Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
Wed May 13, 2015, 09:59 PM May 2015

(California) State bar declines to act on anti-gay attorney

Source: Bay Area Reporter

The State Bar of California has declined to pursue administrative action against an Orange County attorney who has submitted a proposed ballot measure calling for gays to be killed, according to a woman who started an online petition to have him disbarred.

Attorney Matthew McLaughlin filed his "Sodomite Suppression Act" with the state Attorney General's office a few months ago. The measure calls for gays to be killed with "bullets to the head" or other means. The proposal also calls for imprisonment of people who support LGBTs, and that they should be fined, exiled from the state, and barred from public office.

... Carol Dahmen, a political media consultant based in West Sacramento, launched a change.org petition calling for McLaughlin's disbarment. The petition has accrued more than 137,000 signatures to date. On May 4 Dahmen received a letter from Dane C. Dauphine, assistant chief trial counsel for the State Bar of California. Dauphine said that the state bar does not condone McLaughlin's actions, but that it was closing the matter without taking any action.

"This office appreciates your efforts in opposing bigotry and hate," Dauphine wrote in the letter, a copy of which Dahmen provided to the Bay Area Reporter. "We also believe that Mr. McLaughlin's political and social views are not shared by many members of the bar or by the California community at large. This office is limited, however, in our ability to prosecute attorneys who, in their personal capacity, engage in offensive speech. This is true even where the speech is hateful and morally reprehensible."

Read more: http://ebar.com/news/article.php?sec=news&article=70587

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
(California) State bar declines to act on anti-gay attorney (Original Post) Newsjock May 2015 OP
This is the same Bar that admitted Orly Taitz... eloydude May 2015 #1
State Bars do not discipline based on political views. former9thward May 2015 #3
But is a call for violence and murder considered "political views"? BigDemVoter May 2015 #9
This initiative is general hate. former9thward May 2015 #10
Thanks for the clarification. . . BigDemVoter May 2015 #11
This fucking petition has gotten 137,000 signatures? TDale313 May 2015 #2
That's 0.3% of the states population. Xithras May 2015 #5
To clarify ... Newsjock May 2015 #6
Oh, lol. I misread. Sorry. n/t Xithras May 2015 #7
Oops. I misread too. TDale313 May 2015 #8
Not suprising. Xithras May 2015 #4
 

eloydude

(376 posts)
1. This is the same Bar that admitted Orly Taitz...
Wed May 13, 2015, 10:43 PM
May 2015

Gotta be a guttersnipe to get the attention of California Bar Association..

former9thward

(32,123 posts)
10. This initiative is general hate.
Thu May 14, 2015, 05:00 PM
May 2015

But it does not call for the violence or murder a specific person. So it is protected by the First amendment and is considered political speech or views.

BigDemVoter

(4,158 posts)
11. Thanks for the clarification. . .
Fri May 15, 2015, 07:43 AM
May 2015

I wasn't aware that it would need to be directed against a specific person. . .

TDale313

(7,820 posts)
2. This fucking petition has gotten 137,000 signatures?
Wed May 13, 2015, 11:52 PM
May 2015
That's maybe the most disturbing part of the article for me.

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
5. That's 0.3% of the states population.
Thu May 14, 2015, 12:25 PM
May 2015

Disturbing? Of course. Shocking? Not really. The wacko fringe will always exist.

TDale313

(7,820 posts)
8. Oops. I misread too.
Thu May 14, 2015, 03:29 PM
May 2015

Thought it was to get the initiative on the ballot. Signing to disbar him I totally get and is not at all disturbing.

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
4. Not suprising.
Thu May 14, 2015, 12:23 PM
May 2015

As offensive and hateful as the guy is, he didn't break any laws. Disbarring someone because they hold objectionable political or social views isn't just a slippery slope, it's a greased cliff. Once the precedent is set, it's hard to back away from it, so it's not surprising that the Bar didn't want to go there.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»(California) State bar de...