General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOK, now I'm just mad as hell........an Army vet comes forward saying Al Franken cupped her breast.
An Army veteran says Sen. Al Franken groped her in December 2003, telling CNN that while she was deployed in Kuwait, the Minnesota Democrat cupped her breast during a photo op.
Stephanie Kemplin, 41, of Maineville, Ohio, is the fifth woman in two weeks to accuse Franken of inappropriate touching, and the second person to allege that such behavior took place while Franken was on a USO tour. Three of the five women have been identified by name.
Kemplin said while she was stationed in the Middle East during the Iraq War, she met Franken -- at the time, a comedian and writer -- as he was visiting American troops with the USO. A longtime fan of "Saturday Night Live," Kemplin got in line to take a photo with Franken.
"When he put his arm around me, he groped my right breast. He kept his hand all the way over on my breast," Kemplin said in an interview. "I've never had a man put their arm around me and then cup my breast. So he was holding my breast on the side."
http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/30/politics/al-franken-groping-allegation/index.html
LexVegas
(6,060 posts)spotthebird
(171 posts)This is nuts.
Is there any contemporaneous reporting? Does this witness have an obvious ulterior motive as the other named accusers do?
Demsrule86
(68,565 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)At what point do these revelations harm our party ?
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)MN has a Dem governor right now, correct?
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)to this latest allegation.
Kimchijeon
(1,606 posts)Unless he caves (they hope he will exhibit what is established typical spineless liberal behavior, apologizing when he's actually innocent, and essentially self destructing, and bowing down to their ridiculous demands - aka "compromise" lol)
Anyway I am sure he will have more guts than they bargained for and not fall for the cartoonish setup. If not then wow, people are even dumber than I thought, and welp we are well and truly fucked. Don't fall for this shit people, it's glaringly obvious bullshit. Use your critical thinking caps for fucks sake.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)rsong71
(38 posts)The allegations involve something we can't see, yet there are pictures that show nothing. Makes me think of how magicians do magic - leading the audience, telling them what they see and what they should expect to see while they do a slight of hand and make things appear or disappear.
Is that what this is? "Here's a picture - see the abuse that is going on? Don't you see it? "
No, I don't see it. Just because you say its there doesn't mean I can see it. But for some people who aren't playing close attention, they go right along with the trick. "Oh! I see it! yes, that's abuse!" But did they really see it?
Ugh! the potential for gas lighting here is concerning.
This needs to be investigated in a systematic matter. Take the allegations seriously, but then interview the accusers and the witnesses. To be accused of something does not mean it actual happened. I know. I spent 2 years investigation child abuse.
I'm afraid he is being caught up in this tsunami of change in our society. This tsunami is a good thing - everyone is becoming so much more aware of sexual harassment. But a knee-jerk reaction to Franken worries me. The republicans play dirty - it's too easy to set up and attack Franken or any other democratic and then watch democrats eat their own.
Demsrule86
(68,565 posts)I don't believe one word.
a kennedy
(29,658 posts)a big problem. Can't just explain these away. D*mn.
BeyondGeography
(39,374 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Stated that he has taken thousands of photos with people and this isnt how he operates. Said they are going to fully cooperate with the ethics investigation.
That line becomes a little difficult to swallow considering some of the photos out there. We are at a point where it will be almost impossible to elect someone with a similar profile again. The photos dont necessarily show any wrongdoing yet they paint an unflattering picture when consumed with some of the accusations.
BeyondGeography
(39,374 posts)Its not always better, but it is different. Permanently.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)LisaL
(44,973 posts)His hand is on her back and nowhere near her breast.
Perception is reality and there is no way around that. Real or not a trend has been established and unflattering photos are out there. I addressed the genuine aspect in my post.
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)spotthebird
(171 posts)some show Franken and the accuser might have been in the same frame, but that's it.
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)Tweeden.
a kennedy
(29,658 posts)octoberlib
(14,971 posts)a kennedy
(29,658 posts)Thanks, and do I feel stupid.
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)Shes also a Trump supporter.
rsong71
(38 posts)That way we can all see it. It would help as we process this new allegation. Get all of the facts out there.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)a kennedy
(29,658 posts)He's my Senator, and a good guy, gotta remember they're trying to get rid of him.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)And a bit more of me dies each time I hear about another woman who voted for Trump.
brush
(53,776 posts)What are we to make of these accusations, and the accusers' republicanism?
Do we just wait for more and more to come forward with USO or campaign trail posed photos that show nothing but are accompanied by accusations?
Out of all this alleged groping seems there would be at least one photo of a woman grimacing, or frowning or in shock from the unwanted touching but all we see are photos of the women smiling with Franken.
Is Al Franken being targeted?
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I also think you just presented a number of items that have nothing to do with the accuracy of the claims or not. That is a road we cannot go down. I promise almost all sexual harassment happens off camera. You can take that to the bank.
brush
(53,776 posts)Last edited Thu Nov 30, 2017, 03:27 PM - Edit history (1)
All the alleged Franken incidents happened in front of cameras.
Why didn't the cameras or photographers capture any signs of distress?
That's the question.
rsong71
(38 posts)In the worst way because it is too easy to befuddle us progressives who care about women's rights. This isn't a black and white issue. It needs to be investigated. But before that happens - Franken is getting crucified in the media. Damnit! now I sound like the freakin' defenders of Moore.
This is why this vile republican tactic is so effective. Seem like right out of Putin's playbook. get dems to turn on one another.
woodsprite
(11,914 posts)GoCubsGo
(32,083 posts)Funny how that works.
still_one
(92,190 posts)liberal feminists who want to be anonymous, where this only occurs in public places with large people, and a preference during photo OPs, with a spouse or significantly other watching.
Sure seems no one is out to get AL here.
Kirk Lover
(3,608 posts)lots of folks milling about with lots of onlookers. This makes NO SENSE!
still_one
(92,190 posts)except for the photo with Tweeden, I think he is saying that if it occurred it was unintentional.
Just looking at the photo in this OP, the way the person is angled against Franken, I could see how that is possible, though in the photo, there sure isn't any apparent inappropriate touching occurring.
Demsrule86
(68,565 posts)Last edited Thu Nov 30, 2017, 12:02 PM - Edit history (2)
part of a right wing plot to take down an effective Democrat. The women involved will be required to testify under oath and about who they talked to etc. They could be charged with perjury. I wonder how many of them will do this...and I wonder if some will simply retract their statements. Franken has taken thousands of pictures; clearly this is GOP Bullshit and those Dems that pile on are complicit and only help the GOP. None of the previous Hannity engineered bullshit worked, I doubt this will.
Kirk Lover
(3,608 posts)still_one
(92,190 posts)highmindedhavi
(355 posts)nt
Demsrule86
(68,565 posts)Demsrule86
(68,565 posts)lying, but he has said he doesn't remember it that way...kind of a polite way to say liar...Thanks for the heads up.
still_one
(92,190 posts)pointed out, people hopefully will be under oath.
He doesn't want this to be based on trail by media sensationalism like was done with the Swift Boating of John Kerry, the propagation of the falsehoods of President Obama, and the LIES about the Hillary emails.
Unfortunately, I don't think the republicans in Congress will do it
Demsrule86
(68,565 posts)I believe you are absolutely correct. Let there be an investigation. He has nothing to fear in my opinion. None of this will hold up under scrutiny.
Demsrule86
(68,565 posts)hold up in any hearing.
still_one
(92,190 posts)Demsrule86
(68,565 posts)side doing this...so maybe a little tit for tat would end their enthusiasm for this .
KPN
(15,645 posts)wryter2000
(46,043 posts)Not buying it
rsong71
(38 posts)pnwmom
(108,977 posts)rsong71
(38 posts)Chasstev365
(5,191 posts)mindfulNJ
(2,367 posts)we can deal with it AFTER the Tax Scam Bill. We need to focus on that today...the timing of this AND the Matt Lauer thing is extremely suspect to me.
Focus people, focus. Our democracy is at stake here.
Call your Senators !!!! (202) 224-3121
LAS14
(13,783 posts)InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)bdamomma
(63,849 posts)that bill is full of shit, and it is going to ruin peoples lives.
Dec 12th is another date to stop the elimination of Net Neutrality too.
rsong71
(38 posts)Fullduplexxx
(7,860 posts)bluestarone
(16,939 posts)1000%
Demsrule86
(68,565 posts)LenaBaby61
(6,974 posts)I haven't heard ONE peep out of Tweeden since Franken said let's have hearings/investigations into this whole thing.
Okay, you have these 2 other "anonymous" women stepping forward with their accusations.
And now another right-winger who has ties TO Tweeden, and who also voted for the pussy-grabber-in-chief?
Uh, something stinks to high heaven here. Franken ought to double-down and stay with the investigation route to see what's REALLY going on here.
alarimer
(16,245 posts)kacekwl
(7,017 posts)seeing the video of her grabbing the country singer's ass and rubbing her butt on him kissing others on stage I don't care anymore. Tweeten clearly has an agenda with ties to Fox etc. and her own show. This latest breast grab is nonsense any way you look at it.
stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)yardwork
(61,607 posts)angstlessk
(11,862 posts)she does NOT look 'embarrassed' to me...she was so upset she cuddled right up to Frankin...OH, and the photo does NOT show ANY 'groping'!!!
Two repugnican operatives, two 'anonymous accusers, and her...
She seems pretty desperate for some cash
Source: http://www.buzzfile.com/business/Stephanie-Kemplin-Cfe,-LLC-513-325-8756
AND it seems, Frankin ONLY gropes repugnicans who voted for trump?
LisaL
(44,973 posts)Would he have go under her arm or over her arm? Certainly she looks totally fine and smiling in the photo, without a hint that anything is off.
angstlessk
(11,862 posts)THEN in came the photographer?
Tipperary
(6,930 posts)She is a Trumper so I am not inclined to believe her suddenly piling on to this story.
JawJaw
(722 posts)Kemplin estimated that the touching lasted anywhere from five to 10 seconds. She said she eventually turned her body to shift Franken's hand off her breast before the picture was taken.
So, she's trying to tell us that she, a military police officer, let Franken grope her for 5-10 seconds and THEN moved in closer to him and smiled for the photo?
BULL-SHIT.
blue cat
(2,415 posts)After reading her account. Then I got mad because her story is so full of crap.
still_one
(92,190 posts)accusers, with all the photos showing them with broad smiles
Joe McCarthy would be so proud
This smells pure Rove
GoCubsGo
(32,083 posts)Eyeball_Kid
(7,432 posts)still_one
(92,190 posts)Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)If he is grabbing her breast on the photo, i will eat my crowd for dinner
LisaL
(44,973 posts)Both are smiling, his hand is on her back.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)But looks like his hand is on her back. Perhaps she has a genetic abnormality and her breasts grew on her dorsal side?
Bettie
(16,105 posts)maybe my fairly substantial breasts are in the wrong place or something, because his hands are no where near where my breasts would be!
RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)......before the pic was taken.
BULLSHIT!
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)Really bad. I am tired of this garbage
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Absent one or the other I don't think he needs to resign.
Calista241
(5,586 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Calista241
(5,586 posts)As long as we hold ourselves to the same standards as fucking Republicans.
BannonsLiver
(16,384 posts)You think Franken and Moore are apples to apples? Is that it?
Get a grip.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)It's sexual battery...That said, it is NOT in the picture shown, so there's no proof whatsoever.
spotthebird
(171 posts)Bettie
(16,105 posts)I tend to believe the Conyers allegations, for a variety of reasons, but the Franken stuff smacks entirely of ratfucking.
They want to get rid of him because he is a bulldog in the senate and that scares them.
This article doesn't convince me of anything except that there are women out there who care so little about real sexual assault that they are willing to lie to make political points.
riverwalker
(8,694 posts)Look at him, is it even physically possible?
Denzil_DC
(7,234 posts)I'm going to follow Franken's lead in responding to this, as before, but I have to admit this was an immediate question that entered my head given previous discussion of Franken's stature.
greeny2323
(590 posts)I don't believe Trump voters based on this kind of evidence.
And I'm allowed to not believe it.
riverwalker
(8,694 posts)She also ran with the poorly verified State Fair story. Both stories are from her. Why does she have it in for him?
riverwalker
(8,694 posts)No one ran with it except MJ Lee. Now we find she is running with this new story. Her Twitter Page @Mj_lee has a header asking for harassment tips and looks like she just runs with anything, verifies nothing. Pisses me off this is crappy journalism.
maxrandb
(15,330 posts)Maybe MJ Lee can find some woman or 24 women who were groped or flat out raped by Donnie Short Fingers.
I think we should visit her twitter page and encourage her to talk to some of those women.
a kennedy
(29,658 posts)I am so nervous when I wake up everyday and find some more allegations against Senator Franken, that I hate even reading the headlines. Reading your post makes it better, thanks.
dalton99a
(81,485 posts)Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)DU crowd (who is conspicuously silent now)
Since the photographic evidence is completely contradictory, I think we can safely say MJ Lewis is a hack and NOT a liberal reporter as claimed.
dawg
(10,624 posts)Every accuser deserves to be heard, but some level of skepticism is in order.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)I call bullshit. Unless her breast is on her back, he's nowhere NEAR it.
BannonsLiver
(16,384 posts)One poster (who has also called for Franken to resign) has repeatedly said that and chastised those who dare to ask questions in any way.
This is why we ask questions. Get it now?
bitterross
(4,066 posts)Sorry if that offends.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)But I once accidentally "cupped" the side of friends breast in a photo. Didn't even know it happened till I saw the pic and really embarrassed.
AJT
(5,240 posts)He needs to make a public statement on camera. This would not have been an accident that he would not recall, this would have been very intentional.
Demsrule86
(68,565 posts)He is handling it well.
still_one
(92,190 posts)air.
The problem is if Al comes out and categorically denies it, there should be no doubt the media will characterize it as Al Franken calling his accusers liars, and that will cause a feeding frenzy which will not be based on facts.
He flatly denied one of the anonymous accusers' accusation that he propositioned her to accompany her to the restroom.
I think that Al wants this to be done before Congress where people will be compelled to be under oath. This trail by media is a losing strategy.
AJT
(5,240 posts)He can't let someone say he grabbed her breast without a categorical denial. If he lets it go then people will assume he is guilty. The accuser made sure it was something that couldn't be an accident so his prior statement could not apply. If this person is lying what is he supposed to do?
JI7
(89,249 posts)pnwmom
(108,977 posts)Polly Hennessey
(6,796 posts)and not a good one for women. They know Democrats fold like an accordion when the going gets tough. Looks like they are going to see if their drip, drip theory works. Perhaps in Al we have someone who will fight back. Yes, I know you all say we should believe everything every woman says and as a woman I know women sometimes the truth do not tell. Al Franken needs to let the inquiry run its course. I, for one, am willing to wait. My bet is that Al will win in the end (and no that is not a pun).
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)At this point anyone can say anything to get rid of one of our BEST fighters at a critical time.
DO NOT BELIEVE THE BULLSHIT
maryellen99
(3,788 posts)And its lead by those who want us to make nice with the hard core Trumpies.
JI7
(89,249 posts)Nanjeanne
(4,960 posts)working with or for men, a sense of being powerless can freeze a woman from confronting the abuser. But this Franken stuff has me completely confused. If, what this woman says is true - and he kept his hand all the way over her breast -- why the hell did she not immediately say "Al take your freaking hand off my breast right now"? Or more politely, "Hey Al, I think you missed my shoulder" - or even moved away from him and not take the photo?
She didn't work for him. She was in a public place with people milling around. There was a photographer pointing a camera right at her when his hand was on her breast. Why freeze up and submit to inappropriate groping? I know I can't speak for all women - or how women "should" behave when faced with this - but jeez -- this woman was not in any way powerless to confront a man who she says is behaving inappropriately. Of course, that's if one is going to believe this story. Which I have a hard time doing. And this goes for the other accuser - the one who's husband was standing there taking the picture while she supposedly was groped. Very very odd and, for me, these accusations really diminish the real assaults and harrassment that real victims face.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)The picture shows that Franken cannot reach her breast.
The idea that Franken would do it openly in front of a camera is laughable.
This Trump supporters' non profit is about to get a substantial donation . Non profits can pay their executive a million dollar salary.
hadEnuf
(2,190 posts)EVERYTHING that comes out of the Right's mouth is a lie. EVERYTHING. They are trying to create a new reality.
Beat the shit out of their lies and stay focused on bringing that fascist bastard in the WH down.
bdamomma
(63,849 posts)nt
this is a definite hit job on Democrats.
The first who should go is the POS in the WH. There are 16 women who accused him.
Oh Mr. Bannon fuck you.
Response to a kennedy (Original post)
dlk This message was self-deleted by its author.
Horse with no Name
(33,956 posts)I have NEVER posed like this woman. He should claim sexual assault by the way she is up all over him.
I'm sorry.
I don't believe her. The way she is posed, there isn't any physical way he could reach her breasts.
Not only that--would you continue to pose with a giddy smile if you felt you had just been sexually assaulted?
I wouldn't.
If the assault happened right before the picture snapped--you would have seen my fat ass leaving the picture or a look of disgust on my face.
I see neither.
KPN
(15,645 posts)If you must post these articles, highlight what is really relevant --- that this accusation is just another bullshit attempt to erase a major problem for the WH and GOP in the form of an effective Democratic Senator!!!
Why are people here at DU falling for this crap?????? You are smarter than that! Act it!
nt
MFM008
(19,808 posts)These accusations are curiously timed?
At least one a week to keep this thing going?
There are other soldiers standing around them.
Are you saying Franken committed an assault
front of his USO minders?
This isn't just to get him to resign it's to RUIN his effectiveness as a senator and muddy his reputation.
Any maggot supporter that has a picture of Franken is coming forward and I want to see WHO'S being paid.
GoCubsGo
(32,083 posts)Nanjeanne
(4,960 posts)Kimchijeon
(1,606 posts)Just want to puke how stupid are all of these people who fall for it! This is obviously distraction, and of course Franken is a huge thorn in their side.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Why would any groper grab in photos?
Demit
(11,238 posts)She's so oddly specific, and yet still offers contradictory descriptions, right in the same moment.
I'm also having trouble with the 5 to 10 seconds that his hand is on or around her chest...then she has time to shift her body...it's a kind of long time for a photographer to take to set up for what is a casual snapshot. Do a little test in your mind: picture the scenario while you count out the seconds. It's very questionable.
TCJ70
(4,387 posts)...and being able to cover her chest. I'm taller than Franken and I don't think I could do that with my arm span. He must be part Mr. Fantastic!
Flaleftist
(3,473 posts)There would be a picture of him actually groping someone. 🤔
wryter2000
(46,043 posts)wryter2000
(46,043 posts)His hand is clearly on her back.
When the initial accusations came out I believed the woman, but I also knew that if Franken was a groper more women would come forward with more serious allegations. All Ive seen since then is a coordinated right wing smear attempt. Anyone putting Franken in the same category as Weinstein, Moore, or Lauer is a fool.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)And accusations of being a right-winger for those who suggest otherwise.
Denzil_DC
(7,234 posts)of "excusing all this because it's a Democrat" and choosing for whatever reason to believe without question suspiciously timed anonymous allegations.
What next: fair game for a claim by anyone who's ever been photographed with Franken or appeared with him - or indeed any other public figure - in public, and it's instant unchallenged conviction?
If you can't see the dangers and lack of justice in that and how it could backfire on the quest for credibility of genuine accusers, I think you're in a small minority.
There is no identified accuser in this latest round today, just evidence of shoddy, clickbait journalism from outlets not known for their concern for diligence and accuracy.
If a named individual comes up with a credible story, that deserves a hearing. Meanwhile, the grinding of agendas on here is too blatant to ignore any more.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Stephanie Kemplin - already being a called a liar in a couple of threads - has had her accusations reported on CNN, NBC, and the Washington Post (not shoddy outlets).
Denzil_DC
(7,234 posts)And, to be honest, as someone who's gone out on a limb in the past on these issues much against the DU grain, that's perfectly legitimate.
It would have been one claim, but then another anonymous one gets added to the mix (my reference to the latest round), and has an only too predictable effect on those who've ceaselessly been banging this drum since this whole mess started and gives cover for "yet another one" pushing them over the edge. I respectfully suggest you quit trying to guilt-trip people who don't deserve it.
This whole situation and run of events and the timing stinks, and I wouldn't convict a Republican on Kemplin's claim alone. But those who for whatever reason seem to want to believe her will do so.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)When someones gives their name and photo, they are accused of being liars and having questionable motives. No wonder others wish to remain anonymous.
Denzil_DC
(7,234 posts)None.
If these were such serious allegations that they felt driven to bring them up now, with the hope that he'll mend his ways from one of today's accusers, then that would be the appropriate thing to do. That would bring legal consequences and accountability, and a degree of formal protection.
If they're going to subject him to the kangaroo court of public opinion, with its own tenuous evidential rules and no holds barred when somebody's professional, and most importantly activist, career is on the line, then they've chosen their forum.
So they have to bear the consequences.
And believe me, if I think someone's overstepping the mark, I'll probably have to join a queue of DUers taking issue with them.
What's more likely is that a welter of unevidenced allegations means that women will tend even more to be disbelieved when they've experienced serious abuse.
If you think people are cynical on here, you need to take a few steps outside your door - it's a rough old world out there. And the most cynical are those who're cheering this whole debacle on.
brush
(53,776 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)It is shameful that so few others are doing likewise.
brush
(53,776 posts)of what they claim.
Call us crazy.
And when the next anonymous accusation surfaces just in time to keep the whole scandal in the spotlight until Moore is elected and the tax scam is passed, watch it all dissipate just as trump's threats to sue did.
Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)pnwmom
(108,977 posts)He's a short man with proportionately sized arms, and that photo doesn't even show his hand is close. It would have to extend more than another foot to cup her breast, as her story goes.
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)Vinca
(50,270 posts)contributed, Kemplins in Ohio have donated to Republicans on multiple occasions. Someone mentioned Roger Stone and an orchestrated attack like this is right up his alley.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)pnwmom
(108,977 posts)which would have been in front of the photographer.
So the photographer would be a witness. What did that person see?
I can't see Franken's arm stretching that far OR him doing it in front of the photographer.
Fresh_Start
(11,330 posts)like a saint in comparison.
Kimchijeon
(1,606 posts)Fuck that.
panader0
(25,816 posts)Where's the evidence? Not in the photo. Don't fall for this BS.