Indiana pizzeria that backed 'religious freedom' law reopens
Source: Indystar
WALKERTON, Ind. A northern Indiana pizzeria that closed after its owner supported Indiana's religious objections law has reopened.
Memories Pizza owner Kevin O'Connor says he reopened about 4 p.m. Thursday. He says that within an hour, all eight tables were filled and six people were waiting for carryout orders. There were no protests as of 7 p.m.
O'Connor faced criticism after he and his daughter, Crystal, said they would never deny service to a gay customer but would decline to cater a same-sex wedding because it would conflict with their Christian beliefs. Protests led them to close the Walkerton pizzeria about 20 miles southwest of South Bend.
O'Connor says he'll use some of his share of more than $842,000 raised online to make improvements. He also plans to donate to charity.
Read more: http://www.indystar.com/story/news/2015/04/09/indiana-pizzeria-backed-religious-law-reopens/25549263/
Oh why didn't they remain closed and scram to Cayman Islands with their 850K?
*mutter*
Well, sales will be way way way way down unless it gets supported by bigots.
caraher
(6,352 posts)A friend says she knows locals who claim the pizza slices at the gas station are better.
Smithryee
(157 posts)Even a frozen pizza has to be far better than the bitter bigot pie of Memories.
May they fade into a bad memory
starroute
(12,977 posts)If that's so, they're unlikely to have any problems with their regular clientele.
LittleGirl
(8,951 posts)I lived about 30 minutes from there growing up. It's puny.
trof
(54,274 posts)At least in my red area.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Psephos
(8,032 posts)You do. Think about it. Bigotry is judgment and put-down of people who do not share the same genetics, religion, age, politics, etc. Show me the difference.
And no, I do not agree with Memories Pizza's politics in the slightest.
I would not buy a Memory Pizza but I will tolerate their right to their religious beliefs as insurance that mine will be tolerated as well. The alternative is the hive mind.
840high
(17,196 posts)Gore1FL
(22,855 posts)They aren't analogous to to age and genetics.
Psephos
(8,032 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Now I'm a liberal Democrat atheist.
My story is repeated quite a lot amongst my friends.
I'm not saying my experience negates those studies, but the evidence I've seen seems to contradict them.
brett_jv
(1,245 posts)You're essentially asserting here that the only form of heredity that's 'valid' is the type that can be seen to be present in both parent and child.
And yet ... we have gay people. And we (most of us anyway) assert that people are 'born that way' ... which by nature means 'in your genes'.
Or are you asserting that every gay person born has one or both parents that are 'in the closet'?
Not trying to be an ass, but do you understand the point I'm making? Something doesn't (IMHO) have to always been in successive generations in order to be hereditary/part of one's genetic code.
Some of what one might call 'mutations' (not meant in a derogatory way) such as proclivity towards homosexuality (or liberalism or conservatism) may very well be both 'common' ... and yet virtually entirely random.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)I think political leaning and sexual preference are very different things. Also, the genetic argument would, I would think tend to suggest that white Europeans would tend to conservatism, but Europe is generally a lot more progressive on most issues.
Perhaps epic emetics is involved. But the genetic thread suggested here seems pretty thin to me. Still I can be convinced by more evidence, it it emerges.
Gore1FL
(22,855 posts)No one is predisposed, however to be a republican christian, a libertarian Hindu, or a liberal muslim. Those are free choices.
Their religious beliefs have nothing to do with their bigotry. You are giving them a pass, could you tell me why? Because you might someday need the bigotry get out of jail free card too?
They are religious frauds who pick and choose which parts of that old book to adhere to and you should be aware of that fact.
Fucking phoney ass Christians piss me off.
Psephos
(8,032 posts)The precise use of language is a marker of precise thought.
[from thefreedictionary.com]
big·ot (bĭg′ət)
n.
One who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ.
[from Oxford Dictionaries abridged]
Definition of bigot in English:
noun
A person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions.
[from Merriam-Webster]
Function: noun
a person who won't listen to anyone whose ideas or beliefs are different from his or her own; especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial group) with hatred and intolerance.
A universal trait of bigots is that they do not consider themselves bigoted.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)this person's bigotry to any other group because of their "religious belief(s)" and tell me that they are not raving bigots hiding behind their holy book and how they interpret it. No better than the Taliban or Boko Harem in my book. These pizza owners are bigots, pure and simple. Is that precise enough for you?
Fiendish
(47 posts)You're using some pretty rampant hyperbole, don't you think? You really can't compare the owners of a pizzeria who don't want to cater a gay wedding to groups who stone women because they were raped, actively hunt down and murder homosexuals, and saw people's heads off.
I disagree with their stance and their politics, but let's be real here, yeah? There's no valid comparison here to the groups you named, and I find it frankly disturbing that you made that comparison.
Why, you ask? Because there's no reasoning with groups like the Taliban or Boko Haram. Either they kill you or you kill them. Period, full stop. You lumping fellow Americans into that same category is, to me, profoundly disturbing.
It raises a question, as well. If you could kill these people, with the intention of eradicating their beliefs, would you do so?
heaven05
(18,124 posts)hyperbole? Christians burned witches at one time and backed slavery. To me that is the same as sawing off heads that the violent extremist are doing now with their interpretation of their holy book in regard to non-believers. I feel that with a little prodding, by fox news losers, the Cruz types, Scott types, Darren Wilson types, Michael Slager types, Bundy types and their fellow fox news travelers, a majority who would claim to be Christian, would stone, burn and lynch human beings again, with no compunction at all about doing so.
With the current climate of hate, rampant in RW america and american culture in general, against people not heterosexual, not white male and not Christian, IF the repubthugs and their tea party faction should gain executive power again and pass legislation to totally repeal the Civil Rights Act(s), Roe v Wade and all voting rights for POC, 90 percent of fox news losers would be in favor of them doing so and I'm being generous with the 90%. While it is admirable that you would disagree with these type of retrograde practices and you feel there is no valid comparison to the groups I named, boko and taliban, I feel after watching the political scene for the last six years or so, with Nov 4 2014 being the culmination of the current expression of retrograde mentality this culture is experiencing, that we are headed for some wicked and evil times that will be guided by racist fascist who would prefer a theocratic rule to the rule of law and the fox news sheeple would follow like lemmings to the sea.
There is no reasoning with the Cruz types who deny climate change-global warming, who deny americans the right to vote, who justify the execution of unarmed people in the streets, most of whom are people of color. It is profoundly disturbing to me to watch the bundy types and their hate toward others who are not white. They, if allowed, would be the american boko harem and the military arm of the american taliban, the republican and tea party factions.
You can hide behind outrage with your use of a word like hyperbole to explain away reality as experienced by millions of people, but it doesn't sway me at all. Logic is, that if hate is allowed to fester, as it has in this country for 150 years against POC mainly, but many others now, with periodic outbreaks of lynchings, murder of LGBT people, the denial of voting rights, the denial of women the right to make choices concerning their own bodies, then the future in the hands of the Christian-repubthugs/tea party does not look so rosy. It is extremely, profoundly disturbing to me, the hate, present in this culture NOW, as exhibited by so many and denied by so many others, that is growing among a very polarized populace. Not festering in the cultural american swamps and sewers where it had been concealed for 150 years or so, but now in the open and unconcealed. Hyperbole? No.
Fiendish
(47 posts)I suppose I have more faith in people being fundamentally good. I mean that in general, of course. I just find it dismaying when people label political opponents as "evil." I don't think there's any such thing as an absolutely good or absolutely evil person. Everyone is a shade of grey.
That said, you're right to point out the problem with mob or herd mentality. That sort of thing is why people who were, at bottom, decent human beings stood by and did nothing about the Holocaust, for instance. You had one herd actively jumping on the bandwagon, and the other herd passively watching it all happen and doing nothing to stop it.
But I just don't agree with your comparison of the modern-day right-wing in America to the Taliban or Boko Haram. A sizable chunk of my family leans right-wing, and I can't picture them ever stoning gays or sawing heads off. In any group of people, you'll find some loonies on the fringes, so yeah, some of the frothing-at-the-mouth types might do the things you're talking about. But your average garden-variety conservative? No, I don't think so.
So yeah, hyperbole. As I said in the beginning, we may just have to agree to disagree here.
Judi Lynn
(164,050 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Psephos
(8,032 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)nope.
Fiendish
(47 posts)I read it more as "Check your thought process."
One thing left- and right-wingers are equally guilty of, in my opinion, is bigotry, hatred, and intolerance towards each other. When you listen to the rhetoric from some of the extreme folks on both sides, what you hear is that the other side is "the enemy." And of course, an enemy must be destroyed, and can rarely be reasoned with.
Similarly, I have heard/read progressives opine, in the same breath or sentence, that all conservatives are stupid, idiotic, evil, inbred, bigoted, etc. etc. etc., unlike us progressives. By the same token, I've heard/read conservatives opine that progressives are all childish, foolish, naive, emotion-driven, etc. etc. etc., unlike us conservatives.
Those are bigoted, prejudicial statements that paint an entire group of people with a very broad brush. You can't condemn bigotry in one group while making bigoted statements about that group. That's called hypocrisy, and it completely erodes the moral high ground so many people claim to occupy.
The other problem with this outlook is that it completely precludes any and all cooperation, compromise, or even something as simple as civil, reasonable discussion.
And that is why the USA is the way it is in 2015, in my opinion. We can't look at each other and see countrymen with whom we disagree. We look at those who differ from us politically as enemies to destroy.
Response to frylock (Reply #35)
Fiendish This message was self-deleted by its author.
christx30
(6,241 posts)with those that would deny services to gay people. It's like a thread about Islamic terrorism, and someone makes a crack about Muhammad, or paints all Muslims as terrorists. That person would be called out on it, and rightly so.
Response to christx30 (Reply #55)
Post removed
christx30
(6,241 posts)There are good people and bad people in every religion (and nonreligion). I've seen religious people wildly and enthusiastically misinterpret their own holy book to justify saying and doing all sorts of terrible things. But that doesn't mean that all members of that religion are terrible. I wouldn't make any jokes about "Jeezus Juice" any more than I would laugh at that cartoon of Muhammad with a bomb for a turban.
The pizza place hasn't discriminated against anyone. They have not denied service to anyone. From what I've seen, they're just doing their pepperoni and mushroom thing. But an employee gives an answer to a reporter's question, and suddenly, the whole place is Satan, and the Internet attacks them and wants to see the place closed down and everyone lose their jobs.
That kind of activity isn't going to win any friends on the other side. It's going to make them harden their hearts against us.
Now, I do support gay marriage wholeheartedly. I think if people love each other, they should be allowed to get married. It's a no brainer to me. But I do understand that there are people out there that don't feel comfortable with it, and I'm ok with that too.
If someone is opposed to gay marriage on religious grounds, that doesn't make them a bigot. What makes them a bigot is when they actively campaign against gay marriage, or actively discriminate against gay people.
If a Christian says, "I disagree with it, but it's your life so do what you want," they're not a bigot, in my book. The Christians who are trying to legislate their religion and their morality, on the other hand, are most certainly bigots.
We'd be a lot better off as a nation if people could comprehend that you can't legislate from religion unless it's something we all agree on, such as murder. We might not agree on when the killing of another human being is murder (see the Trayvon Martin case, for instance), but we can all agree that murder is not a good thing.
We'd also be a lot better off if we could have civilized, reasoned discussion of our ideological differences. Unfortunately, it seems that screaming at one another is the de facto method of communication when people differ on politics.
Major Nikon
(36,925 posts)So it's kinda hard to see where the point comes in.
Major Nikon
(36,925 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Hogwash. They have a right to believe as they will, but if expression of that belief violates the rights of another, then those beliefs are open to scrutiny and curtailment.
Religious freedom is important. Religious zealotry is a danger. Besides, my guess is that majority of these "devout" Christians have only the vaguest idea of what is actually IN the Bible.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)heaven05
(18,124 posts)in that city to support this pizza joint and if this joint should say they didn't want to serve blacks, they would probably get a million more from bigots nationwide in their gofundme account....no doubt.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)They were probably in trouble and decided to make a cynical play for cash.
grifters
WhoWoodaKnew
(847 posts)started sending them cash.
Atman
(31,464 posts)Some Glenn Beck goon started it for the pr. Who knows if these people even got any if the money raised in their name?
blackspade
(10,056 posts)And I don't believe that they were unaware of the gofundme site.
I'm sure it came as a 'surprise' that they could reopen.
Atman
(31,464 posts)I'm surprised Sarah Palin hasn't shown up yet to endorse them.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)They were asked a question by a reporter doing a story. They didn't open their door and shout it so a reporter heard it. Quite different.
christx30
(6,241 posts)to various causes to support disabled children, a woman's help group, firefighters, police trusts and a number of Christian churches. Also giving money to that florist in Washington State that was fined $1,000 for refusing to serve a gay wedding.
rurallib
(64,569 posts)nearly a cool million from the admirers of hate.
Sparhawk60
(359 posts)And yet, my refusal to support gay Klingon marriages has netted me not one dime.
/it blows my mind this pizza place raked in close to a million dollars
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)always taking and wanting for unearned riches.....
douggg
(239 posts)certainly got them more money.
840high
(17,196 posts)Could have been themselves or any other christian "victim" out there posting those threats. Prove they got legitimately threatened and not just caught some grief on the internet.
840high
(17,196 posts)them down. Google is your friend.
Atman
(31,464 posts)Huh? What changed? $800,000 will stop someone from torching their store? How does that work?
Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)jmowreader
(52,917 posts)I feel sorry for their employees. You know while the asshole owner was doing the martyr thing he was all "if thou do not work, thou will not eat."
Hence, because they didn't work they didn't get paid.
Assume "sir, we weren't working because you were closed" is a termination offense.
840high
(17,196 posts)they were not paid?
jmowreader
(52,917 posts)Atman
(31,464 posts)You think a tiny pizza shop, which was probably not even making money in the first place, was paying their employees NOT to work? Really?
douggg
(239 posts)got them even more money.
Then the money cured their fears so they're soon back in business.
AngryOldDem
(14,180 posts)davidpdx
(22,000 posts)for supporting these fundy assholes.
underpants
(195,097 posts)samsingh
(18,252 posts)the implied purpose.
Religious freedom is anything but. People aren't free to practice their religion with this law.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)And serve it HOT!
dembotoz
(16,922 posts)make hay while the sun shines???
if they print the name of the pizza joint on the box hell they will have folks getting take out just so they can show the folks back at home how pious they are
goldent
(1,582 posts)Klong
(18 posts)so the 800k+ would likely keep them open for more than 3 years. I just don't get how many heartless people it takes to keep a place like this open.
christx30
(6,241 posts)keep their food choices and their politics seperate. My guilty pleasure is the occasional Chick fil a nuggets meal. I love the waffle fries. It's not about being hateful. I just want food, and it sounds good at the time.
AngryOldDem
(14,180 posts)That's the American way.
To me, the place looks like one of the dives where Don and Peggy would go for a quick bite after pulling an all-nighter on Mad Men.
I really don't think they would have been anyone's first choice to cater anything, but as I said...they saw an opportunity and jumped on it. But the owner brought all that shit on himself in the first place, by being so offensive with his comments.
former9thward
(33,424 posts)The reporter went into their place randomly. Did they have some sort of vision that was going to happen? The reporter asked them the questions. They just answered the questions.
AngryOldDem
(14,180 posts)Just all too convenient, if you ask me.
A lot of people are just chomping at the bit to prove the point of just how "persecuted" Christians are here. I, for one, ain't buying it.
former9thward
(33,424 posts)And the threats were documented. Its not a question of Christians being persecuted. The internet has given people the ability to harass others they don't like. Yes, it happens by both sides whether you believe it or not. And it will continue.