desperately wanting to alter the narrative. Garrett78 Oct 2017 #24
I Hope You're All Correct SoCalMusicLover Oct 2017 #23
He will probably have a meeting with Rod Rosenstein tomorrow? kentuck Oct 2017 #25
To fire Mueller at this juncture ... NanceGreggs Oct 2017 #26
If I know Trump Corgigal Oct 2017 #27
Trump is not going to fire Mueller or have Asst DA fire Kathy M Oct 2017 #29
 

SoCalMusicLover

(3,194 posts)
5. What About Nixon?
Mon Oct 30, 2017, 07:57 PM
Oct 2017

Rosenstein could get fired, and his replacement would do the dirty work. I thought that was the most likely scenario that's been discussed.

C_U_L8R

(45,002 posts)
2. Even if he fires Mueller, the evidence doesn't go away
Mon Oct 30, 2017, 07:53 PM
Oct 2017

Trump is going down one way or another.
If not in by Mueller, then by NY State
or the next Dem congress.

C_U_L8R

(45,002 posts)
7. I got no idea... but
Mon Oct 30, 2017, 07:58 PM
Oct 2017

If Trump is a stupid as I suspect, then he probably will fire Mueller.
I just don't think that dumb move will stop justice, even if it takes longer.

 

SoCalMusicLover

(3,194 posts)
10. Well, it would not necessarily stop it....
Mon Oct 30, 2017, 08:02 PM
Oct 2017

But it seems like Drumpf would like to delay the inevitable for as long as possible, and firing Mueller would be at least somewhat of a setback. Not to mention Mueller might be too aggressive and it would be a benefit not having him specifically in charge of an investigation.

Maybe he is waiting until a point of no return, when he's 100% certain things are collapsing all around him, and firing Mueller is the least of his worries.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
28. The evidence will explode in all directions.
Tue Oct 31, 2017, 12:23 AM
Oct 2017

You can be sure that Mueller has laid a complex legal and digital minefield. RePutins all over town will be destroyed.

Bettie

(16,105 posts)
9. I think that while he's angry
Mon Oct 30, 2017, 08:00 PM
Oct 2017

he truly doesn't understand that there might be consequences for HIM.

He's been involved in unethical and illegal activity all of his adult life and he's never had to do more than pay some money.

Add that to his enormous ego and lack of awareness of anything outside of himself and he figures maybe someone will go to jail, but it won't be him so that's OK.

 

SoCalMusicLover

(3,194 posts)
11. Isn't That What His Attorneys Are Supposed To Tell Him?
Mon Oct 30, 2017, 08:03 PM
Oct 2017

I realize they're probably out to make as much off Drumpf as they can, but if he is in deep trouble, shouldn't they convince him of that?

Maeve

(42,282 posts)
15. He is notorious for NOT listening to his attorneys
Mon Oct 30, 2017, 08:08 PM
Oct 2017

He' so sure he's the smartest one in the room...until he's proven not to be.

Bettie

(16,105 posts)
22. Again, he's probably been told before that he was in big trouble
Mon Oct 30, 2017, 08:51 PM
Oct 2017

and then, meh, he pays a fine and goes on his merry way.

I truly believe that he thinks he can not be touched. By anyone.

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
12. I am sure whenever he asks for advice on it, they say don't do it
Mon Oct 30, 2017, 08:03 PM
Oct 2017

He isn't decisive at all. He just does what people tell him, and literal nobody thinks it would be a good idea.

highplainsdem

(48,976 posts)
14. He wants other people to stop Mueller for him, which is what yesterday's "DO SOMETHING!" was about.
Mon Oct 30, 2017, 08:08 PM
Oct 2017

RW media stories and posts have focused on two possible ways that could be done.

One is that Sessions could un-recuse himself and fire Mueller. That would put the onus on Sessions.

The other is the GOP Congress slashing Mueller's funding to cripple his investigation.

Both of those would be obstruction of justice. But with both, Trump could try to claim he wasn't the one responsible for the obstruction.

Kablooie

(18,634 posts)
16. Trump can't fire Mueller. Only the AG can fire him.
Mon Oct 30, 2017, 08:24 PM
Oct 2017

As I understand it:

Normally the AG, Sessions, could fire Mueller which is why Trump put him there.
But Sessions recused himself so his Deputy, Rosenstein is over Mueller and is the only person now who can fire him.

Trump can't fire Rosenstein either only Sessions can and Rosenstein can only be fired for cause, not on a whim.

So to fire Mueller Trump has to convince Sessions to invent a reason to fire Rosenstein and then find someone who will agree to fire Mueller and install him as Deputy AG. Mueller can then be fired.

Of course by doing this Sessions and the new Deputy have both publicly obstructed justice and if anyone other than Trump becomes president they will probably be indicted and go to jail.

So it will be pretty difficult for Trump to convince Sessions to to risk his career like this and who on earth would take the Deputy AG position knowing it would almost certainly be a straight railroad track right into prison?


Arazi

(6,829 posts)
21. The R meme is that Mueller is going to take down Bill Clinton and HRC
Mon Oct 30, 2017, 08:41 PM
Oct 2017

That Tony Podesta is now roped into Mueller's investigation signals to them that he's going to get into Clinton "crimes".

R's don't yet understand the severity of the problem. They're still operating under the delusion that the DOJ will "nail" the Clintons. Trump is only watching Faux. His advisors are shielding the inevitable from him and only providing the most promising spin.

Your error is assuming Trump/this WH admin digests bi-partisan reporting. He doesn't/they don't.

I relish the popping of this bubble

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
24. The R's in Congress and on Fox know better, but they're desperately wanting to alter the narrative.
Mon Oct 30, 2017, 11:31 PM
Oct 2017

They need their constituents to remain outraged (about Clinton/women, about the "librul witch hunt," etc.) and eager to vote Republican any chance they get.

 

SoCalMusicLover

(3,194 posts)
23. I Hope You're All Correct
Mon Oct 30, 2017, 11:17 PM
Oct 2017

It's just that the other side does not like to lose. They fight with every ounce they have to emerge victorious, even when they are doing so in the name of something illegal, unethical or immoral. There is no level they're not willing to stoop, and an arrogant POS like Drumpf is their leader.

I don't trust them one bit, and do not think they'll sit by willingly and watch this happen, even if it's inevitable. They certainly are not going to win the PR war with Hillary Clinton Spin with each succeeding indictment.

kentuck

(111,094 posts)
25. He will probably have a meeting with Rod Rosenstein tomorrow?
Mon Oct 30, 2017, 11:45 PM
Oct 2017

...since he met with Jeff Sessions today.

He is looking for someone to fire Mueller would be my guess. If Rosenstein steps down, we might surmise that to be the case?

If Mueller were to indict several more of the Gang, Trump would have to pardon all of them.

Otherwise, the trials would continue and justice would decide innocence or guilt.

Unless the Senate lets him know that he should not be so foolish as to attempt such a trick.

NanceGreggs

(27,814 posts)
26. To fire Mueller at this juncture ...
Tue Oct 31, 2017, 12:05 AM
Oct 2017

... would be widely perceived as an admission of guilt. Trump may not understand that, but the Republican PTB do.

The WH/GOP line has been "we're cooperating, we're handing over documents, we have nothing to hide" - a position that would be blown out of the water if Trump tried to fire Mueller (which he can't do directly, and the process of doing so would draw even MORE negative attention).

They've tried to explain away Trump's firing of Comey for months, claiming it had nothing to do with the Russia investigation. How could they possibly explain away Trump doing it a second time, just as the first indictments are announced?

Even a lot of dumbass Republican voters would be skeptical of lightening coincidentally striking the same place twice.

Corgigal

(9,291 posts)
27. If I know Trump
Tue Oct 31, 2017, 12:21 AM
Oct 2017

and being raised near NYC, I couldn't get away from this clown.

He will try to do it in anyway he can, he will see that he has no choice. Muller knows it to, which is why he has state DAs offices on standby.

Hope I'm wrong, but I can't see him behaving any other way.

Kathy M

(1,242 posts)
29. Trump is not going to fire Mueller or have Asst DA fire
Tue Oct 31, 2017, 12:23 AM
Oct 2017

Let this play out ..... i think it be good to clean up a little / a lot in Washington where ever it goes ........

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If Tea Leaves Are Showing...