Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,020 posts)
Fri May 4, 2012, 03:10 AM May 2012

EPA e-mails on anti-pollution rules reveal agency’s frustration with White House

Source: Washington Post

Sometimes the Obama administration operates like a well-oiled machine when it issues pronouncements on how its proposed regulations will affect the nation.

Other times, it doesn’t.

An Aug. 30, 2011, e-mail exchange among Environmental Protection Agency officials, obtained by the Center for Progressive Reform under the Freedom of Information Act, provides a glimpse into how agency officials thought the White House failed to adequately capture their work on anti-pollution rules opposed by Republicans and industry officials.

In responding to an inquiry from House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) about which regulations proposed by his administration would cost more than $1 billion, President Obama sent a letter that — in EPA officials’ view — not only caught them by surprise but also misstated the cost of one of their rules and failed to highlight the potential benefits of others.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/epa-e-mails-on-anti-pollution-rules-reveal-agencys-frustration-with-white-house/2012/05/03/gIQAYeQDzT_story.html

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
EPA e-mails on anti-pollution rules reveal agency’s frustration with White House (Original Post) alp227 May 2012 OP
Jackson all but resigned modrepub May 2012 #1

modrepub

(3,495 posts)
1. Jackson all but resigned
Fri May 4, 2012, 06:34 AM
May 2012

I'm not sure how anyone can argue that the Clean Air Acts, passed with Republican presidential approval in 1970 and 1990, have been anything but successful. All one has to do is look at the magnitudes of improvement since the 1970 amendments and note that our GDP has generally grown during that time. It's that simple.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»EPA e-mails on anti-pollu...