General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"DONNA BRAZILE EXPLICITLY MADE FALSE AND GROSSLY IRRESPONSIBLE CHARGES"
Ok I really suck at doing 4 paragraph excerpts.
Article is a pretty thoughtful analysis of Braziles' mistakes and missteps in the book ending up in false charges. I enjoy this guy's blog, good writer.
Also pushes back on intellectually dishonest Brazile defenders like Glenn Greenwald.
Sorry about the uselessness of my except. Article is thorough but not to long to read .
http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2017/11/donna-brazile-explicitly-made-false-grossly-irresponsible-charges
DONNA BRAZILE EXPLICITLY MADE FALSE AND GROSSLY IRRESPONSIBLE CHARGES
BY SCOTT LEMIEUX / ON NOVEMBER 10, 2017 / AT 3:01 PM / IN GENERAL 1565 VIEWS
http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2017/11/donna-brazile-explicitly-made-false-grossly-irresponsible-charges
As Donna Brazile continues her tour of pandering to wingnuts and professional 2016 primary re-litigators, multiple people have claimed that shes being treated unfairly by critics who fall outside these categories, because she never said that the primaries were rigged.
This defense, however, completely fails. Not only was the reaction of people like Greenwald inevitable, it was an accurate reading of the Politico excerpt. I dont know what Brazile intended to argue, and having seen her performance from when she was on the Ineffective Democratic Talking Heads Circuit, its entirely possible that her assertion that the 2016 primary was rigged was the product of bad writing and foggy thinking. But it is what she asserted. Lets go to the text:
<snip, quotation from Politico excerpt>
Brazile clearly and unambiguously states that the DNC hacks provided credible evidence that the primaries were rigged. The DNC hacks, of course, show no such thing. The closest the hacks came to providing evidence that the primaries were rigged are some random DNC nobody suggesting a stupid smear of Sanders, being immediately brushed off, and nobody doing anything. Theres nothing there.
For Brazile to lend credence to the claims that the DNC leaks suggested that the primaries was rigged is disgusting in itself. And, in addition, it renders one defense of Brazile after saying that she had found proof that the primaries were rigged, she goes on to discuss a bunch of DNC-related stuff that isnt primary rigging entirely inoperative. Since theres not only no evidence that the primaries were rigged but nobody could explain the mechanism by which the DNC could rig the primaries even if it wanted to, by definition the evidence that the primaries were rigged consists of non-sequiturs. While its not evidence of primary rigging, the stuff Brazile goes on to discuss 1)is considered evidence of primary rigging by the idiots and hacks who assert that the primaries were rigged, and 2)Brazile explicitly says that she finds their arguments credible. So the fact that Braziles subsequent discussion is objectively not evidence of primary rigging is neither here not there absent language making it clear that Brazile doesnt consider it evidence of primary rigging, language which AFICT is absent in the text.
MUCH MORE AT LINK
Chasstev365
(5,191 posts)emulatorloo
(44,116 posts)shanny
(6,709 posts)to the DNC rules committee?
emulatorloo
(44,116 posts)I suck at excerpting articles, it is a short read but a well thought out analysis
shanny
(6,709 posts)Me.
(35,454 posts)She has no place on the DNC any longer
StevieM
(10,500 posts)It should have been an earth-shattering story that was all over the news. It demonstrates how selective Russian leaking affected the last election. And it contradicts the claim that HRC was being given unfair advantages over her opponents.
The media completely ignored it, of course.
R B Garr
(16,950 posts)cheating for Sanders. Conversely shes only telling the truth if she says the word rigged, but then she denies saying that now, so wtf.
Me.
(35,454 posts)R B Garr
(16,950 posts)was going on with Hillary, which matches what she said about replacing her on the ticket. Hmmm. Big money in ratfucking.
hedda_foil
(16,372 posts)This looks altogether too much like Russian poo.
emulatorloo
(44,116 posts)This author is a solid Democratic who is able to cut thru bullshit. Pushes back on Putin nonsense when it comes up.
This is an opinion piece, it is very well argued.
hedda_foil
(16,372 posts)This piece is inflammatory and is just as likely gauged to fling Dem to Dem poo as it is to be solid info. Brazile's book is out and anyone can check on what she really said in it.
R B Garr
(16,950 posts)recent talk show appearances.
She also says she helped Bernie.
emulatorloo
(44,116 posts)is not a Russian propagandist as you suggested.