US regulators look to ease swaps rules
Source: Financial Times
US regulators are exploring ways to give large foreign banks and overseas subsidiaries of US lenders a reprieve from stringent new derivatives rules, potentially alleviating one of the biggest concerns facing global financial institutions.
The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission is looking to grant a temporary exemption to swap dealers that may fall under the jurisdiction of foreign financial authorities from complying with a host of post-financial crisis regulations governing derivatives transactions, people familiar with the matter said.
New regulations such as higher capital requirements, the mandated posting of margin, central clearing and tighter business conduct standards are among the directives slated to take effect aimed at reducing systemic risk. Wall Street analysts have warned investors that these rules are expected to take a significant bite out of bank earnings power.
Last week, Michel Barnier, the EUs financial services commissioner, sent a stern letter to US financial supervisors strongly encouraging them to delay applying new swaps rules to European banks until there is legal clarity about what the regulations would entail.
Read more: http://liveweb.archive.org/http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1920878e-8c7d-11e1-9758-00144feab49a.html
NRaleighLiberal
(60,014 posts)abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)sakabatou
(42,152 posts)They're try to undo, again, protections that lead to the disaster in 2006 (I think it was that year).
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)...you get used to weight of all that debt.
- And since it's all digital money, we won't have to worry about wheelbarrows.......
K&R
''Dear, if you want a loaf of bread AND milk, we'll need another wheelbarrow.''
Bozita
(26,955 posts)NO prosecutions of any of the bad actors by either the SEC or the DOJ.
And that's in spite of the 2200 page Bankruptcy Court Examiner's Report which has gone largely ignored by both the SEC and DOJ.
Why have ANY rules if they aren't going to be enforced?
freshstart
(265 posts)and nothing has become of this NJ lawsuit that I can find. Other states, like Fla lost even more. But, they use the pension issue to attack the teachers and other public workers. George Bush's cousin George Walker was a big wig at Lehman, and Jeb was there at some point. From what I understand the money ended up with Bain via Neuberger Berman with George Walker at the head. I can't understand how they could have a penny after bankruptcy court.
http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2009/03/new_jersey_is_suing_lehman.html
http://open.salon.com/blog/thomas_horton/2008/10/06/fuld_by_lehman_bushs_family_connection
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)lastlib
(23,226 posts)...a trillion here, a trillion there....what, do you think it'll ever add up to real money???
lib2DaBone
(8,124 posts)The kids dont have a job or hope of ever getting a job in this country..... and CONgress is perfectly happy shipping jobs to China.
They were lied to and scammed... and we are AMAZED that they are pissed off.
Amonester
(11,541 posts)multi-billionnaire banksters' tax heavens.
They haven't stolen enough yet?
Of course not.
sendero
(28,552 posts).. to keep the ponzi-economy going. It's all going to work great until it doesn't.
KG
(28,751 posts)unkachuck
(6,295 posts)....won't enforce the laws and since the federal reserve, Central Committee of the Capitalist Party of America, won't manage responsibly and since the fec Politburo, won't enforce the rules and since the Standing Committee of the Central Committee is granting exemptions, the only way I can protect myself is to stop feeding the wall-street gambling addicts and distance myself completely from the evils of capitalism....
snappyturtle
(14,656 posts)a big "NO"! Anytime I hear deregulation scares me....well, since Raygun anyway.
freshstart
(265 posts)it is an excellent movie. Goes to show how little they've learned from 2008.
mike_c
(36,281 posts)Greedy rat bastards.
Amonester
(11,541 posts)but made 'a killing' from that collapse, thanks to their carefully bribed 'staffs' in all capitalist governments...
Why wouldn't they WANT to make another 'killing' now?
freshstart
(265 posts)Bozita
(26,955 posts)freshstart
(265 posts)Those videos they have up now for a primer are good. One of them has Greenspan stating his ideology was wrong, I had never seen that before. I can't believe that the Republicans are following the path of deregulation, knowing that even Greenspan says there is a flaw and that free markets don't regulate themselves. Frontline is one of my favorites.
amandabeech
(9,893 posts)Even corporate devil Jack Welch admitted on CNBC that he was wrong on how he ran GE, but he, too, is back to his old song and dance--every year, fire 20% of your employees, no matter what.
got root
(425 posts)Don't they realize that 'we' run the show?
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)The Magistrate
(95,247 posts)"Fuck 'em! Fuck 'em twice!"
mbperrin
(7,672 posts)Or put them upside down from telephone poles and shoot them.
Some methods for dealing with monsters are completely appropriate.
Amonester
(11,541 posts)There are other ways to deal with massive roberry that don't include mass murder.
mbperrin
(7,672 posts)My suggestion has been proven effective many times over. I'm really a populist at heart, not as much progressive.
My reaction to people trying to kill me is to get them first, and that's what is happening here. People are dying for corporate profits, and so the worst of them need to go. Then we can see how much further.
But instead of dealing with them, as you can see by the OP, our government is trying to figure out how to re-enable them.
cliffordu
(30,994 posts)allan01
(1,950 posts)enough already
jmowreader
(50,557 posts)The problem with THIS history is, it's only five years old.
I realize people have short attention spans, but this is ridiculous. If anything, they need to INCREASE the rules on derivatives to do things like banning derivatives whose underlying securities are derivatives, and regulating credit default swaps as insurance--including a ban on purchasing CDS when you don't own the underlying derivatives.
Go read up on the Goldman Sachs scandal, then remind yourself: not only was everything they did in that scandal legal, it is STILL legal.
Festivito
(13,452 posts)Repubs took their funding away during a lame duck session, and now won't give it back, instead railing on Dems, Obama specifically, that we must be the cause of the problem they created.